What the shit.
This guy is arguing that the sun is actually electrically powered, using green comic sans.
I mean, what?
Does this look like how you want to perform scientific discussion?
Consider the article.
Quickly scanning through, it appears to me that what we have here is someone who has learnt some basic physics and believes that they now know 'everything', and now can't believe any extra refinements to physics that is available for them to learn. Such as "nuclear fusion gives out energy, so nuclear fission should always
use up energy, obviously!!!" (to paraphrase). They've made up a 'consistent' personal theory in lieu of this and will doubtless stick religiously to that theory, especially since all geniuses were once told they were wrong, so being told that they are wrong is conclusive evidence that they are, in fact, a genius...
Also we have someone who believes that repeating images (sometimes two or three consecutive times, separated only by an intervening paragraph!), is a valid way of making a point with the images that the images didn't even make the first time.
(And the element is "silicon", not "silicone", but that's the least of the author's worries.)