I guess they wouldn't negotiate if they didn't have too.
The protestors themselves don't seem to be all too keen on compromising, and the demands of the protestors are not necessarily in the interests of those who made this compromise.
"The Opposition" here refer specifically to Vitali Klitschko and his Ukranian Democratic Alliance for Reform party.
He has certainly cast his lot with the protestors, but he is
also is a politician and member of the government, as are the rest of the "opposition" that did the negotiation.
The things that are best for the politicians that brokered the agreement aren't necessarily the things that are best for the people on the street risking their lives.
And he is a far cry from representing the protestors as a whole - without their support, the agreement is meaningless.
On the ground:
“We’re afraid the politicians -- from both sides, yes, from the opposition, too -- will cheat us again,” Sergiy said.
Imagine in the US if Harry Reid presumed to speak for Occupy, or Bohner for the entire tea party. That's the situation you've get here - the establishment negotiating with itself. No guarantee people will actually be left happy with the result of that. No member of the protests that wasn't already a member of the establishment has, to my knowledge, even been invited to the negotiating table.
UkrainianRanger - What's your take on the situation? Also, the guy who got freed was arrested for embezzling and some Russian deal, right? Do you think his release was important and the charges a farce, or do you just see it as the politicians looking after their own and seizing the opportunity to push their own agenda?