((Well, actually, I vowed to myself to support your 'war effort clause' and work not for personal amusement here, but on things useful to the ARM overall. With fleshknitter being still mostly unknown factor, both the current mission (partially, but nonetheless) and MCP-II production (a lot more) sort of depend on how much it can actually be relied upon, and I really wanted the stasis side effects be sorted out. Guess it's my fault I did not make it clear from the post.
Contributing to the war effort from a slightly different angle, because Steve knows there's much enough people working on armaments of destruction, but nearly not enough on basic things to save lives. And I am making effort to think of ways to advance in that direction.
Oh, and I accept all responsibility for what happens because of this. This is clear and unabashed breech of tinker use agreement. Yet as I once again feel ashamed to even try doing something wrong on mission, I prefer to do wrong here, and accept the consequences here. As I have figured just minutes after posting that initial message, I actually don't much care if the action does not get resolved at all. It's the 'doing something distinct' for a change and 'waiting for GM's response' that is pure crack that keeps bringing me back to ER. I just saw the opening, offering nothing but massive electrical trauma, yes, but opening for an action to contribute to the cause, and shamelessly exploited the possibility. ))
Piecewise, I ask that you treat each case justly and only against itself. Do not let RC be punished for my impudence. He deserves to ask questions.