Look, I can't quite grasp jokes that well... it, err..was-I wasn't brought up well in taking jokes right. I would've countered your 'let's remember this game as the Innocent Child who cried Wolf', but that'd just be mean whether or not it is true, aye?
But..that vibe. I can more clearly that not see where Leafsnail is heading in agreement with the vote on you-I can assume one thing that he is particularly keen in seeing you dead if:
> Evil = scum,
> They lied about the groupchat,
> Cado claimed to lessen the suspicion, then WIFOM us into counter-belief, but that'd be darn gutsy. However, everyone claimed-numbers match. Similarities are seen, even in trace amounts.
However a benevolent factor, as a minor note, is that he has a different perspective--oh, and Cado did claim direct meteor summoner; TDS and Cado, however, have mistaken Evil as...well, the adage of 'teenagers are evil'.
Which I'd impute to Webadict's terminology. (possible player-Webadict and not webadict-person/mod)
Which is flatout crazy. There are at least two sides against each other in a Mafia game. If untrue-then this whole game must have one recourse as a general goal: Love, or probably something else. I can probably conclude the former, but the latter and the former both lie in vagueness. Why?
I can't glean
anything at all from my role. No wincon. No subtlety. No malevolent/benevolent note other than I'm not told I'm Evil or whatever--and as said:
Aaaaand, your gender and stuff are in your roles. If you're not told you're Evil, you're not Evil. Have fun. Ask away, foolish fools. I'm sure I forgot to explain something.
Which 'splains two definite concepts. Evil, and Not Evil. That's it.
What I'm doing now is explaining my thoughts.
But it seems absurd to me to let the player that the mod has said is not evil die on day one in a game where the mod has said they won't outright lie before you even know what 'evil' and 'not evil' might really mean in the setting.
I takeback in turn what I said, however I would like the 'inconsiderate' note to linger.
When I said inconsiderate, I say it in that in all your posts-not one has spoken to me of you considering the notion from our PoV. You do not consider or consolidate those matters and address them as suspicion towards you. While using your role as an explanation is valid, you've only done that and..quite not much else other than rebound onto Leafsnail.
Hmm. Let's see-reconsidering the majority notion, why don't we try one other thing:
I'll set these objectives to prove.
> All Evil people are Meteor Summoners.
> Everyone else but Leafsnail; TheDarkStar and RangerCado are Evil, and against the Town-those who are flailing about. (I speak figuratively)
> NQT has the verdict in her hands. (Note n page 5, first web' official post.*)
* - Flavor does have a tangible effect, and we may also use that as a tool.
> The Evil/Non Evil schism is caused by NQT's perception or past (due to our start
in media res) towards us
That said,
Leafsnail.However,
NQT: I see quite a considerable difference in..information, nothing you've done before-as town, too-but..it is intriguing. You promise something D2, something that intrigues curiosity. What is it that you know, and still hide-that you'd only divulge in the matters of you living through the night?