Mictlantecuhtli:
Whats so confusing?
My claims are simple and clear. a revolution to overthrow an elected government was done partially and greatly by the hands of neo-nazis and the west is cheering for it.
that channel 4 link was used solely for this part (although, its idiotic i had to even support this known fact):
"In December US senator John McCain travelled to Ukraine to offer his support to the opposition, appearing on stage with leaders of the three opposition parties leading the protests - including the far-right Svoboda party.
Svoboda is currently Ukraine's fourth biggest party and holds 36 seats in parliament. It is also part of the Alliance of European National Movements, along with the BNP and Hungary's Jobbik.
Svoboda leader Oleh Tyahnybok is one of the faces of the protests, appearing regularly along with opposition leader and former boxer Vitali Klitschko (see picture right) voicing opposition to Putin's influence over the region."
Do you claim those facts are false? i guess you don't.
And please stop trying to belittle me, this is both insulting to me, to this board and to your intelligence.
sinistar - those yellow arm bands they are talking about are NOT related to the picture webber shown.
Jeb:
parties evolve is a very bad argument because as far as we know, that evolution is merely an outward evolution. paint a donkey with stripes and he will still remain a doneky, not a zebra. this is PR at its finest. the key figures remained the same. do you actually believe that an openly admitted neo-nazi (anyone who is a memeber of a neo-nazi party is neo-nazi and openly admit it, agreed?) suddenly turns out just nationalist? that he saw the light? i find it hard to believe. the more likely scenario is that svoboda knew they had to moderate their IMAGE if they wanted to survive politically.