Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Kassire]

So I think I'm going to go with grey to indicate people who have gone already in the initiative order while green will indicate people who haven't gone yet.

Thoughts?

Seems good to me

[Flying Dice]

Yep. Clear, concise, and helpful.

[My Name is Immaterial]

I may steal it for my games.

[Nerjin]

Huh... I just looked deeper into this weapon finesse thing. Doesn't KJ have to specify which weapon it applies to?

[kj1225]

That's what I asked when someone else took it and they said no.

[Nerjin]

Ah, so you don't. I need to make a couple of changes to the turn I just updated. You still didn't hit, but you actually had a positive number with the dagger.

[Flying Dice]

Why would it? Okay, to be fair, the wording is slightly unhelpful in that regard, considering that it follows the same naming pattern as Specialization, Focus, &c., but read the text compared to those. They all contain the phrase "Choose one type of weapon...", whereas Weapon Finesse doesn't.

Incidentally, I happened across a homebrew feat on the crappy D&D wiki. Think it would be allowable? Allowable with modifications? Pure nope?


Also, use brackets for rolls, because [8] vs. (.     

[Rolepgeek]

Or use parentheses. (8) See?

[Kassire]

Ah, so you don't. I need to make a couple of changes to the turn I just updated. You still didn't hit, but you actually had a positive number with the dagger.

It's safe to assume you've been applying the Weapon Finesse feat, correct?

[Nerjin]

Ah, so you don't. I need to make a couple of changes to the turn I just updated. You still didn't hit, but you actually had a positive number with the dagger.

It's safe to assume you've been applying the Weapon Finesse feat, correct?

For everyone else yes. It was just that time with him.

Also, just a hint: If I mess osmething up please inform me and I'll try to fix it as soon as possible.

[Nerjin]

Why would it? Okay, to be fair, the wording is slightly unhelpful in that regard, considering that it follows the same naming pattern as Specialization, Focus, &c., but read the text compared to those. They all contain the phrase "Choose one type of weapon...", whereas Weapon Finesse doesn't.

True, it doesn't.

Incidentally, I happened across a homebrew feat on the crappy D&D wiki. Think it would be allowable? Allowable with modifications? Pure nope?

I... Think that can be allowed. Yeah... I don't see why not.

Also, use brackets for rolls, because [8] vs. (.     

Alrighty... can do! Brackets for rolls with parentheses for damage.

[kj1225]

You can turn smileis off.

 8) Like so.

[Kassire]

Ah, so you don't. I need to make a couple of changes to the turn I just updated. You still didn't hit, but you actually had a positive number with the dagger.

It's safe to assume you've been applying the Weapon Finesse feat, correct?

For everyone else yes. It was just that time with him.

Also, just a hint: If I mess osmething up please inform me and I'll try to fix it as soon as possible.

Meh, I just realized I also made a mistake with another of my own actions, but that'll be addressed when it's my turn again.

[Flying Dice]

You can turn smileis off.

  Like so.

Can you just turn off the sunglasses emoticon? :V

Incidentally, I happened across a homebrew feat on the crappy D&D wiki. Think it would be allowable? Allowable with modifications? Pure nope?

I... Think that can be allowed. Yeah... I don't see why not.

Sounds good. It also gives me a good reason to take Weapon Focus: Rapier, which I liked for flavor reasons but dislike for being a sorta bad feat if you aren't going to be following it down that tree.

[Silthuri]

Wait list please.