I've been reading some interesting stuff about the Chinese "social credit" system. I don't know all the ins and outs, but I know enough to say:
"every single article you've read about it is probably complete bullshit that doesn't in fact have a single thing to do with the social credit system".
And it's pretty easy to dissect. For example:
The Chinese government has developed a mobile app that tells users if they are near someone who is in debt. The app, called a "map of deadbeat debtors," flashes when the user is within 500 meters of a debtor and displays that person's exact location. TechSpot reports:
News of the app has caused quite a bit of controversy after it was originally reported by the state-run China Daily. It is an extension to China's existing "social credit" system which scores people based on how they act in public. The app is available through the WeChat platform which has become immensely popular in China. The government stated that "Deadbeat debtors in North China's Hebei province will find it more difficult to abscond as the Higher People's Court of Hebei on Monday introduced" the app. Once a user is alerted that they are close to a debtor, the user can then view their personal information. This will reveal their name, national ID number, and why they were added to the debtor list. The debtor can then be publicly shamed or reported to the authorities if it is deemed that they are capable of repaying their debts.
Here's the actual article:
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201901/16/WS5c3edfb8a3106c65c34e4d75.htmlFirst:
The Chinese government has
No, it turns out this was concocted by a single provinces' court system. So, it's a local government thingy in only that province. And not "The" Chinese government. If the high court in California did something would you say "THE" American government has done such-and-such?
has developed a mobile app
Uh, turns out there is no actual mobile app that has been developed. It's a thingy you subscribe to on WeChat, which is like Chinese twitter. Maybe that's quibbling, but Twitter bots and the like aren't really much of an "app".
It is an extension to China's existing "social credit" system
Well, it's actually not anything to do with the "social credit" system, so it's not any sort of "extension" of that. This is about people who've actually defaulted on actual money loans.
Also note "the government stated", when in fact there has been no official statement about the program whatsoever. The stated text was just the body of the article on China Daily. At best, "reporter at the China Daily stated" such-and-such. Sure, we can move the goalposts and say anything written in The China Daily is "the government stated" but that's stretching the definition of an official statement a little.
Similarly:
https://www.gamesradar.com/minus-10-social-credits-600-million-gamers-face-punishment-for-their-hobby-as-life-imitates-a-black-mirror-episode/Buying games could potentially lower your ‘social credit’ in China by 2020 if a new government scheme gains traction
Chinese gamers face direct ‘social penalties’, such as lack of access to Visa schemes and dating sites, as part of an upcoming surveillance program which rates citizens based on their economic and social behaviour. The Black Mirror style trial scheme discourages certain types of behaviour and can even penalise people for buying video games.
OK, where to start with this one.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-34592186First, these ideas were for a privately-owned social media site, and aren't part of any government designed program.
Second, they didn't say you'd be downrated for
buying games (both companies and governments in China
want people to buy stuff, duh), they said that if you played games for 10 hours a day that would look bad.
Third, it was just a random comment by some tech representative from the company, and they
don't in fact have any technology in place that can tell whether you "gamed for 10 hours a day".
Fourth, they didn't say that anyone would be blocked from "dating sites", they said that your rating would affect your placement in search results in the one specific dating site affliated with their social media site. Standard algorithm stuff, duh. Tinder does the same
So, really rather than whatever Gamesradar is saying, the actual story is that "a single employee of a Chinese Facebook equivalent throws out a vague idea using non-existent tech and how it could affect you search ranking in their affiliated dating site. BTW, they expose the numerical rating the algorithm gives you". Basically, the western media took a vague hypothetical from some loose-lipped Elon Musk type in China and turned it into a story about how it's real tech that's coming next year (totally!) and it's going to be run by the government.
Additionally the Sesame Credit Score idea isn't really much different to Facebook algorithms, except Sesame at least tells you you're being rated and gives you some of the criteria. Which is ... a damn sight better than
actual Facebook. That's the thing, as Orwellian as the "Sesame Credit" scoring system sounds, it's actually the same as what Facebook does, but
more transparent.
Additionally, a ton of other things that are supposedly something to do with the social credit system don't really have a whole lot to do with it. For example, there's mention of being blocked from expensive hotels, travel on the bullet train and first-class flight. but, if you look up those things, all of them were in fact rules for
debt defaulters or senior executives of companies who had legal breaches against them. Basically, it's not a whole lot different to how American courts garnish your wages: in China if you're forced by the courts to pay back debts then they also require you to travel economy class. This, again, can be debated, but fundamentally doesn't have anything at all to do with the main story "social credit system", and it's not even something that would be especially out of whack if proposed in America. It's not that far off from normal bankruptcy conditions. Lumping this stuff in with the social credit stories is just clickbait.
I haven't touched on what the social credit system is actually about, if you drill down, but almost all the stuff mentioned has very little to do with it. The Chinese government doesn't
really want to micro-manage peoples game purchases and the like, because the costs far outweigh the benefits.
In fact, if you look into it the Social Credit system seems to have a completely different purpose: to try and build up a "trust culture". Fraud and corruption are rampant, and the "social credit" system's original pitch was that it would cover 4 types of entities: (1) local governments, (2) private businesses, (3) judicial system and (4) individuals. It seems like every entity will be vetting the trustworthiness of every other type, and the actual core goal is to allow transactions without the absurd levels of distrust, fraud and corruption that exist at the moment. It seems more like a huge Yelp style system than anything else. The Chinese government seriously couldn't give a shit if you're playing a lot of MMOs, but they do give a shit about improving commerce and stamping out low-level corruption, and it makes a whole lot more sense that this is what they care about, rather than you bought too many video games, or where to place you on the search rankings for Chinese Tinder.