A noble sentiment, my friend but sadly it is not a sentiment shared by the majority and your politicians.As for Eastern European regionalism destroying what is built, what exactly is there being built ?We've been trying to get into the Schengen Space and look how's that going.When the British Government lifted the work restrictions on Bulgarians and Romanians everyone went apeshit and thought immigrants were invading Britain to steal jobs.
We've got freedom of movement, freedom of trade, a single currency, supernational jurisdiction, a space agency, etc etc. Sure, there's much left to do, but there's no denying that there's been great progress. And about the xenophobia: These things die down. Orwell mentioned in his letters that the English were very afraid of the Poles taking their jobs - that was in 1945, and nobody's talking about that anymore. It'll be the same here. (And AFAIK most of Eastern Europe is already in the Schengen area... Where are you from?)
You are assuming here that single currency, supernational jurisdiction, a space agency etc. are good thinks (note that I'm not arguing about freedom of movement/trade), which is non-obvious, for one thing, and not unrealistic to implement in Eastern European Union, for another (well, maybe it would be hard to pull off
another space agency, but we could have one shared by WEU and EEU (Western and Eastern European Unions), if we so desire, that's the smallest problem). Single currency is actually harmful to most countries that have it (have you heard about optimal currency region? I'm not sure about the English name, much less German, I'm re-translating it from Polish name here), supernational jurisdiction is... Controversial, from time to time, and so on. For example, current policy about agriculture is seriously wrong in my opinion. And the structural funds... Look below.
Greece: That country has massive structural problems: Corruption, a bloated administration, the rich not paying taxes... Europe isn't the cause of all the pain experienced by the Greek. It might have been handled better, but I wouldn't say it's been handled badly - had the EU not gotten involved, it would likely have gotten worse - and the crisis spread to other countries.
Well, I'm not sure if lack of EU involvement would make matters turn worse, but that's debatable, and likely not here. That said, EU has certainly make a lot to aggravate problems: it has ignored blatant lies from Greece regarding it's financial situation (for
years at that), and structural funds (the money for roads and stuff, you know what I mean) are actually often making corruption and disregard for the law much worse, because of their nature (I've recently read an article about that, but it was in Polish, so there is no sense in trying to find a link - it was in old-school paper magazine - it's quite a read actually, but to put long story short, when there is a sudden influx of money in the not-too-good system, it is not a good way to make it work better. It is also less controlled than the domestic funds, as the EU officials are further away and know less about what goes on in any particular country. I'm certainly not saying that they are inherently bad, but there might be more to them than meets the eye, and it should be kept in mind at all times when discussing EU involvement in various countries.
Case in point - after pumping some crazy amounts of money into innovations in Poland, the amount of innovations actually dropped.
Ukraine stuff: Who thinks reports about Russia reducing its troops on the border are correct?
I don't think so. I'd say that even if somebody is moving away from the border, it is to make room for other soldiers. But I've nothing to either prove that, or prove otherwise, so...