Washington, DC is much farther south. The state of Washington is on the opposite coast.
I solemnly swear that I didn't look at any other maps or reference materials when doing these. I've just always been a geography buff.
Here in America, we call them North and South Carolina. (And we don't hyphenate Mississippi.))
1. Greenland's fjords, aka the only parts the Norse ever went to, are actually very much green. And Iceland does have a good amount of ice.
2. You marked the California region as "Future South Canada". I don't think they'd take it.
Easy peasy, since I've been there and traveled through all of it but WA and Tasmania.
Also, its territories are small enough in number and geographic enough in name that someone unaware of Australia's existence could get half of them right. Most people are going to know about Tasmania, so that only leaves a few more to mess up.
So there's been an image of a map of the US with states labelled by an Australian with very limited geographical knowledge doing the rounds on the 'Net recently...
I'd like to see that. Do you have a link or something?
That's horrible. There are like five states labeled Virginia and not one of them is actually Virginia or West Virginia.
Also, they weren't
drunk, they were
following rivers. I suppose the Aussie didn't see many of those, but they're important in the Midwest. Especially a couple centuries ago.
...And "Oz"?
The irony here is that I know the US less than Europe.
Good. Although you left out the major industries and such of a lot of states. On a more serious note, Puerto Rico is part of the US (a commonwealth if I recall), and if 50 wasn't such a nice round number it would probably be a state. Maybe when we get nine more, Puerto Rico.
If I got something wrong here then... I will do something.
EDIT: Forgot Andorra. God darn it. I nearly forgot Monaco too.
Iceland also has volcanoes.