Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Poll

PBP won, so is it new thread time?

No.
- 1 (7.1%)
Yes and (SAY WHO IN A POST) runs it.
- 6 (42.9%)
Moo. I am a sheep. -said the goat
- 7 (50%)

Total Members Voted: 13


Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 18

Author Topic: D&D 5th Edition Who-wants-to-try-this Thingie  (Read 32437 times)

Orange Wizard

  • Bay Watcher
  • mou ii yo
    • View Profile
    • S M U G
Re: D&D 5th Edition Who-wants-to-try-this Thingie
« Reply #165 on: July 14, 2014, 12:15:27 am »

Thanks for the form fillable char sheets Insanity!

Also, do we have to use the default traits/bonds/etc.? I'm using a default background because that affects stats, but until someone says otherwise I'm considering the rest of my backstory fair game.
I don't think they really affect stats... Do they?
You get certain skills and equipment depending on your background. As an acolyte, for example, I gain Religion as a skill and can use my proficiency bonus on those checks. You also get a "small knife" as part of your equipment, but I took a fork instead.
I suppose choosing a different skill would be fine, seeing as it doesn't make you more skilled, just skilled in a different area.
The ideals/bonds/whatever are just for fluff, unless Glorious Leader decides to use the inspiration mechanic. Even then it's still fluff for the most part.
I would say yes, customise away. Ultimately, though, it's up to the DM.
Logged
Please don't shitpost, it lowers the quality of discourse
Hard science is like a sword, and soft science is like fear. You can use both to equally powerful results, but even if your opponent disbelieve your stabs, they will still die.

BFEL

  • Bay Watcher
  • Tail of a stinging scorpion scourge
    • View Profile
Re: D&D 5th Edition Who-wants-to-try-this Thingie
« Reply #166 on: July 14, 2014, 12:25:02 am »

Here's what I've got so far:

Spoiler: Dain Sagedirk (click to show/hide)

EDIT: And goddammit I just realized his AC would actually be 17 because of his Fighting Style. FUCK.
« Last Edit: July 14, 2014, 12:30:25 am by BFEL »
Logged
7/10 Has much more memorable sigs but casts them to the realm of sigtexts.

Indeed, I do this.

tompliss

  • Bay Watcher
  • Goodbye ?
    • View Profile
Re: D&D 5th Edition Who-wants-to-try-this Thingie
« Reply #167 on: July 14, 2014, 02:08:46 am »

Isn't 14 strength a bit on the low side ? :)
Logged

My Name is Immaterial

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: D&D 5th Edition Who-wants-to-try-this Thingie
« Reply #168 on: July 14, 2014, 02:10:19 am »

Not really for a Int/Str based character.

tompliss

  • Bay Watcher
  • Goodbye ?
    • View Profile
Re: D&D 5th Edition Who-wants-to-try-this Thingie
« Reply #169 on: July 14, 2014, 02:15:44 am »

Well, it's a fighter.
I can understand that he may on defence rather than on offense, but it still looks rather weird ^^
Logged

My Name is Immaterial

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: D&D 5th Edition Who-wants-to-try-this Thingie
« Reply #170 on: July 14, 2014, 02:25:27 am »

He's planning to multi-class into Wizard.

BFEL

  • Bay Watcher
  • Tail of a stinging scorpion scourge
    • View Profile
Re: D&D 5th Edition Who-wants-to-try-this Thingie
« Reply #171 on: July 14, 2014, 06:05:59 am »

Isn't 14 strength a bit on the low side ? :)

The max at char creation is 15, and 14 and 15 function exactly the same. Because only modifiers matter. BFEL puts lots of thought into his munchkinry.
Logged
7/10 Has much more memorable sigs but casts them to the realm of sigtexts.

Indeed, I do this.

highmax28

  • Bay Watcher
  • I think this is what they call a tantrum spiral...
    • View Profile
Re: D&D 5th Edition Who-wants-to-try-this Thingie
« Reply #172 on: July 14, 2014, 11:57:28 am »

Isn't 14 strength a bit on the low side ? :)

The max at char creation is 15, and 14 and 15 function exactly the same. Because only modifiers matter. BFEL puts lots of thought into his munchkinry.
I thought the highest score possible was 18 all the way through?
Logged
just shot him with a balistic arrow, i think he will get stuned from that >.>

"Guardian" and Sigfriend Of Necrothreat
Jee wilikers, I think Highmax is near invulnerable, must have been dunked in the river styx like achilles was.
Just make sure he wears a boot.

