So it seems that attempts at a multi-vote wind up as a no-lynch vote. I'll keep that in mind for if any future vote shenanigans crop up.
Unvote for now.
I guess Web's taking it..taking
everything as an in-class context.
"You try voting multiple people--how does that make sense?! You're indecisive."
...
Therefore there is 'no lynch'.
LeafsnailI still don't see how any of this remotely constitutes a case against me. Your first point seems to be "You called NQT scum, but I think NQT is town". Ok, why do you think NQT is town (in spite of the fact that his claim makes absolutely no sense)? Why does NQT being town make me scum?
Let's start off with how you started a case against NQT. You firstly assumed the Bellsounder Mafia-applying its kind of logic onto him.
How can he defend against that?
Next, I repeatedly state that I believe you are
scummier due to context compared to NQT-I AM NOT SURE NQT IS TOWN, given my earlier notes on him! I fairly believe that you've missed that, and instead are relying on repetition to get the point across? Or possibly, subvert what I'm trying to say to put malice into it?
It is not that, but that i have detected malice
in your intent instead. I will get to this later.
Your "scum can nightkill" point is incredibly weak. Even non-bastard games can have useless roles (eg, the presence of a Mafia Ninja does not guarantee that the town has a tracker), and even if we assume "roles have to be useful" it doesn't follow that evil people can kill or that NQT cannot convert people. The protection could protect someone from an advanced doppelganger attack, for instance. But even if we accept that scum can nightkill I don't see how that changes anything.
I love how 'useless' my portable power is. That's a pretty nice deflection of
a power that exists. This more than not edges me towards you being scum--other than question the point, you attack it
without the essence or detail of curiosity.
I'll redirect your 'weak' point in this. Orange part. It is
more than not, believable and your attempt to shut it down? Painted as scum.
> We're freed from class everyday. Every "day" is when we are at class. I believe we may be attacked by said element when we are
not at class. Remember how Toony's Love Mafia played out? The one where you won as a third-party? Relate that example.
But even if we accept that scum can nightkill I don't see how that changes anything.
"Even if" is a real certainty. So let's say scum can't nightkill--
why the heck do you think team 'Evil' is supposed to have that in the first place? Why not give note of it and refute my case there and then? "Incredibly weak" my third toe. The counterpoint you offer is just base speculation--it tried to outguess the damn setup, even! It does not directly attack my case, is what I'm saying.
I do not understand your last point at all. How do you know there's a "direct game mechanic to these 'moral abstract concepts' of Evil and such", and how does that contradict what I've said? The second part of that sentence seems to just be echoing what I've claimed so I don't see what that has to do with anything.
*
Tiruin points to relevance.
Aaaaand, your gender and stuff are in your roles. If you're not told you're Evil, you're not Evil. Have fun. Ask away, foolish fools. I'm sure I forgot to explain something.
Detail to me the importance of this orange point here. Maybe you'll understand my point--I also want to understand yours. This schism of aggression may be caused because wow, super-bastard (instead of semi-bastard) game we're having wherein there is lacking scum. How great is that?
The fun thing is EVERYONE ELSE IS BEING DAMN LAZY. Recent posts consist of team evil, and lacking Team everyoneelse. NQT speaks in brevity. Heck, I'm already willing to give this up because LACKING PARTICIPATION.Anyway, rant aside.
Point: A clear explanation of what you're accusing me of, and why it makes me scum or a better lynch candidate than NQT
Explanation: The reasoning and evidence that leads up to the accusation you make in the Point section
*Grumble grumble. :I*
Point: There is Evil, and there is Not Evil. It is a mechanic.
Explanation: It matters to the context of Mafia. There are at least two contending sides. Best case: It matters to the game and this type of thinking is debatable.
Problem: Lynch an Evil person, let's check what's up.
Counter-Point: I am confused, partly, by this method--why would "scum" [if Evil, therefore scum] all-claim? There's the matter of the Innocent Child*, which will be addressed later.
Point: Bastard game. I can sincerely doubt NQT being an Innocent Child as a bastard mechanic.
Explanation: His actions, more than my speculation-at-hand, are scummy. Promises?
Counter-Point: It makes sense however, that if the notion of his...play is discarded (this is my viewpoint NQT. Don't go ballistic on me), then the only scummy point left is that he mentioned 'hey doods, don't lynch my and info comes tomorrow, kay'? Wherein I don't really see anything wrong with letting him live another day.
> If Cult--he's the Cult Leader. We kill him, he can't do anymorestuffs.
> If Parasite (think GlyphGryph's Imperial-Rebel game. Machinator-Parasite) - Then we'd be pretty sure of what happened as there are clues in flavor.
> If scum--thrice damn this cheap play, is all I can say. But that is very doubtful by the essence of it: It would be a fairly bastard (which is more than even a semi-bastard, and webadict is a good judge of character) game to have this 'Innocent Child' be a total backstabber here.
> We have contenders against him-their cases (discarding those obv-bandwagoners [yeah guys. I am also disappointed in you for not trying.) are also of suspect to make sense for a NQT lynch. I myself have my own case to doubt him given the bastard-prospect of this game, but it doesn't hold to good logic.
Point: Part of your example--which is lacking in mention as you see NQT now, is that you
also blame the mods as reason to vote him. This is a scumpoint.
Explanation: If this is a scum ploy-it's cheap. If it isn't then that ONE mechanic we're all seeing and basing most things on (See: Point 1) is where webadict lied--though personally? It'd be better if he played it like Vector. "I've lied to you once or even twice thus far."
Anyway. Your whole case on NQT are counter-arguments on him, and ever since I've advocated a non-lynch to him, you've gone
hostile to me too. "Where is the questioning Leafsnail I've known and loved" holds here-you don't diplomatically assess the situation. You state in exacts of 'Town' and 'Scum'. Continued below, too.
It's like you're snipping between the lines on information that you can say-but don't want to say. Lacking wording when there's a 'feeling' that there'd be more.
Point 4 is in a rant below.
However, for posterity-if NQT is scum (third-party or whatever), then I am fully justified in saying he's playing
poorly. He gives little much amounting to NOTHING in his defense, if we discard the promise of 'survival until tomorrow' and most importantly: "this seems bad to talk about in public because [Team Evil] the scumteam are at an advantage" as a reason--and I will not accept that emotional rant he mentioned earlier as an alibi,
now. I know how that feels-I've gone through that more than anyone here-and darn well does it suck in knowing he's not posting anything as of recent note.
And is active. (Or as far active as checking his account is).
Counter point to that?: Team Evil has no comment--NOR is Leafsnail or anyone else advocating that WHAT NQT SAYS IS A GOOD IDEA. In bastard games, scum are almost
always at an advantage given the breach in information--or at least have a greater advantage than Town in knowing what is going on!
NQT: To probably please your ego; we're all idiots. Happy? Your attitude, however, does not conform to a true president (I can state the gap in how you played before as to how you're doing now [but if its RL, you don't mention it] wherein you don't detail, at all, in recent times what your thoughts are).
Do you understand that withholding information bakes you out as a nice target for scum?
PS:
Today seems to be my grumpy day so...no malice intended. :X Just preeeeetty grrr at myself because of scheduled stuff and me breaking down under sadness and sadness and not doing anything because apathy argh. I'm not even inclined towards apathy. T_T