So I lost a post and
PFP. Probably would not be able to get back later on. Argh this connection.
In short: Linked and summarized reads of everyone, leading back to
ToonyMan for lacking conviction, and quick dispositional changes. While the logical train is subtle, I see gaps between how posts connect (other than the first posts of the day, ignore that given that I expect you to ignore them.)
Toony: Excuse my poke at your activity, but I'm partly unhappy at the amount of substance you put at D3 start. Like, there was a total shift from how much content you did in D2. RL stuffs, yes, but the shift...still exists as a bad feeling on my part.
Standing queries:
Reference:> Could you entertain me? Why are you so adamant about SK being here or not? I mean, you could be the SK yourself, and I'm pretty ok with that (given my shoddy shooting? Bluh.) given that the mutual target exists. 1:4:2//5:2 scenario, and going by conventional logic-it is a crucial stage in game right here despite the idea of multi-nightkilling roles.
>
Note. How solid are your reads on people, that you didn't even shoot them? You propose a 'me/scientist' following,
Riiiight here. and lack any reasons to why. Your majesty, I expected much better than that from you. Obtuseness isn't a regal attribute.
> What did you glean from my conversations in D1? You had intrigue on me during then (see: Reference, and
this), and generally wanted to know what I was up to, and what my thoughts were. I like this attitude. However, I can't quite follow from all posts henceforth how it leads to me being your top scumtell.
> Can you detail your reads from D2, and now? Why your suspects are so, and what shifted them?
> Do note, if the above on why you suspect me (Hapah shift?),
I'd like to know what you thought about UI back here. How did it change until now?
Related:
Me and buddy-UI.> ...Somewhat 'humor me' and serious-statement here, but
Can you detail your thoughts on what happened during this post?> Is RL treating you well?
My notes:
I doubt there's a bus driver (scum), leaving a JOAT in place from the 3 listed role formations earlier. Why? Either they are among those who are quiet (SBC, I'm looking at
you), or they'd have claimed bus driver.
Edit: ...OK, this is embarassing. I confused 'commuter' as a town bus driver. >_> I blame flash mafia BM-link reference to that idea of being either town/scum. Leaving the note above for posterity anyway.
..Yeah. I don't know what to think. There may be a JOAT/Bus Driver, and the bus driver is the best case scenario I can see on why the shift occurred, or scientist is lying about the block.
Why I unvoted, in detail:
Remember the 1:4:2//5:2 setup? Still exists on my shoulders. That, and a nice backtrack reveals wonderful info.
Note for posterity, and
this doesn't seem compatible, as in they don't cancel out each other. That was a
valid reason. Something funny on why a Vigilante would claim 'tracker' on someone else. While it could be argued that a ploy was forming, a tiny note whispered that Toony, in the scenario where he may be fakeclaiming Vig for anykinda reason, suggests the roleclaim as an honest possibility (despite that kind of context. Bad context.)
But the only next post stands at
here, revealing something Toony added compared to how he thought of me earlier. Color me intrigued. If you're the SK, Toony, I won't be up for lynching you. Silly-lynching is stoopid and impractical at this point.