Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 84 85 [86] 87 88 ... 98

Author Topic: The Movie Discussion Thread!  (Read 170440 times)

McTraveller

  • Bay Watcher
  • This text isn't very personal.
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1275 on: July 31, 2023, 07:05:11 am »

How is this thread so old?

Took the kids to see Barbie this weekend.  It was actually pretty decent!  Fun, well done, perhaps a bit too heavy on the jokes for the parents.  Great representation for the females. Strong, awareness of strengths and realities of the world.

Some interesting discussion points:

* It still perpetuates this idea of women versus men or women equals men.  My worldview is the sexes are to be complements, not rivals.  I don't know why modern thought is so bent on making them the same (when they aren't).  Now, note that I don't mean members of each sex can't have the same jobs, the same respect in society, etc.  I just mean that women aren't men, and men aren't women, and that's to be celebrated.  I was sad that the ending wasn't women and men coming together to solve a problem, but was more one group merely giving concessions to the other.

* 90% of the "things women have to deal with" speech are... things every human has to deal with? The only things men don't deal with are having to be a mother.  The rest of it - I wish more people - men especially - was aware of the maddening realities of humanity.

* There were zero good male role models in the movie. Every male was a lecher and/or moron. There wasn't enough development of Ken to make me feel like he wasn't still viewed as an accessory.
Logged
This product contains deoxyribonucleic acid which is known to the State of California to cause cancer, reproductive harm, and other health issues.

Starver

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1276 on: July 31, 2023, 10:23:13 am »

How is this thread so old?
...if you mean "so long without an update", I think there's a bit of a trough in film production (not the current strike, which may yet hit releases otherwise yet to come, but the Covid/post-Covid throttle-back leading into other things). My impression only, no hard stats at hand.

I've also not seen a film at the cinema, now, for... ages. Saw No Time To Die on TV (legitimate, free-to-air, broadcast TV), which must have been >12 months after its eventual (delayed) cinema release, and there's definitely some MCU/DC things I may have seen normally that are probably in 5he DVE shelves of the supermarket that just never coincided with the last time I was passing a multiplex with idle time in hand and intent, nor mask-related caution. And I really should support some 'monoplex"/(two-ish screen) independent outlets within relatively easy reach of me. I'm comparatively unconcerned about my lack of subscription to anything in the "streaming" domain, though. But that's just me, apparently missing the brief releases of anything 'interesting'. Not sure if that scales up to myself (and any large cohort of similarly apathetic non-patrons). But I was also hardly single-handedly supporting the respective sub-sectors of the entertainment industry beforehand, either.


So, anyway, there's been a lot about how the combined 'Barbieheimer' was the latest re-emergence of Event Cinema (just 8n time for the Actor's Strike to not entirely foil their Big Star Premier launch events). Which means that serious journalistic people who keep an eye on these things probably also think there's been a bit of a dearthbover the last few months/year.


I've got to say that, while not at all allergic to pink, I don't think I was ever going to make the effort to catch Barbie. I don't have kids(/grandkids/(grand-)niblings) with a need to be accompanied by (Grand-)Poppa/Unkie Starver. And I have as little personal interest in the product-line as I did in Playmobile[1]. I may catch it on TV, if I notice it at some convenient juncture. But something tells me it's no Monstrous Regiment, and the above review doesn't really help dissuade me of that idea.

Oppenheimer... tempting. Not necessarily for "boys toys" reasons. More interesting to see how Nolan has done mostly 'in camera' (and analogue film, apparently very little digital pre-/post-production in any form, saving the final transferal to digital projection systems for various screens it will be shown on. Also for curiosity about "Now I Am Become Death, the Destroyer of Worlds. By Oider of the Poiky Bloinders!"[2]. Though I am perhaps also quite drawn by the physics aspect (but also a little scared of the possible treatment, like with The Imitation Game vis-a-vis actual computing elements).


