I agree. It is rather unlikely she is cheating. But how, then, can she do all of this so quickly?
As far as the dummy thing goes, I didn't imply it was an obvious fake from close up because you spent so much time talking to it, so I would have have to nullify most of your post by saying, "By the way, this is definitely not a pony." But you seems so eagre to squeeze the life out of her that I couldn't stand to break your heart!
Even so, the dummy, in reality, would have dissipated so quickly that you wouldn't have noticed anything specifically odd about it. Well, besides the fact that it was destroyed on contact, and that it wasn't living.
Also, I said that your action was more physical than I anticipated, and it was. Physically grabbing onto your enemy in a magic duel is very physical. But that is irrelevant, because you did experience at least some kind of force resist you as you were choking her.
And finally, no, I haven't read that fic.
The most important thing I'm taking away from this, though, is your questioning of the validity of my posts (which is fine as long as it doesn't bog down the game) and your apparent inability to go along with the game. Both these combined demonstrate a problem we must fix. I don't want to have to explain out of character knowledge to you every time you find something illogical. Normally, this wouldn't be a problem, but your previous two actions (attempting to teleport out of a duel and calmly walking up to Clover in the middle of the duel) show me that you are actively defying the game, likely because you have some issues with how I'm running it or, more specifically, the logic of my characters.
Firstly, let me explain my logic.
Your character attempted to teleport out of the arena of a duel. Now, I think it's pretty logical to assume that once you're in a duel, you should stick to it. I didn't think I'd have to explain that to you. Saying 'It wasn't mentioned in the rules' is akin to agreeing to a shootout at sundown, then sniping your opponent safely from the clock tower. After all, the agreement was a shootout, they never said it was supposed to be revolvers.
So, as far as that point goes, you are technically (very technically) justified in thinking teleporting outside the arena is allowed, because the rules weren't fully explained in excruciating detail to your character. But I was hoping your character, who has knowledge of noble customs, would see this as dishonourable, or at least rogueish or underhanded. You are, after all, exploiting perceived loopholes.
Next, your character, in defiance of logic, walks up to Clover and expresses your personal (OOC) concerns. She says 'Wards are suddenly in place.' I assume this means you believe I pulled them out of my ass. Well, while I didn't think they were necessary at the time, but your actions showed I had to find a way to enforce the rules. And so, wards. But I think it is reasonable to assume they would be there in the first place. Next, you say the rules were changed mid-battle. They weren't. But I'll get to that in my conclusion. Finally, you say that weapons are dropped at you feet in defiance of the rules. Well, I can counter this bit in the conclusion.
The rules were always set. The wards thing enforces a rule I thought went without saying. The no weapons rule was meant to give you pause. After all, you've already explained that weapons are key to your craft. I expected you to defy those terms, at which point I would have explained the counterbalance rule, which is pretty much an intended loophole in the rules. And you might say that I just made up that rule, but if you'll look at my previous post, you'll note that Instructor Days had always been levitating those bags, which are full of countermeasure to balance the battle.
But none of this would be a problem, not even if I had fucked up majorly, if you'd simply go with the flow. I'm not perfect, but I think I know what I'm doing. So, if you'll keep all objections to NPC logic and plot consistency OOC (where I can address them without altering the game), and not alter your characters action in defiance of perceived unfairness, we can continue without issue.