To be honest, I'm not entirely certain what I should do now. Before, I did try to make things clear and easy to remember, by condensing the data from previous posts into a spoiler with the important stuff. How do I do more than that? If I just post what I want, and PW or the committee posts what the appropriate cost and stats are, it kinda takes the fun out of tinkering. The only really creativity is just the base idea, rather than testing the idea and figuring out where it's applicable.
I understand your concern about making tinker too, ah, sterile and not creative. However, I hope you see the reason behind trying to ensure balance somewhat? Hmm, we'll have to try and find a middle ground between the fun of tinkering and working out solutions to technical challenges, and ensuring balance. Perhaps we just keep it like it is, bu with the designer trying to stay clear with pw what the end goal is or why he's asking for certain things, and with an additional round of looking at the end product and tweaking for game-reasons a bit? Or do you have a better idea?
The former is explicitly saying "It's not that good, BUT..."
That might be how you interpreted it, but that's not what was meant. Low damage, but very high rate of fire/volume of projectiles are what this thing does, no? So isn't it just the truth?
Again, they seem like bad attempts to polish a turd, and I think you'd be really good at polishing turds.
Perhaps, but I try not to do that, and instead spend my time with more worthwhile things than silly mindgames on an internet forum.
So seeing it poorly done makes me think you intentionally did it poorly, which implies a goal; I assumed your goal to be reducing my view of the weapon, as I had written the description to overplay it a bit, and it seemed like you thought that that overplayed description was my actual opinion rather than intentional aggrandizement.
Ah, you wound me. You still really think I spend time on crap like that? I just stated what I thought was what you were looking for (nice try to 'shift blame' to me though
I'll admit that you might have been searching for a more aggrandizing line, in which case I just didn't get the tone right yet. No subtle manipulating, just me not being able to read your thoughts and emotions to know what exactly you want (though having people in academics scream "ALWAYS BE OBJECTIVE" and "NO PURPLE PROSE ONLY FACTS YOU SHIT" at me might have something to do with it. Professor Drillsargeant can be so strict sometimes).
Is something like 'This weapon projects frankly irresponsible volumes of fire at targets at distressingly high speeds' more what you are searching for? If not, care to give me an example that would (that stays in-universe, mind you, like the other Armory items). Should it dazzle the mind with flashy new-age jargon? Promise potential buyers firepower heaven? Coax them by saying it attracts nubile young women?
Maybe if I'd thought about it longer than five seconds I'd have decided that was reading too much into it, and that you're just bad at aggrandizing things. But knee-jerk thinking is another bad habit of mine, as is probably obvious. >.>
No harm done, but remember how I said a while ago that not bothering going down in that particular rabbit hole was so much more productive? I think this proves that point a bit.