Oh dear, a long message, most of which isn't film review (or particularly useful speculative antici... ...pation). But perhaps reveals how I've been mulling over various subjects recently (like whether I'll be flashing the cash, any time soon, at a cinema box office near me). Out in the open, I suppose. Do laugh/cry/despair at all of this at your own leisure.


[1] I tell a lie... I did at one point have Playmobile figures, but they were far inferior (even to the middle-type in the third image down in this article, but especially to the 'buildable' non-mini figure to the left) to all things Lego™©®, IMO...

[2] Ok, cut me some slack. Someone with my accent trying to re-render in 'internationally understood English orthography' my internally hallucinated voice of the supposedly early 20thC edge-of-Black Country/Brummie/roots-in-Ireland accent. Without trying to invoke a very lazy 'Cockney' (or pure Belfast, or even Noo Joisey!), but on reading it back it could be interpretted that way... Yeah... No. It's not clearly working how I want. Don't even have any good '-ng's to try to emphasise, in that quote, and it'd be wrong to go all Yam-Yam or "Do Bist Death?" in self-response.
Logged

scriver

  • Bay Watcher
  • City streets ain't got much pity
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1277 on: August 01, 2023, 08:33:48 am »

I liked playmobile over lego. Sure, it's not as much about building and modulabulity but I preferred the larger sizes and it still has a lot of the whole "Yeah everything comes in standard shapes so you can use any of these things for any of the other themes" useability that lego offers.
Logged
Love, scriver~

dragdeler

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1278 on: August 02, 2023, 07:21:24 pm »

Old you say?

Folks say that Highlander 2 retcons Highlander 1, but I disagree, it's not 2 that is problematic but 3. (I have yet to watch the last one)

-Macleod gets exiled into the future (2)
-Macleod is incarnated in scottland in the middle ages. (1)
-Macleod entraps some immortals in a frozen cave. (3)
-Macleod adopts an orphan in WW2 (1)
-Macleod defeats the Ramirez murderer, in New York in the 80's (1)
-Macleod wins the prize, becomes kinda omniscient but also mortal. (1)
-Macleod adopted an arabian kid, they're close in the 90's at that point the kid is like 10. (3)
-Some immortal get unfrozen and manage to escape a magic cave. Guess Macleod is currently not omniscient. (3)
-Macleod still fails to bear a son, guess the ozone hole got bad really quick. (me)
-After defeating the cavedwellers, Macleod drives of into the sunset with the arabian kid and his new flame, to live in scottland, in the 90's. (3)
-Macleod looses his wive from the second movie, the one he supposedly aged with, to the ozone hole. (2)
-Macleod helps build the shield. (2)
-Macleod regains immortality by killing another immortal in 2024.(2)
-Supposedly they do something against the shield after learning that the ozone hole healed. (me)



So the thing with the cavedwellers... Hm magic ok whatever, technically Macleod was the only one at that time... But now I'm supposed to believe Macleod secretly had two families in the 90's and up to the 00's? One with the lady from new york who died to the sun, and one with the lady who worked in japan and the arabian kid? I mean at both the end of 1 and 3 we see him retiring in scottland so at least he wouldn't have to allways travel by plane but still...
Logged
let

zhijinghaofromchina

  • Bay Watcher
  • I am支景灏
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1279 on: August 04, 2023, 04:33:14 am »

How about the longest day in Chang’an , it may not fit the people in the western but it is surely fit for everyone who is interested in the Chinese culture and especially classical poems .
Firstly not to mention the errors in the historical events ,it is perfectly a wonderful film which focuses on the story of Li Bai and Gao Shi and reflects the meanings of the relationship between personal choices and the time.
It is somewhat similar to the Gone with the Wind which I watched recently .
Logged
问苍茫大地,谁主沉浮?我主沉浮!

