Alright, let's take a look at the three votes on me for a second:
Hmm... I'm inclined to say we lynch 4mask. Let's lay out the three strikes against you.
1. slips up about the win con, so people figure he's nontown.
2. claims overly convenient and powerful role: survivor miller, with doctor power and 1-shot vig! Don't cop me, I'll come up guilty. Don't lynch me, you need my abilities.
3. Changes his claim, because NQT counterclaims survivor. Still overly convenient role. A doctor miller that wins if he's nightkilled?
I don't see a scumteam leaving a claimed doctor alive, hoping for his lynch.
If 4mask were indeed, hoping for a nightkill, it would have been better to leave off the survivor miller part of his roleclaim. But he didn't. Because he intended to stick with the survivor claim.
4mask
EPenguin has the most legitimate and well-thought-out points against me, silly as they are. However, this argument is full of holes:
a. He acts incredulous at my claimed role because it sounds silly. "A doctor miller that wins if he's nightkilled?". As if this is somehow a legitimate point.
b. He acts as though the scumteam wouldn't leave a doctor alive, as if there aren't more dangerous roles for them to worry about. I have a fairly low chance of actually protecting the scumkill target, as shown by my failure last night. On the other hand, a vigilante or roleblocker can severely handicap the scum.
c. He seems to think that me not wanting to reveal my true alignment and instead stick with a survivor claim is somehow scummy. Yes, this is exactly what I was going to do, because I want to accomplish my wincon. Unfortunately, NQT blew huge holes in that plan when he revealed that he was an actual survivor, which forced my hand because the odds of you all actually believing my fakeclaim after that were low, so I spilled the beans.
On Third Parties: Nope. I'm calling bullshit. I don't believe there are three scum AND three third parties. 50% town players at the start? No, I don't buy it. In this case, I go with the person whose claim is the crappiest, and that's 4mask.
This is a really poor argument and you should know better,
Toaster. Your argument is "well, you fakeclaimed in an attempt to accomplish your wincon, and I don't think that Jack would give us the arrangement he did, so because of my personal opinions you are obviously scum". Please come up with something better, scumbiscuit.
4mask: strat the day with the blame game, so either he has a wincon he want to complete or he really want rid of PTD, as i said am on PTDSide for this one4mask.
Started the day with a blame game? The job of anyone who is not anti-town is to find the scum. We do this with accusations. And questions. And logic. If you have a problem with this, then find a different game to play, because in this game, WE MAKE ACCUSATIONS. The fact that someone makes accusations is NOT logical grounds for a vote. If you were anything but a first time player, I'd be calling you a lazy scum right now, but your claim corroborates what Hapah said and I have no reason to suspect Hapah at the moment.
I'll be extremely suspicious tomorrow if you refuse to change your vote today, because that would be two days in a row where you voted someone on nonexistent grounds and then stuck with the vote. I'd call this SK behavior, not caring who gets lynched, but having an SK in a game with three scum, a lyncher, a survivor, and a martyr for 12 people stretches credulity to the extreme. So unless NQT is a lying scum, you're not an SK, but you could still be scum.
Author
Topic: Jack's Simple BYOR: Game over! Town win! (Read 54456 times)