Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 21

Author Topic: GR@W: Building Empires with Giant Robots: TURN 6  (Read 29124 times)

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: GR@W: Building Empires with Giant Robots: TURN 3
« Reply #210 on: December 28, 2013, 09:15:57 pm »

Well, the industral capacity? That I can see staying. The research bonus would be lost due to all the scientists and engineers fleeing the territory.
Full research would be FAR too much of an advantage though. Industry is fine, since that doesn't scale. I'd say around a third to a quarter of the original value would be fair?
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

Azthor

  • Bay Watcher
  • Doomy Dooms of Doom, Discount Sale!
    • View Profile
Re: GR@W: Building Empires with Giant Robots: TURN 3
« Reply #211 on: December 28, 2013, 11:03:42 pm »

Well, the industral capacity? That I can see staying. The research bonus would be lost due to all the scientists and engineers fleeing the territory.
Full research would be FAR too much of an advantage though. Industry is fine, since that doesn't scale. I'd say around a third to a quarter of the original value would be fair?

Do excuse me, Taricus, but it is a bit too convenient that you've only now decided to bring that up now. A strategy game whose parameters are mutable with no prior input as to their mutability is no strategy game at all. How would one plan ahead in chess were it so that the rook could be suddenly declared to have the same movement pattern as a bishop? One wouldn't, it'd  be madness.

Argue over the balance as you may, and I will give my input on that at a later date, the principle to be defended here, first and foremost, is that of consistency. Full research it was declared it'd be, full research is what we all had to plan our moves over, and full research should therefore be what it remains.
Logged

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: GR@W: Building Empires with Giant Robots: TURN 3
« Reply #212 on: December 29, 2013, 12:34:02 am »

Mind you, previously I thought that the entire capital was destroyed wholesale. I only asked to confirm it now just to make sure that was the case, but it wasn't.

As for full research being the motive here, I think you may've slightly gotten the wording wrong, or that you should've really checked your motives beforehand.
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

Azthor

  • Bay Watcher
  • Doomy Dooms of Doom, Discount Sale!
    • View Profile
Re: GR@W: Building Empires with Giant Robots: TURN 3
« Reply #213 on: December 29, 2013, 02:33:17 am »

Mind you, previously I thought that the entire capital was destroyed wholesale. I only asked to confirm it now just to make sure that was the case, but it wasn't.

As for full research being the motive here, I think you may've slightly gotten the wording wrong, or that you should've really checked your motives beforehand.

I can't quite make sense of what you mean there, in the second paragraph. Unless there has been some misunderstanding, and we haven't been speaking about whether or not captured capitals should provide 10 RP, the motivation behind this conversation is clearly whether or not captured capitals should provide full research value.

If there has, indeed, been a misunderstanding, please do tell.
Logged

GreatWyrmGold

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sane, by the local standards.
    • View Profile
Re: GR@W: Building Empires with Giant Robots: TURN 3
« Reply #214 on: December 29, 2013, 12:08:19 pm »

Well, the industral capacity? That I can see staying. The research bonus would be lost due to all the scientists and engineers fleeing the territory.
Full research would be FAR too much of an advantage though. Industry is fine, since that doesn't scale. I'd say around a third to a quarter of the original value would be fair?
Do excuse me, Taricus, but it is a bit too convenient that you've only now decided to bring that up now. A strategy game whose parameters are mutable with no prior input as to their mutability is no strategy game at all. How would one plan ahead in chess were it so that the rook could be suddenly declared to have the same movement pattern as a bishop? One wouldn't, it'd  be madness.
It's a bit more of a specific issue, one too fine to have a real difference in chess. It's more like...this is going to take a bit of explanation.
In Civilization IV, and maybe V (I haven't played it), cities have a Culture...pool, I guess. It accumulates over time, slowly under normal conditions, but faster with the right buildings or whatever. When a city is conquered, this culture pool resets to 0. (I never got that. Was Rome made less of a famed city by being conquered by the barbarians, its greatness only creeping up under its current ownership by the modern Italian nation? What about Teotihuacan and Troy, Washington, DC and Byzantium/Constantinople/Istanbul? But I digress.) You could make the argument that having to rebuild all your culture after losing and reconquering it is unfair to those going for culture victories, or who for whatever reason need wide borders. This situation is like changing how culture loss during conquest works in the middle of a game of Civilization.
...Wow, that was wordy.

Mind you, previously I thought that the entire capital was destroyed wholesale. I only asked to confirm it now just to make sure that was the case, but it wasn't.
As for full research being the motive here, I think you may've slightly gotten the wording wrong, or that you should've really checked your motives beforehand.
I can't quite make sense of what you mean there, in the second paragraph. Unless there has been some misunderstanding, and we haven't been speaking about whether or not captured capitals should provide 10 RP, the motivation behind this conversation is clearly whether or not captured capitals should provide full research value.
If there has, indeed, been a misunderstanding, please do tell.
I think his problem was that you were implying he had an ulterior motive in arguing for lower research output.


Overall...pick something and stick to it. The original implication was that research rates would remain the same when the capital was conquered, but it's not like anyone's plans hinged on doubling their research rates by conquering an enemy--they hinged on conquering enemies because it's that kind of game.
Logged
Sig
Are you a GM with players who haven't posted? TheDelinquent Players Help will have Bay12 give you an action!
[GreatWyrmGold] gets a little crown. May it forever be his mark of Cain; let no one argue pointless subjects with him lest they receive the same.