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1280 on: August 04, 2023, 05:53:02 am »

How about the longest day in Chang’an , it may not fit the people in the western but it is surely fit for everyone who is interested in the Chinese culture and especially classical poems .
Firstly not to mention the errors in the historical events ,it is perfectly a wonderful film which focuses on the story of Li Bai and Gao Shi and reflects the meanings of the relationship between personal choices and the time.
It is somewhat similar to the Gone with the Wind which I watched recently .
I'll give it a look next week, this one remains one of my all time favourite TV shows so I'm a real fan of Chinese historical dramas (even if they are very historically inaccurate)!

zhijinghaofromchina

  • Bay Watcher
  • I am支景灏
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1281 on: August 04, 2023, 10:53:32 am »

What is your all time favourite TV show, Dear loud whispers , I could not open the links.If not offend, please tell me
Logged
问苍茫大地,谁主沉浮?我主沉浮!

Il Palazzo

  • Bay Watcher
  • And lo, the Dude did abide. And it was good.
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1282 on: August 04, 2023, 11:26:47 am »

Jesus, even Wikipedia is blocked in China?
He's talking about the Three Kingdoms tv series, from 2010.

So I have a question: are you using a machine translator when you post here? Google translate or something like that?
Nevermind. I see somebody already asked you this.
« Last Edit: August 04, 2023, 12:22:44 pm by Il Palazzo »
Logged

Gatleos

  • Bay Watcher
  • Mournhold... City of Light... City of MAGIC!
    • View Profile
    • Someone Sig This
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1283 on: August 04, 2023, 09:11:49 pm »

Three good movies to watch:

Ed Wood (1994) - Ensemble mock-rags-to-riches misfit biopic about a truly awful filmmaker and his friendship with Dracula himself. Watch this if you liked The Disaster Artist, and also if you didn't like The Disaster Artist. It's an all-time great of its genre.

Redline (2009) - A speedball-induced heart attack in animated film form by studio Madhouse (Perfect Blue, Paprika), and the closest thing to a proper F-Zero movie. Feels like an animated punk album cover kicking you in the nuts repeatedly.

The Apartment (1960) - A blackly humorous dramedy about a guy who's getting screwed over by the nepotistic corporate machine he works for. Shockingly funny, endlessly charming, and on the shortlist of "movies to show someone who doesn't like old movies".
Logged
Think of it like Sim City, except with rival mayors that seek to destroy your citizens by arming legions of homeless people and sending them to attack you.
Quote from: Moonshadow101
it would be funny to see babies spontaneously combust
Gat HQ (Sigtext)
++U+U++ // ,.,.@UUUUUUUU

zhijinghaofromchina

  • Bay Watcher
  • I am支景灏
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1284 on: August 06, 2023, 08:19:21 am »

WARNINGS :I have no intention in offending the friends here who are doing casino business ,if this post harms your profits , you can send me a personal message and I am going to extend my most sincerely apology.
DEAR MODERATORS :Maybe this post is offending the rule of the forums, if offending, I'd love to get any punishments.
PLEASE REMEMBER , IN THIS MOVIE THE ONLINE CASINOS ARE ILLEGAL, if any gentlemen wants to kill some time , I recommended you to go to somewhere that is legal.
Hey! My dear bay watchers , I've just seen a movie called 'No more bets' that has the Chinese name "孤注一掷",which is a classical Chinese idiom which means throwing out yourself to try to achieve your own goals when meeting critical conditions, this idiom also means desperate attempt.
Vividly depicting the desperate mentality of the gamblers who are caught in a scam , this movie exchanges grandiose anti-spoofing advertising into some tearful and lachrymatory small stories, which will definitely shock you. Considering that in many countries such as the USA and the Netherlands gambling is legal , it may be very hard for friends from their to get to understand this movie,but when you finished this movie you will get to understand the devil side of what is going on behind the scenes.This
 movie also reveals some links between the sexual crimes and the illegal gambling , which is truly educative.
By the way I watched this film with a friend who is going to be a policeman, he was totally amazed by how the Chinese police devoting themselves in fighting aganist the evil.
In the movie , the 'wise' student who caught in the scam suicide himself. I am afraid that I might caught a nightmare.
Logged
问苍茫大地,谁主沉浮?我主沉浮!

