Nerjin, in most of your posts, you're making a reasonable appraisal of each player's style and actions. They are nice summaries, and you include a tidbit or two of personal advice, some praise or scolding, and very rarely a non-rhetorical/non 'where are you' question for someone.
Ironically, this is pretty useful for a game of beginners, but it was while I read it here in the first beginner's game I've seen it in, that I realized you're not just doing this because it's a beginner game. This is -you-, your new playstyle as of the recent BYOR. So I tried to read into it, to taste your intention and goals - and it feels to me like you are only trying to honestly evaluate play. Not leaning towards catching Scum, not leaning towards expressing yourself, everything I feel from your words and intention as I read your posts is the honest desire to present an accurate assessment of how others are playing.
What I really do not feel is anything other than an attempt to evaluate and give feedback. This is giving me an astonishingly null read of you! While it's neat to have a referee calling out the plays, commentating, and in a sense awarding points; a summary of what you think of everyone is quite important to share but that's more often done at a day's end, after direct and often personal interaction, not primarily observation and reaction without that direct interaction.
Is this style something you're still experimenting with and figuring out how to use? Would you recommend it to others? How much of it feels like Scumhunting to you, and how much reporting observations and providing feedback? Or is reporting and feedback a major part of Scumhunting? Can you suggest how your style could be read to interpret it for intent and alignment? It really looks like a wall to me this game.
Cat:
Also, did you have to Persus? Why couldn't you let him poke at it!
Because I felt like poking at it. I like people to actually scumhunt besides just listing who they suspect.
Which him and what it are you referring to here?
Persus13 thought you meant his question to you, about your reasons for your unexplained suspicions, and you don't appear to have followed up with either Persus or Sinlessmoon after this point, though your next post:
We have 2 MLes in case you guys didn't realize, Lets just vote and go with it.
Also, Persus, that post makes you seem to drawing attention away from active people...
You.
You previously said:
I'm voting Jembot to get him to come back
and
Sin is here, but he's not participating. And right now, with the activity, it is perfect for that kind of lurker play.
Also, did you have to Persus? Why couldn't you let him poke at it!
If those are both about Sin, then you're pretty much paying attention to less actives too.
Before that, you... is this a joke?
Obviously, both the ICs are scum!
BURN THEM!
but despite challenging Nerjin the post before:
Nerjin: So you say you read through our posts? Did you actually read through our posts? Since I voted him for that. Yes. But if you didn't see, I stayed on him for multiple reasons, that kept compounding as the game went on.
You tell Nerjin he's wrong and challenge him for not reading (or understanding you).
Now, Nerjin doesn't react to this, at least he hasn't yet, though he has posted since - his next two posts explain weekend time and visits WIFOM and alternate theories. This is interesting, he broke his defensive style, but he didn't do it to Scumhunt, he did it primarily to teach small quick lessons (with a mention about where his time is going, quite legitimate that he doesn't have weekend time for the game right now)
But Nerjin doesn't touch Superblackcat's challenge, at least yet. And Cat doesn't revisit this either, at least yet.
Why not, Cat?
And Cat, what's wrong with Persus13 presenting a case against the lurkers? How does that case draw attention away from the actives, there's not enough attention to go around and consider everyone? How was Persus's presentation of his thoughts worse than your more veiled statements of suspicion and use of vote that came before it, worse than mastahcheese's consideration of the lurkers, and that of MOWE who posted after your question? Why'd you not follow up on your challenge to Persus, or challenge the others on the same issue?
MOWE, Persus13, and mastahcheeseI think all of the active players are town.
Alright, I think we've ruled out active people by now, or at least I have.
To me, the lack of another case means that one of the four lurkers was Makeinu's scumbuddy.
How certain are each of you that the most active players are ruled out as Scum? I completely agree with voting, and focusing, on the most scummy player(s), but in what you say, all three of you sound like you are done with everyone except a narrow pool of suspects, all of whom have been less responsive or completely silent throughout most of the game.
I do understand ruling people out - I don't have very much to say to those I view as highly likely to be Town, those whose play and logic makes great sense to me and who is reacting very reasonably. I watch that person and I'm done, as long as their behavior keeps making sense to me. That's me - and I haven't seen specifically Persus, the only one of you three I actually have played with before, do this before. In fact, I haven't seen anyone else but myself do this before. But all three of you appear very comfortable with it this time, so I'd like each of you to explain why you feel comfortable that you're done with each other.
4maskwolfAnother thing to take note of is the fact that with one mafioso dead, the other one will be incapable of bussing anyone else. Without a more thorough analysis, I don't know what to make of this, perhaps you all could figure something out.
It's fine that you haven't thoroughly analyzed this, but please explain what general significance you think that the remaining Scum being unable to bus anyone else has?
Imp
My lack of a greeting was due to the fact that my hard drive got fried on my computer, so I was posting from my iPod touch. I've been posting the longer updates from school computers, but I should get my computer back today or tomorrow and be able to take a more active role.
What about you? You seemed QUITE eager to post as much as possible, despite obstacles.
Lack of a greeting....
Just remember, I will be watching all of you.
Then what's that, if not a greeting? Telling us you're here, implying that you intend to play - but not actually doing anything other than saying hi in a creative way. That's what I challenged you about...
I'm bothered by 4maskwolf's opening comment. Glad he said some form of 'I am here', but that's essentially all he said.
Good to know why you only 'touched base' as it were. But if that wasn't a greeting to you - what was it?
As for myself, I am indeed QUITE eager to play. Life's getting in the way, but I'm still very new to Mafia; my first game of any sort of Mafia was BM43, the one that preceded this one (not the Sprint). I've only played 4 games before this one. Play requires posting; day 2 is getting late. This is my first chance to be a replacement that actually replaced in, and I'm replacing someone who was almost silent in a game with around a 40-50% low activity rate. And I am, life permitting, highly active.
Heck, my first game people were naming my posts (because of their length, not quality, alas. Maybe the other, someday) and even timing the game as before and after certain of my posts. I'm not -trying- for that, mind you. But 'eager' is a great description of me, yes.
However I couldn't care less about how frequently or rarely I post - so long as I get to play with the greatest depth and intensity possible, and the frequency is enough to get the job done - there's Scum to catch, and I don't expect one to catch itself. I very much want to be part of the process - I'm here to play and play the very, very best I can, and I'm quite annoyed that life's demands are interfering with my playtime here!
Sinlessmoon Exams already? Ouch. For me the semester barely has started. How much time do you believe you'll have for this game; do you intend to replace or will you be able to interact with us fairly frequently?