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: GR@W: Building Empires with Giant Robots: TURN 3
« Reply #215 on: December 31, 2013, 04:07:59 am »

Updated turn. also, Azthor, make your intent public.

zacen299

  • Bay Watcher
  • And again everything goes wrong.
    • View Profile
Re: GR@W: Building Empires with Giant Robots: TURN 3
« Reply #216 on: December 31, 2013, 05:27:06 am »

Updated turn. also, Azthor, make your intent public.

What intent if it's that he's attacking the people near him that's public and there isn't much else he has to tell anyone.
Logged
I (somehow) wield a marble coffin that i fill with the corpses of all I have slain (to make an already heavy object even heavier) in one hand, and the other holds a book made out out of fucking platinum. The book can crush skulls, and the coffin grows ever stronger and now that is has a few dead dragons in it, it sends people flying a mile backwards to explode in a pile of gore. Gore which I then place into the coffin,

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: GR@W: Building Empires with Giant Robots: TURN 3
« Reply #217 on: December 31, 2013, 05:50:21 am »

Also Evilcherry, the unit does need stats. Might want to put that in your turn as well unless you PMed that to USEC.
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: GR@W: Building Empires with Giant Robots: TURN 3
« Reply #218 on: January 02, 2014, 08:48:08 am »

Updated.

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: GR@W: Building Empires with Giant Robots: TURN 3
« Reply #219 on: January 02, 2014, 11:45:02 am »

May we have an update please USEC?
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

USEC_OFFICER

  • Bay Watcher
  • Pulls the strings and makes them ring.
    • View Profile
Re: GR@W: Building Empires with Giant Robots: TURN 3
« Reply #220 on: January 02, 2014, 11:50:42 am »

May we have an update please USEC?

Of course! I'm just overhauling my combat program as I'm typing this, since it was a piece of crap. It's working much better already (though I'm kinda rushing through the last bits here) and should be easy to overhaul for when GR@W 2 rolls about. Just give me a couple hours and the update should be out.
Logged

USEC_OFFICER

  • Bay Watcher
  • Pulls the strings and makes them ring.
    • View Profile
GR@W: Building Empires with Giant Robots: TURN 4
« Reply #221 on: January 02, 2014, 05:35:09 pm »

Turn 4


Spoiler: Sol Broadcast Network (click to show/hide)

Spoiler: Infrastructure (click to show/hide)
Spoiler: Provinces (click to show/hide)
Spoiler: Province Names (click to show/hide)

Spoiler: Republic of Progress (click to show/hide)


Spoiler: EDL (click to show/hide)

Spoiler: Katauvan Dominate (click to show/hide)



Spoiler: Kingdom of Blackwolf (click to show/hide)

Spoiler: Terran Empire (click to show/hide)

Evilcherry, deploying Units mean moving them from your Unit Pool to a province you control. Moving already deployed Units (like the ones in your capital) costs no Admin Points. Also your current level of Warfare Technology is only 1, so your VVM-01 Garland has 2 more points than it should. Can you please fix that before the start of the next turn? (Also I should really review orders a lot more frequently to catch silly stuff like this).

Also working on the program has helped me figure out how horrible the combat in this game is. GR@W 2 should be marginally better in the fighting department. Marginally.

As per usual, let me know if I messed stuff up big-time. I'm pretty sure that I did.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2014, 10:13:38 pm by USEC_OFFICER »
Logged

zacen299

  • Bay Watcher
  • And again everything goes wrong.
    • View Profile
Re: GR@W: Building Empires with Giant Robots: TURN 4
« Reply #222 on: January 02, 2014, 06:17:44 pm »

Ap Usage
Gain Control of Ma6
Create Factory in Ma4 and in Ma2


Research Usage
All Fifteen research into Industry

Production
Create as many Type 14 Wolfguards as I can (again)

Movement
None

Also Usec you forgot to remove the unused ace slot comment in my info. Is it just me or should labs be boosted in GR@W 2? Even like a 1 increase would help make them far more useful. They need a full AP to make and they only add 1 research I could be wrong but that's my opinion.
« Last Edit: January 02, 2014, 08:13:50 pm by zacen299 »
Logged
I (somehow) wield a marble coffin that i fill with the corpses of all I have slain (to make an already heavy object even heavier) in one hand, and the other holds a book made out out of fucking platinum. The book can crush skulls, and the coffin grows ever stronger and now that is has a few dead dragons in it, it sends people flying a mile backwards to explode in a pile of gore. Gore which I then place into the coffin,

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: GR@W: Building Empires with Giant Robots: TURN 2
« Reply #223 on: January 02, 2014, 06:50:39 pm »

Spoiler: Dominate Orders (click to show/hide)

Spoiler: "Python" Interceptor (click to show/hide)

Spoiler: Ace Update (click to show/hide)

Spoiler: New Ace (click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: January 03, 2014, 05:28:25 pm by Taricus »
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: GR@W: Building Empires with Giant Robots: TURN 4
« Reply #224 on: January 03, 2014, 04:41:38 am »

Shit. Should have moved the boat further then (or could you let me retcon that?).

Remove the Defense and Accuracy part from the Garland.

Move Group 1 to Mercury Orbit, or Me2 if possible and needed to colonize Me2.

Colonize Me2 (if possible) V6 (if not)
Colonize V5

All extra production to Garlands.

Research next level of Admin, then pour all else to industry.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2014, 04:54:57 am by evilcherry »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 21