TBH Sheb, there were reports of people looting police barracks in previous days. So in theory, that could support the idea of some secret organization using theoretically stolen police gear and pose as police members with intent of just fueling things up.
However, yellow stripes being used to mark NON-police member still doestn't sit quite right with me.
Pictures like the 9th in this article is one of reasons why.I don't see how supposed provocateurs would infiltrate normal police in such efficient way they could just casually sit right next to each other.
You COULD argue however that, given how much police is on the scene, one could try faking he's from "that unit from that town you don't know much about but know it exist" and maybe pass with this?? But the sheer amount of yellow-striped ones vs. "normal" police...I dunno, this just doesn't add up. Sorry, webber.
...unless, you know, those guys ARE part of some highly trained and competent organization that orchestrated whole police gear looting, issued fake IDs & cover stories for their agents and sent them out in the field with sole mission to plunge this nation into civil war which would be extremely profitable for said organization.
I mean, that's Tom Clancy's material, but theoretically possible, I guess??
edit: dammit, I try to post but so many answers while I'm writing...and then the forums crash. THEY COULDN'T HANDLE
Anyway - sorry webber, but that won't do. It makes no sense, there is NO heel there, nothing to hold it actually. By what that line is showing, that guy might as well be wearing sandals. I mean, just look at it from afar!
And one more thing - compare it to the shoe he is wearing on the other foot. Heel is clearly visible there.
But enough of shoes - guess if those guys really are titushki, then webber was right in they not being police...but again, they are probably not part of conspiracy either.
In other news - I stopped watching BBC videos in their "live coverage" article as it was just some old footage, very slowly being updated with newer information. Their tweeter feed was more active.
I check it again now and there are pretty strong worded articles there now - talking about "bloodshed", "protesters mercilessly gunned down" etc. as opposed to more neutral tone in the noon. There is also footage of protester using a rifle. All in all, seems like this news exploded even more with the "western" media, so here's another info for Comrade P.