Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 20

Author Topic: Postmodernism vs Bay12 - Deathmatch 2014. aka feminist programming languages  (Read 29233 times)

Reelya

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Towards feminist programming languages
« Reply #150 on: January 21, 2014, 08:55:17 pm »

S'ok. Setting up gags excuses anything. Meanwhile, I came across this:

 http://qntm.org/gay

Who knew that gay database design made a lot more sense than feminist programming languages?
« Last Edit: January 21, 2014, 09:19:42 pm by Reelya »
Logged

Aqizzar

  • Bay Watcher
  • There is no 'U'.
    • View Profile
Re: Towards feminist programming languages
« Reply #151 on: January 21, 2014, 09:44:16 pm »

Meanwhile, I came across this:

 http://qntm.org/gay

Who knew that gay database design made a lot more sense than feminist programming languages?

As a database designer myself, this is an article after my own heart.  Also, anyone working with a SQL-style database who doesn't understand the power of cross-reference meta-tables deserves to be taken out in the street and shot...

Speaking of which, I'm pretty sure the database template my company uses for personal information stores gender as a boolean.  I don't remember which value counts as "true".
Logged
And here is where my beef pops up like a looming awkward boner.
Please amplify your relaxed states.
Quote from: PTTG??
The ancients built these quote pyramids to forever store vast quantities of rage.

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: Towards feminist programming languages
« Reply #152 on: January 21, 2014, 09:55:05 pm »

Define Gender as Boolean

Intersexed persons are not allowed! Their existence is against the EULA for this site, because their gender causes problems with our servers!
Logged

Willfor

  • Bay Watcher
  • The great magmaman adventurer. I do it for hugs.
    • View Profile
Re: Towards feminist programming languages
« Reply #153 on: January 21, 2014, 09:59:58 pm »

Intersexed relates to sex, not gender. Sex being hardware, and gender being software in the most reductionist sort of metaphor. But yes, it is problematic.
Logged
In the wells of livestock vans with shells and garden sands /
Iron mixed with oxygen as per the laws of chemistry and chance /
A shape was roughly human, it was only roughly human /
Apparition eyes / Apparition eyes / Knock, apparition, knock / Eyes, apparition eyes /

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: Towards feminist programming languages
« Reply #154 on: January 21, 2014, 10:09:03 pm »

Some intersexed persons consider their physiological status as being either bi-gendered, or "third gendered".

For instance, Germany has now officially accepted "I" in addtion to "M" and "F".

You can't have a 3rd option, and still use a boolean.

I was making fun of the policies that companies often have concerning activities that degrade server performance, and saying that people with the third gender are not allowed, and will be prosecuted.
Logged

Aqizzar

  • Bay Watcher
  • There is no 'U'.
    • View Profile
Re: Towards feminist programming languages
« Reply #155 on: January 21, 2014, 10:12:46 pm »

You can't have a 3rd option, and still use a boolean.

True, false, and null.  Which would be... kinda appropriate, provided your table design allows it.

Still not sure which value equals which.  I guess if "false = 0 / true = 1" then "female = false / male = 1", for the same reason sockets and plugs are named how they are.
Logged
And here is where my beef pops up like a looming awkward boner.
Please amplify your relaxed states.
Quote from: PTTG??
The ancients built these quote pyramids to forever store vast quantities of rage.

i2amroy

  • Bay Watcher
  • Cats, ruling the world one dwarf at a time
    • View Profile
Re: Towards feminist programming languages
« Reply #156 on: January 21, 2014, 10:13:56 pm »

I used this example, because it is literally exactly what the guy said to my face. If I'd been making one up, I would have gone one better.

No, i looked at it. Tell me which numeral base you can use to make 2+2=4.3. I tried, it cannot be done. Not even by allowing fractional bases.

It's only possible if you change what "2" means, what "4" means and what the point sign "." mean. But that's clearly not what the guy was saying.
You can actually do it with a simple zero-point redefinition (similar to that used in programming for zero-based numbering systems). If we redefine the zero point of our numerical system to a value of -.3 (meaning the new value of "0" is equivalent to the normal system's value of .3) then the math works out wonderfully, with 2 + 2 = 4 in the new system being the equivalent of 2.3 + 2.3 = 4.6 in the "normal" one. Such a system would probably be called a ".7-based numbering system", since .7 would be the first "integer" of said system, and would indeed be mathematically valid.

That said there's no practical reason to use such a system, regardless of it's mathematical validity. One of the few reasons we use zero-based systems is due to some improvements in computing certain algorithms, but a .7-based system would have no such advantages and therefore would have no valid reasons for it's use over that of our normal 1-based numbering system or some computing process's zero-based numbering system.