Starver

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1285 on: August 06, 2023, 01:06:13 pm »

Well, I don't think you're breaking forum rules. And I'm not aware of anyone here who maks their money from gambling (or, at least, nobody who makes it from the actual gamblers), and I'm not sure it'd be a significant problem even for them anyway. Film plots can be pro-/anti- many things and still a good plot if it's a decent treatment of the subject (however fanciful).

And just because there's legal gambling, anywhere, doesn't mean that there isn't also illegal gambling, at or beyond the edges, it could easily be seen as a warning against the kinds of problematic gambling that the usual access to it (legal or illegal) can always lead to in extreme cases.

Perhaps you could have used a spoiler on the end of the review, but had a quick look at what information there was about the film in the usual places and it is at least known about. Not sure if it'll become a big release, outside China/the West generally, it might if it's a reasonable film deemed worthwhile for a general release by those who know about these thngs. Even if it's strongly footed in (state-sanctined?) Chinese culture, there'll probably be an audience. Maybe or maybe not in the manner intended in its home market, but only time will tell.


This thread is an ecclectic mix of movie discussion (the last thing I posted talked about how I hadn't been to the cinema recently, and that isn't even as off-topic as I'm sure I have been. It would be interesting to learn more about what constitutes movie entertainment for you, probably. Not everything is Hollywood! There's Bollywood, for a start, and then Nollywood and the rest. ;)

(ZhiJingHao won't be able to read it, it seems, but food for thought on that front, for the rest of us...  8) )
Logged

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1286 on: August 08, 2023, 06:33:13 am »

What is your all time favourite TV show, Dear loud whispers , I could not open the links.If not offend, please tell me
2010 TV adaptation of Romance of the Three Kingdoms, sorry didn't know wikipedia was blocked in China

Also your anti-gambling post is fine! Some of my friends working in pubs and betting houses have seen some serious cases of gambling addiction, particularly old aged pensioners who just spend their entire day sitting in front of a gambling machine, who wait outside the shop even before the opening time so they can get inside straight away... Real sad. They know they are wasting away their money but can't stop!

Robsoie

  • Bay Watcher
  • Urist McAngry
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1287 on: August 09, 2023, 07:18:52 am »

Alzur's Legacy
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8307814/

A free Witcher fan movie of good quality that can be watched there :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GLtk2cLRu4
(fortunately for non-polish speaker like me, plenty of subtitles are available)

Really impressed me, can only dream of what could have been if those guys had the budget of the netflix shit show.

In case you wish to download the movie at a better quality than youtube compression, they give a link to it there :
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrPwcDdBNGscYuzTcPFZ2zw/community?lb=UgwL8UcqfxgiEsMPiAF4AaABCQ
Note : you can download SRT subtitles files from youtube using websites like this :
https://downsub.com/
Just make sure to have the SRT file having the same name as the movie file.
Logged

Il Palazzo

  • Bay Watcher
  • And lo, the Dude did abide. And it was good.
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1288 on: August 15, 2023, 08:31:32 am »

I've just rewatched Interstellar - and, man, I did not remember there being so much stilted, technobable-laden dialogue in it. It was almost too painful to watch. The score single-handedly saves the film, imo.
Logged

McTraveller

  • Bay Watcher
  • This text isn't very personal.
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1289 on: August 15, 2023, 12:39:15 pm »

Wow Guardians of the Galaxy vol 3 is pretty terrible.

EDIT: also... PG-13 lets you use F-bombs now?
« Last Edit: August 15, 2023, 12:49:39 pm by McTraveller »
Logged
This product contains deoxyribonucleic acid which is known to the State of California to cause cancer, reproductive harm, and other health issues.
Pages: 1 ... 84 85 [86] 87 88 ... 98