Ok then:
On another note, how was I supposed to respond to IG's argument? He called me scum. That is the basis of his theory. By providing an alternate theory, it gives reason that there is more than one. His accusation was that since he Roleblocked me, and no one died, it must obviously be me. I'm pointing out that there are other cases that could've occurred, even something similar to the no kill on N1.
...Because you targeted the claimed cop, for one? I mean, if you're going to poke the Cop, then poke the rest of her case...
As we've already seen, none of the roles so far is exclusive to town or mafia. You could still be scum, no matter your role. I don't see how claiming cop absolves you of being scum.
For instance, you could be scum and TDS is your scumbuddy. Or you could be proclaiming him innocent to verify you are town. Also, the rest of your inspects are dead, and you claimed them after you died.
...
...
You're tired, aren't you. :v
Your semantics is breaking up there.
Though query on the Orange part: Explain. Next, explain the first portion.
Persus: Explain again how you say you didn't use your Militia Captain skills but were able to Kill?
Also, that means ONE KILL IS NOT ACCOUNTED FOR POST-N2 if we are to assume one was a NK.
Because I can kill and suck people's blood because I'm a vampire.
I also had my oneshot Militia Captain kill, but my understanding of that power was I could use it to kill or I could use it to protect, but not both. Since I used that protect last night, I can't use the militia kill. Which means someone hasn't claimed a vig kill.
In which you're now a killer~
I've stated I have a kill before.
I know that. I mean I'm emphasizing that you can ONLY kill now.
ALright, Pufferfish. Either some one is lying about their role, or Puff is lying about not carrying out a vig kill. Judging from people's role descriptions, I doubt there would be a secret vig, so I think Puff lied about not using his kill. Since I see no reason for Puff to lie unless it was that he was scum.
In retrospect, that's a very weird reason to not claim-I'm verging more of him misunderstanding his role.
EXPLAIN. I can't think of an alternative to this, and I don't understand what alternative case you are trying to provide.
...Why
wouldn't Pufferfish claim a kill?
That was what I was thinking.
It didn't make sense.
What is your take on the matter?
Persus also is seemingly ignoring what I'm asking him in my posts.
Sorry, I was about to head to sleep, then I realized that the N2 vig kill was still unaccounted for.
Persus has a funny role.
Persus also is seemingly ignoring what I'm asking him in my posts.
Persus: Explain again how you say you didn't use your Militia Captain skills but were able to Kill?
Also, that means ONE KILL IS NOT ACCOUNTED FOR POST-N2 if we are to assume one was a NK.
Because I can kill and suck people's blood because I'm a vampire.
I also had my oneshot Militia Captain kill, but my understanding of that power was I could use it to kill or I could use it to protect, but not both. Since I used that protect last night, I can't use the militia kill. Which means someone hasn't claimed a vig kill.
In which you're now a killer~
ALright, Pufferfish. Either some one is lying about their role, or Puff is lying about not carrying out a vig kill. Judging from people's role descriptions, I doubt there would be a secret vig, so I think Puff lied about not using his kill. Since I see no reason for Puff to lie unless it was that he was scum.
In retrospect, that's a very weird reason to not claim-I'm verging more of him misunderstanding his role.
Could I please get an answer to:
I'd be alright with a Tiruin or a WhitiusOpus lynch, but I have to go with Tiruin.
I already did Persus.
You seem to be ignoring my statements entirely.
Explain the statement above, bloodsucker.
But it's done anyways. Tell me:
Did you skip this post at all?Could I please get an answer to:
I'd be alright with a Tiruin or a WhitiusOpus lynch, but I have to go with Tiruin.
I already did Persus.
You seem to be ignoring my statements entirely.
Explain the statement above, bloodsucker.
You're attacking me based on misinterpretations of what I'm saying. You did so at the beginning of the day, then switched to bandwagoning on WhitiusOpus when Imperial voted him. Meanwhile, SBC's sole vote in the game was on WhitiusOpus, and SBC said Whitius was his top scumpick at least once.
*pokes in ribs*
You say I'm 'bandwagoning'.
You do not even dispute what I said in my explanation.
...
I verily say I am suspecting you more and more of being scum, and being allied with WO and claiming 'vampire' as an alibi given this brand of logic.
While it is arguable that what SBC did was a town-push move (or he's actually talking to town), he...also claimed himself out as scum in his list of reads.
Given his
laziness as scum, (which I hate and am disgusted by), I'd rather look into the essence of his vote if you're using it as evidence.
He did vote Whitius, but on vague reasoning. He claims active lurking! I asked him about that.
I got no answer.
Also your point on me attacking based on 'misinterpretations'? No. I attacked you on valid points that are of mention if we are to understand this vampire Militia Captain. Did you claim you have a role-kill when you claimed Militia Captain?
I think not.
Looking back?
You did
NOT.
You could use this clue below as an excuse:
I killed flabort because I thought from the vote distribution at the end of day yesterday that he was scum, and my role requirement that I kill every three nights to satisfy my hunger. (looks like I miscalculated).
But I asked you on it several times. Only later on did you say it was role-related.
I believe someone with an imperative to remember his own role would claim as much info as that straight up, but to allay that suspicion:
Why didn't you?Given that, if I had to chose between lynching Whitius and lynching you, I'd go with lynching you.
Puff it up, Persus. You were just about to do so last moment
right before the day end: Why didn't you? I still fail to see any answer to it.
Your wordings as of late? Trivial.
They're not of depth in trying to scrutinize others. They just poke at fluff and superficial observation.
I want a case from you. I want a case from WhitiusOpus. Both have not presented arguable statements which back up their votes.