BFEL

  • Bay Watcher
  • Tail of a stinging scorpion scourge
    • View Profile
Re: D&D 5th Edition Who-wants-to-try-this Thingie
« Reply #173 on: July 14, 2014, 02:14:01 pm »

Isn't 14 strength a bit on the low side ? :)

The max at char creation is 15, and 14 and 15 function exactly the same. Because only modifiers matter. BFEL puts lots of thought into his munchkinry.
I thought the highest score possible was 18 all the way through?

In previous editions it was, this one specifically states the highest at char creation is 15
Logged
7/10 Has much more memorable sigs but casts them to the realm of sigtexts.

Indeed, I do this.

tompliss

  • Bay Watcher
  • Goodbye ?
    • View Profile
Re: D&D 5th Edition Who-wants-to-try-this Thingie
« Reply #174 on: July 14, 2014, 02:29:39 pm »

Well, I think that it's part of the "stay more close to normality" thing, with the "20 is the max score you can ever have in a stat, even in the end of the game".
There would be no real sense in begining at 18 if the best man in the world would only have 20... ^^"

(well, except this character begins with 17 constit... after all, he's a dwarf -_- )
Logged

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: D&D 5th Edition Who-wants-to-try-this Thingie
« Reply #175 on: July 14, 2014, 02:41:41 pm »

Basically this game is streamlined so you cannot completely surpass the parameters of the game.

Which honestly is the one aspect of 5th that so far I am fine with. I've been on both sides of the coin and I see it as a boon to both.

So long as they don't do what 4th MOSTLY did and boil away what made items interesting.
Logged

highmax28

  • Bay Watcher
  • I think this is what they call a tantrum spiral...
    • View Profile
Re: D&D 5th Edition Who-wants-to-try-this Thingie
« Reply #176 on: July 14, 2014, 02:42:26 pm »

Wait. So using 4d6 and dropping the lowest ISN'T what I was supposed to do!? :o
Logged
just shot him with a balistic arrow, i think he will get stuned from that >.>

"Guardian" and Sigfriend Of Necrothreat
Jee wilikers, I think Highmax is near invulnerable, must have been dunked in the river styx like achilles was.
Just make sure he wears a boot.

Orange Wizard

  • Bay Watcher
  • mou ii yo
    • View Profile
    • S M U G
Re: D&D 5th Edition Who-wants-to-try-this Thingie
« Reply #177 on: July 14, 2014, 02:47:52 pm »

I used the default numbers (15, 14, 13, 13, 10, 8, IIRC) rather than pissing around with dice.

"20 is the max score you can ever have in a stat, even in the end of the game".
Is this now a thing?
Logged
Please don't shitpost, it lowers the quality of discourse
Hard science is like a sword, and soft science is like fear. You can use both to equally powerful results, but even if your opponent disbelieve your stabs, they will still die.

Rakonas

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: D&D 5th Edition Who-wants-to-try-this Thingie
« Reply #178 on: July 14, 2014, 05:09:10 pm »

Wait. So using 4d6 and dropping the lowest ISN'T what I was supposed to do!? :o
Yeah that's what I did, I ended up lucky with an 18 but with all my other rolls odd numbers. Having a stat limit seems stupid because adventurer's have almost always been supposed to be the geniuses of their race.
Logged

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: D&D 5th Edition Who-wants-to-try-this Thingie
« Reply #179 on: July 14, 2014, 05:10:54 pm »

Wait. So using 4d6 and dropping the lowest ISN'T what I was supposed to do!? :o
Yeah that's what I did, I ended up lucky with an 18 but with all my other rolls odd numbers. Having a stat limit seems stupid because adventurer's have almost always been supposed to be the geniuses of their race.

Given that 10 is average and 14 is genius even in 3.5... yeah...
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 18