Tiruin:Leaning upset town. Possibly faked it to disguise scuminess, but I doubt it.
...
Alright, perhaps people are confusing how I play, and what I do.
In all cases when I'm cornered, regardless of alignment (remember that Paranormal, guys? Remember that?!)
I would put and place the general area and notes I've gleaned-putting forward my honest actions in accordance with my claim--the basis lies in my claim. Next, I would refute possible tangents against my claim and put forward the most-logical principle in my own shoes. Along that, I'd argue at
everyone and push forward the notion of 'what do you think on this idea I have and what's the real case on me?' mostly paraphrased and put in subjective forms according to the event and scenario.
Here? I see nothing but crap tossed at me, people evading my questions, and no
open speculation after counterarguments are presented.
So being upset means 'Why can't people put a logical case against me? If I've been lying, why not shove it up my face,
and prove it with direct evidence?!'
Tiruin: Why did you pick those targets? Killing people without much evidence doesn't seem like something you would do. At least, not as town.
nghhhnh. What else do you want me to say other than what I've said before?! I picked those targets according to how scummy I saw them--ZU less than Hapah, but I chose to kill him to waylay my doubt. ZU mostly screams leaning-scum to me most games depending on his brevity; and
yes the answer to his brevity is dictated in my roleclaim.
AND THERE WAS EVIDENCE. Why can you NOT poke at that evidence? I was also busy-busy D1, to add that unneeded fluff, but that doesn't excuse my play.
What is the comparison to 'if I was town I'd do...'
First and foremost: I am the Vigilante. Did anyone bus last night?
Tiruin, could you please explain what's in orange? Maybe I'm blind, but I never see anything else on this. Why did you ask? You obviously, successfully killed Hapah last night.
Yeah, this was me under the confusion on the commuter = town bus driver thing. >_>