And yeah, the idea that things like logic can be influenced by political and cultural ideas is really stupid. To reference a xkcd comic:

Logic. It works, bitches.
Logged
Quote from: PTTG
It would be brutally difficult and probably won't work. In other words, it's absolutely dwarven!
Cataclysm: Dark Days Ahead - A fun zombie survival rougelike that I'm dev-ing for.

LeoLeonardoIII

  • Bay Watcher
  • Plump Helmet McWhiskey
    • View Profile
Re: Towards feminist programming languages
« Reply #157 on: January 22, 2014, 01:10:24 am »

The gender Boolean database thing works though. You say, "Please fill out this web form to do business with us" and the person can decide if they want socks from you or not. The form could just as easily read "Select vagina, penis, or nothing".

A nice troll would be to sign up to a feminist forum you have to give your gender but the dropdown only has "Male" and "Other".
Logged
The Expedition Map
Basement Stuck
Treebanned
Haunter of Birthday Cakes, Bearded Hamburger, Intensely Off-Topic

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: Towards feminist programming languages
« Reply #158 on: January 22, 2014, 01:15:35 am »

Except in the real world, leaving a null in the gender boolean field will have the form checker tell you that you must choose a gender. (So the advertising partners know to send you either viagra ads, or boobjob ads.)

The null condition is checked to make sure you supplied information. Not to see if you are intersexed. Again, intersexed people aren't allowed, because it messes with the system.
Logged

alexandertnt

  • Bay Watcher
  • (map 'list (lambda (post) (+ post awesome)) posts)
    • View Profile
Re: Towards feminist programming languages
« Reply #159 on: January 22, 2014, 01:56:03 am »

That depends on the form. Nothing stopping you from using null as a third option internally.
Logged
This is when I imagine the hilarity which may happen if certain things are glichy. Such as targeting your own body parts to eat.

You eat your own head
YOU HAVE BEEN STRUCK DOWN!

da_nang

  • Bay Watcher
  • Argonian Overlord
    • View Profile
Re: Towards feminist programming languages
« Reply #160 on: January 22, 2014, 04:01:48 am »

Does anyone object to using enums instead of boolean?
Logged
"Deliver yesterday, code today, think tomorrow."
Ceterum censeo Unionem Europaeam esse delendam.
Future supplanter of humanity.

Max White

  • Bay Watcher
  • Still not hollowed!
    • View Profile
Re: Towards feminist programming languages
« Reply #161 on: January 22, 2014, 04:15:14 am »

You can't have a 3rd option, and still use a boolean.

True, false, and null.  Which would be... kinda appropriate, provided your table design allows it.
Actually that is very language specific. Nullable booleans are a feature of more higher level languages typical these days, but there was a point in the past where they didn't real. Your boolean is actually a pointer to a boolean, and that boolean may only be true of false, but the pointer may be null.

alexandertnt

  • Bay Watcher
  • (map 'list (lambda (post) (+ post awesome)) posts)
    • View Profile
Re: Towards feminist programming languages
« Reply #162 on: January 22, 2014, 05:20:21 am »

No boolean in any language is actually a single bit as far as I know (unless you get technical and funky with boolean arrays). So in some languages it is possible to allocate values other than true and false to a bool.

But sane people use enums.
Logged
This is when I imagine the hilarity which may happen if certain things are glichy. Such as targeting your own body parts to eat.

You eat your own head
YOU HAVE BEEN STRUCK DOWN!

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: Towards feminist programming languages
« Reply #163 on: January 22, 2014, 05:31:26 am »

Regardless, using the undefined "else" trap handler as an implicit value rather than as a trap handler, means you lose the functionality of the trap handler, and that is poor practice.

You really should consider switching to unsigned short integer instead, even though it uses many more bits than just 1. There are many other kinds of legally recognized third gender, after all. India has at least 2 others that I know of. That would bring the number of possible values up to 5, which is greater than what you can store in 2 bits. (well, 2 bits, plus undefined state.)


Seriously, outside of the arbitrary box of western culture, gender is far from boolean in nature.  As things like the LBGT community gain in support, silly notions like "Gender = (1 XOR 0)" are going to disapear, and if you care about maintainable code, you should avoid using boolean there.
« Last Edit: January 22, 2014, 05:37:20 am by wierd »
Logged

Max White

  • Bay Watcher
  • Still not hollowed!
    • View Profile
Re: Towards feminist programming languages
« Reply #164 on: January 22, 2014, 05:40:29 am »

Well there was a point in time when you had to care about disc space, and storing gender as a single bit was ideal for practical purposes. Luckily we are past that, and these days proper design would dictate that you have a 'Gender' class. Even if you only ever have need for two instances, conceptually it is the best option.
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 20