Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[miauw62]

Pantsless, presumably.

[MetalSlimeHunt]

I'm willing to believe that a comic book used the archaic definition of "boner", I'm not willing to believe they repeated it five times in one story.

[Teneb]

I'm willing to believe that a comic book used the archaic definition of "boner", I'm not willing to believe they repeated it five times in one story.

I think it's far, far more than five times.

[Flying Dice]

The first one (re: Iron Man giving Captain America some solid dick) was acknowledged on the site itself as a well-done shoop.

e: AHAHAHAHAHA! The DotA Dragon indeed.

[Akura]

Cartoons were never meant for children.

[Execute/Dumbo.exe]

The first one (re: Iron Man giving Captain America some solid dick) was acknowledged on the site itself as a well-done shoop.

e: AHAHAHAHAHA! The DotA Dragon indeed.

I like how he stays perfectly correct with his grammar the whole way through.
Must be all that training.

[TempAcc]

Spoiler: Its funny because its true (click to show/hide)

[Teneb]

Spoiler: Its funny because its true (click to show/hide)

This is perfect.

[miauw62]

Basically any game where you can do rolls. Especially if you're still new to the game.

[Putnam]

The first one (re: Iron Man giving Captain America some solid dick) was acknowledged on the site itself as a well-done shoop.

e: AHAHAHAHAHA! The DotA Dragon indeed.

I like how he stays perfectly correct with his grammar the whole way through.
Must be all that training.

lol

the best part is like

how wrong he is

like he walks by himself into the middle of a bunch of heroes that have way more than enough stun time between them to knock him down

and then blames his team for not helping him do some stupid thing

[Baffler]

The first one (re: Iron Man giving Captain America some solid dick) was acknowledged on the site itself as a well-done shoop.

e: AHAHAHAHAHA! The DotA Dragon indeed.

I like how he stays perfectly correct with his grammar the whole way through.
Must be all that training.

lol

the best part is like

how wrong he is

like he walks by himself into the middle of a bunch of heroes that have way more than enough stun time between them to knock him down

and then blames his team for not helping him do some stupid thing

In the comments of that video I found this:

Spoiler: Image (click to show/hide)

Code: [Select]

＜￣｀ヽ、　　　　　　　／ ￣＞ Y´
　ゝ、　　＼　／⌒ヽ,ノ 　 /´T
　　　ゝ、 （ ( ͡◉ ͜> ͡◉)／L
　　 　　>　 　 　,ノA
　　　　　∠_,,,/´S

It was worth it in the end. But who put that video on the internet? The dude can't possibly be proud of his hissy fit.

[Graknorke]

Well he was streaming guessing by the facecam, so it could be anyone who was recording it for archival purposes.

[Flying Dice]

EroticDiscoHeat does a series on streamers who demonstrate excesses of rage and stupidity. If you want to le-may-may like an old hat, make sure to comment on those videos about how he's a hypocrite for raging and blaming his team when he mocks other people for it.

[EnigmaticHat]

"Invalid initializer member declarator" = Microsoft visual studio telling me I missed a parathesis

[Reelya]

idk, anything outside the parenthesis for a constructor is actually an initializer member, so that does actually make sense. The issue is that the compiler isn't psychic, it can't tell what you intended to write, only what you did actually write. I find this is the case most of the time that people, including myself get the shits at a compiler error. If you look at how the language syntax actually works it turns out the compiler was right more often than you or me are.

One example I recall from the programming thread went like this: guy writes code on a line which reads:

var1 * var2

then gets the shits because he gets an error message "unknown data type: var1". Wow, stupid compiler, right? Thinking "var1" is meant to be a data type and not a variable name. Dumbass machine, right? Well, no, actually because:

type *variable;

is the standard c/c++ way you declare a pointer to a variable. If the compiler gets fed unknown names all that it can do is look at the structure of the line of code and try and guess what structure you were going for. a * can mean a whole lot of different things in C++ depending on context. And if you just write "unknown1 * unknown2" it actually makes the most sense that this is a pointer declaration, rather than a multiplication of two hitherto undefined variables, especially since the multiplication isn't actually being stored anywhere.