@Leafsnail:How does the massclaim help anything? You assert that it won't help mafia, but I couldn't disagree more. For instance, let's say an Infallible Alignment Cop claims. The mafia can now easily neutralize them with a recycle or a conversion.
...Uh, doesn't this go against everything we've discussed on that note of Cops? Yeah, neutralized--it could be said for quite everyone else. The only thing the Mafia has to fear are two things:
> Killers.
> People thinking.
Scum can't get miller, it is a town only ability.
>_> <_<
I did realize that in that post but it seems it's not in stone. I'm serious in the 'miller' claim but when I get to the bought it off part...yeah.
I think you are scum. You made an error yesterday by claiming an impossible result, and you've spent today panicking and trying to cover it up.
...Ok.
And you think I'd make a single post yesterday which contradicts my whole character-setup quite well as logical? Blatant. Hello~?
But at least you're being honest about this.
Oh. Well that is a pedantic non-point and it doesn't deserve a response.
Wow, such rudeness. I bothered with your pedantry too, y'know. Just as much as you not thinking equals the statement above this one deserves a response.
Well that is a pendantic point and it doesn't deserve a response.
Cut the comm line more, scumbag.
"Upon reflection"? Did you want to make it look like an inspect at the time or not? This is the core contradiction here.
Also note that, if it was meant to look like an inspection result, yes, you were trying to be misleading. Again this wouldn't be a problem if you had a clear explanation for what you were doing.
Read my bloody words. NO.I could see that it could be interpreted as an inspection result,
but that was not what I was aiming to give on that post. Goodness, must I repeat myself more and more to get the point across? Oh hello! Ask me that question again! Pretend like you care!
I did explain myself. Now if you had a problem about clarity,
you could bother to bloody ask instead of conclude.That's my Leafsnail's scumtell. Assertively concluding.
Lying and then failing to explain why is a major contradiction. Yes, I'm aware your blatantness means you couldn't have made an inspection day one. But I think you forgot about that or didn't realize that blatant triggered for day actions too, and only realized your mistake after Jack AT's result was displayed. Alternatively you were always planning to back down and smugly go "Nuh uh, I wasn't implying anything! I can't be blamed if you make simple logical inferences and mislead yourselves!"
But it seems you
bloody realized what I've been saying all along!And now say how obtuse it is. K.
...
What result?
Also, that is a plausible tangent to go on, sure. How am I expected to talk about that in a clear way if all you do is 'O NO TIRUIN DO WRONG NO SHE DO INSPECT AHAHA BACK DOWN.'
Goddamn.
You could easily have misunderstood the way blatant worked too - possibly thinking it only worked at night. In any case there is still a major contradiction in your actions which you haven't addressed.
Yes. Let's think Tiruin as a bloody idiot after not reading everything she bloody said. Let's say that there's a bloody
"major" contradiction
without saying what the hell it is in the first place.Unless you stated it as 'oh no Tiruin forgot!'
In which you aren't making it clearer.
That you're falling back on the vagueness of "I guess" just baffles me even more! How can you be unsure as to your own motivations?
OH DEAR GODS. YOU REALIZE HOW ILLOGICAL YOUR IDEA IS. I AM ASTOUND!
That was not at the foremost of your mind, but also at the same time you "guess part of that [your] intent was to make it look like an inspect result". How do I reconcile these ideas? Are you claiming to have Dissociative Identity Disorder? Are you saying you go into some kind of trance when making your posts? Help me out here.
Maybe its in how you read my posts, buddy.
Maybe its in your perspective.
Maybe its in how you conclude things.
Maybe its in how you tout I have a mental disorder.
Maybe its
in your perspective.Why are you such a jerk when you debate like this?
Yes that was the part where you contradicted yourself and confused me.
Contradict where.
You mentioned it and then lied about your use of it.
...Where again. Lied about the use of it, where.
Do I have to repeat you loving to take things at face value once again?
That isn't remotely worth spending 5 points on though.
So let's debate on the alignment cop power more with snipping at each other without going along something we're communicating on. Sure.
WHY IS IT NOT REMOTELY WORTH SPENDING 5 POINTS ON?!
I guess, but I don't think it's a major issue if everyone makes a clear decision at the end of the day. The town doesn't make better decisions if all its votes are spead out (I'd say it makes worse decisions due to mafia having more influence).
But then mass-voting. Bloodthirsty is only good if given to a few, and given the issue of it being town--it can also be a Mafia bonus.
Especially to those who like being vote-frenzy.
Why would that "explain" my earlier behavior?
Any consistent string of thought processes. Even "Oh shit, I messed up by making that post, oops" or "There was nothing wrong with that post, go away". But the thing is you haven't given me that. You've given me multiple explanations that don't match up with each other.
Ugh. it's in your perspective. Really. I had said that I did not intend that to be what I wanted it to be-but what my observations were. Not a cop inspect. Not anything else. On those multiple explanations, you fail to connect them all in which you do not state
how they don't match up despite multiple explanations. And further on the line, you resort to conclusion based
on the first thing you inferred anyway and now denounce everything I say.
Yes. That isn't consistent. Oh my.
I don't see why you'd claim if you weren't trying to encourage a massclaim.
How's about me claiming to make myself more of a target to scum, huh? That didn't pass your mind?
Author
Topic: Choose-Your-Own-Mafia - GAME OVER - TOWN VICTORY! (Read 98599 times)