Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 79 80 [81] 82 83

Author Topic: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People  (Read 69437 times)

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1200 on: October 25, 2013, 07:01:53 am »

And it doesn't have the hybrid engine, you realise?
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

LordSlowpoke

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1201 on: October 25, 2013, 07:26:20 am »

On the 5000t supergun:

I guess slowpoke need to figure out whether what kind of gun he would want. A long gun would be good enough to hit a capital ship but its lack of maneuverability would hurt itself. A mortar guarantees a large charge, and if perfectly designed there it could be bigger than anything ever built, but whether it can go inside the range of coastal guns is another question. A howitzer is something in between.

i meant a gun with a range huge enough that you could fire at things from out of range of the coastal guns, therefore a long gun

who knows these things
Logged

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1202 on: October 25, 2013, 08:34:09 am »

And it doesn't have the hybrid engine, you realise?
And thus there is no need to redesign from ground up. Just remove that and it will be good enough to go.

(speaking of this, when are large ships 100% designed before they are launched?)

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1203 on: October 25, 2013, 08:43:24 am »

You do realise that the annihilator was a modification of the original great white design, right?
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1204 on: October 25, 2013, 08:56:08 am »

You do realise that the annihilator was a modification of the original great white design, right?
and thus it does not really need a large slot.

Fitting more boilers into the hull instead of diesel propulsion is not a good use of large slots IMHO.

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1205 on: October 25, 2013, 08:57:11 am »

I also put it under a med/small slot as well Evil :P

EDIT: It's a turbine, not a boiler.
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

LordSlowpoke

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1206 on: October 25, 2013, 08:57:58 am »

You do realise that the annihilator was a modification of the original great white design, right?
and thus it does not really need a large slot.

Fitting more boilers into the hull instead of diesel propulsion is not a good use of large slots IMHO.

mucking about with steam or diesel propulsion instead of focusing on engines that can use our liquified coalTM is silly
Logged

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1207 on: October 25, 2013, 08:59:13 am »

I also put it under a med/small slot as well Evil :P

EDIT: It's a turbine, not a boiler.
Well you need both turbines and boilers to make steam ship. In addition I'm not a big fan of designating variants with different names.

You do realise that the annihilator was a modification of the original great white design, right?
and thus it does not really need a large slot.

Fitting more boilers into the hull instead of diesel propulsion is not a good use of large slots IMHO.

mucking about with steam or diesel propulsion instead of focusing on engines that can use our liquified coalTM is silly

We have tons of coal, and steam is actually more efficient for a continuous load (mainly because of more efficient expansion). And that does not mean the boilers cannot work on oil.
« Last Edit: October 25, 2013, 09:01:35 am by evilcherry »
Logged

3_14159

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1208 on: October 25, 2013, 09:00:39 am »

i meant a gun with a range huge enough that you could fire at things from out of range of the coastal guns, therefore a long gun

who knows these things
This is just whatever knowledge I have gathered, basically the range is dependant on the projectile's force when leaving the gun. And the projectile's area seen from the front + how well it is formed, as those two influence the air resistance.
Now, to get a projectile to be quick, you can do two things: Increase the percentage of gunpowder compared to the projectile (more energy by explosion acting on a smaller mass --> more speed), or increase the length of the barrel (because a certain percentage of the energy escapes). The latter seems to be about proportional to 1-SQRT(ratio bullet length to barrel length), meaning that, for example, the difference between a L/4 and a L/50 barrel seem to be about 30%. And yes, that is a very rough estimate, and does not include things like accuracy.
So, basically, the difference between a 'mortar' and a 'normal' artillery piece is that the former uses the fact that he has a very short barrel length to achieve a much higher calibre. Since a higher calibre means more explosives to fit in a high explosive shell, that also means more damage.

I also put it under a med/small slot as well Evil :P

EDIT: It's a turbine, not a boiler.
Well you need both turbines and boilers to make steam ship. In addition I'm not a big fan of designating variants with different names.
Call it the Annihilator B?
Logged

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1209 on: October 25, 2013, 09:01:04 am »

Eh, maybe. But remember Alpha's limit is only for LARGE projects, not medium or small ones, so any actual ships will get through.
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1210 on: October 25, 2013, 09:09:50 am »

I now tend to guess that slowpoke needed something more akin to the German railway guns. Bear in mind that these monstrosities need a very, very stable base to fire, they are damn expensive, and their rate of fire is atrocious.

p.s. their recoil force is in the order of around 50-100 MN. meaning ~50000-100000 Metric Ton-force.
« Last Edit: October 25, 2013, 09:14:55 am by evilcherry »
Logged

LordSlowpoke

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1211 on: October 25, 2013, 09:27:31 am »

I now tend to guess that slowpoke needed something more akin to the German railway guns. Bear in mind that these monstrosities need a very, very stable base to fire, they are damn expensive, and their rate of fire is atrocious.

p.s. their recoil force is in the order of around 50-100 MN. meaning ~50000-100000 Metric Ton-force.

assuming freshwater, that'd only be 20m/s2 direct acceleration

you should be aware that this negotation is pointless as i'm not passing up making this game sillier with superweapons - consider the albatross~
Logged

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1212 on: October 25, 2013, 09:30:13 am »

If you're going to make superweapons, atleast do the sort involving fission. Atleast we get something useful out of it :P
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1213 on: October 25, 2013, 09:33:44 am »

I now tend to guess that slowpoke needed something more akin to the German railway guns. Bear in mind that these monstrosities need a very, very stable base to fire, they are damn expensive, and their rate of fire is atrocious.

p.s. their recoil force is in the order of around 50-100 MN. meaning ~50000-100000 Metric Ton-force.

assuming freshwater, that'd only be 20m/s2 direct acceleration

you should be aware that this negotation is pointless as i'm not passing up making this game sillier with superweapons - consider the albatross~
Which is not that good, actually.

On a side note, the long gun could possibly work using a multiple chamber cannon, which significantly reduces the immediate stress. Something like the V3, I suppose. It would be interesting though.
« Last Edit: October 25, 2013, 09:35:39 am by 10ebbor10 »
Logged

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1214 on: October 25, 2013, 11:28:17 am »

Guys, we do need to vote for the specialists, otherwise that academy of ours is going to waste...
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll
Pages: 1 ... 79 80 [81] 82 83