this is laughable at best.
@Kansa, You say that it was the Lore holder's fault for approving Akroma's Lore. yet they didn't approve it. they even said in OOC that they didn't. I'm not blaming Akroma for approving her lore. I am, however, blaming her for forcing her lore into the game. But this entire argument is moot because the blame game is a stupid moot point.
@Akroma, wow. just wow. So, let me get this straight...
You say that a player has no control over the backstory of their character, well, I should say, You say that a player should not complain about their
entire lore being completely tossed out for a more generalized, less emotion driven potential plot that, excuse my french, will fuck all the people up and destroy all fucking sense of limits set in stone by the GM and the Co-GMs. No, I completely understand.
I didn't try? Bullshit. If you look back at the Amazeroth fight and the OOC from that point in time. I didn't complain about it. I said that that was stepping on my toes, by I would allow it, because I wanted to see where it went. But no. That point is moot because further down the line you ended up fully stepping on my foot to further cement Sen being an entity created of Amazeroth. So yeah. When it involves someone else's character
it deserves full disclosure about what is entailed. There is no "right" to not be disclosured. That person is not your character. IF you plan on changing something about that character to better fit in with your lore, You not only ask them if it is okay, but you are required to give them all info concerning the changes you want to make. You're not a goddamned queen, You have no privelege over changing anyone's character without their express permission.
And more over, I'm not suggesting we take up space in the OOC for Lore. We could use a bloody google.doc to contain it all.
another thing. I said that Sen was super ancient. I didn't say she has seen everything or has figured out the world. I'm going to politely ask that you
do not start putting words in my mouth like you currently are.
I am not asking you to retcon the entire damn thing. I am, however, asking you to move it to it's own entity, or work with project to make it work with void. Oh wait. You've already ran Projeck off so maybe that isn't possible now.
Oh, I'm not complaining about you putting eldritch horrors where they are meant to be. The problem is however... The "eldritch Horrors" in void are completey void creatures that exist only to destroy. Your "eldritch horrors" are creation spawned void entities that seek the complete destruction of existence, though beleive it or not, is completely impossible due to Lore. specifically Elf and Rag's lore.
So yeah. I could be bitter. I could be just making an ass out of myself. though if we really want someone making an ass out of themselves:
But for gods sake shut up about it. You didn't have fun, okay cool, that happens, but if that still bothers you after several months, you should consider somehow unbothering yourself
you want me to "unbother myself" over you trying to forcefully change my characters background? Shit, I already got over that shit by pushing my true sen lore to Projeck, Smurf, and PN. So yeah, Moot insult.
@Kansa, I won't say your wrong, but your not quite right either. Rag isn't the one who is the Lore holder for Void. Project is. And Project has already stated he did not approve Akroma's add ons to the Void lore. But I guess this argument is moot in a way seeing as how Akroma ran off another of our Lore holders. Again.
Actually, screw it. I wanna see normality on all Lore so I'm posting this:
http://strawpoll.me/3478615Yes. I am starting a vote to make lore public Domain. I'd rather have Lore be spoiled in the OOC rather than have a big clusterfuck pop up again because Lore is constantly being broken. If someone can't trust the other players to not meta in OOC knowledge, then this is probably not a game they should be playing.