Alright, let's see what we've got here.
Tawarochir: So, about yesterday...A few quick questions: did it not occur to you that perhaps I wanted answers to my questions? Why leap in with a "What Jack said" hammer? What kind of justification for a bandwagon hammer is your target already having plenty of votes already?
Not related to suspicion: How much prior Mafia experience do you have, and from where?
I find it pretty likely for Tiruin to be scum.
Indeed Tiruin was who I was nvestigating last night.
But the fact I still have my points, and as day actions resolve immediately, means that she obviously isn't whichever scum is running recycle/DaySap, so I think in this case it's more "the squeaky townie gets the noose".
Tack: What are your reasons for suspicion? What were your reasons for investigation? Also, you keep on missing Tiruin's review request.
Jack A T: what's the flavour on whoever you've scanned today?
I haven't inspected anyone today.
Count: 3 powers and autos
4maskwolf: This is true. 1 power, 2 autos. Now, I'm pretty sure you've got other stuff you need to post. Particularly on your approach to a flaw called "blatant" and some questions asked about your approach. Perhaps you will be willing to post about that, eh, instead of just popping on to the thread to list possible actions and then going offline?
Tiruin: This is going to be a bit long.
Oh, and I inflated Kill. :3
No I didn't but what would YOU like to know.
Actually, I totes did.
(Sups omitted)
Why would you inflate Kill? Since mafia have access to the infinitely better Convert for one more it's basically a town ability.
...You seriously like taking my word at face value, huh.
No, I didn't inflate kill. I inflated Resurrect.
...what are you even doing, Tiruin? Are you seriously making snarky remarks at Leafsnail for assuming you were making a serious claim when asking you why you took your claimed action? Why did you lie about your action in the first place?
Quickpost
P-Luke is innocent.
Ah, that is the second or so post Tiruin did because life stuffs! I shouted out my best apparent opinion on the subject based on the notes I took while reading--not skimming--through the list. It is connected with the argument on Jack A T's theorem on Millers and whatever point-based planning was discussed earlier but also takes in the how and why people are judged. I didn't know he was town, if that's what you're assuming (and something more, I believe, my leafy friend?) but by better judgement, I inferred that he was townier than the rest.
I see a huge difference here between what you said and what you're saying you were thinking. Namely, the latter is a statement of opinion. You say you
thought P-Luke was town, but did not
know.
That is certainly not what you said Day 1. What you said Day 1 was a statement of fact: P-Luke
is innocent. Such information would only be available to one group: the scum. (While town infallible daycops could theoretically have had such information had NQT been handling day actions as he said they would be handled in the day action description, NQT was not. Instead, NQT had all Day 1 actions take effect at the end of Day 1.)
What I got from your post was that you were faking an inspect. There was no possible way town, aside from P-Luke could have the information you were claiming to have: knowledge that P-Luke was definitely town. ...Then today, you say that you were just stating your opinion as if it were fact. What.
...You're insinuating negatives over anything else, huh. But matters first, explicitly town?
Interesting wording.
Yes, it is quite interesting wording. What I find most interesting about it is the fact that Leafsnail never used it. In fact, your post here is the first use of the word "explicitly" in the entire thread.
On millers: My whole argument on millers was mechanical: they're not easy to fake, and only town can have the flaw. The whole argument hinged on the NQT note you missed. In a normal game, they would theoretically be nulltells if all people played optimally. Here, they're mild towntells, due to mechanical difficulty for scum to fake. Not overwhelming (not even close), but not perfect neutral.
Tiruin, I'd be voting you right now if your posts today hadn't been made in such a poor condition. Right now, I want to see you, after you've rested and at least somewhat recovered, try to better explain your actions. Why try to fake an inspect (and yes, I know you said it wasn't the main goal in that post, but still)? Why state opinion as fact? Why lie to everyone about your inflate target initially? What exactly made you think P-Luke was town?
Oh, and because I brought it up:
NQT: Would you be so kind as to tell us all how you handled Day 1's day actions, including when you would have theoretically processed them?