Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 76 77 [78] 79 80 ... 83

Author Topic: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People  (Read 69471 times)

Dorsidwarf

  • Bay Watcher
  • [INTERSTELLAR]
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1155 on: October 21, 2013, 02:55:36 pm »

a pentagon shaped aircraft carrier...

Are you talking from above or from the side or what?
From the fourth dimension when viewed through a 6-dimensional sieve.

duh.
Logged
Quote from: Rodney Ootkins
Everything is going to be alright

Aseaheru

  • Bay Watcher
  • Cursed by the Elves with a title.
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1156 on: October 21, 2013, 02:59:10 pm »

How do you look at things from time...
Whats the sixth? I know that the fifth is probability, but have never heard of the sixth.
Logged
Highly Opinionated Fool
Warning, nearly incapable of expressing tone in text

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1157 on: October 21, 2013, 02:59:33 pm »

I suspect that you didn't update shipcount  of our Navy
D'oh
Logged

Funk

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1158 on: October 21, 2013, 03:47:21 pm »

a pentagon shaped aircraft carrier...

Are you talking from above or from the side or what?
Cross section view, so the top is flat but the sides are sloped for added armour, it would need a control tower but that should be mounted to one side.

Im wondering about useing the engines of the odd raven in a new plane, it would have four of them in a push-pull configuration.
Im just not sure what it should do? ground attack? light cargo/ paratroopers?
Logged
Agree, plus that's about the LAST thing *I* want to see from this kind of game - author spending valuable development time on useless graphics.

Unofficial slogan of Bay 12 Games.  

Death to the false emperor a warhammer40k SG

Aseaheru

  • Bay Watcher
  • Cursed by the Elves with a title.
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1159 on: October 21, 2013, 03:54:12 pm »

Well, we could have an aircraft with four engines that can pull gliders...
Logged
Highly Opinionated Fool
Warning, nearly incapable of expressing tone in text

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1160 on: October 21, 2013, 05:11:15 pm »

Or we could use the albatrosses.
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

Funk

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1161 on: October 21, 2013, 05:29:34 pm »

Albatrosses are our main high level bomber, we are likely to need them to do other things.
Still will 800kw be able to pull a good size glider? (8+).
Logged
Agree, plus that's about the LAST thing *I* want to see from this kind of game - author spending valuable development time on useless graphics.

Unofficial slogan of Bay 12 Games.  

Death to the false emperor a warhammer40k SG

Ukrainian Ranger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1162 on: October 21, 2013, 05:30:50 pm »

No, that engine is old, heavy and bad
Logged
War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1163 on: October 21, 2013, 09:07:26 pm »

We value our comrades. We should actually make sure the world knows of the inhumane acts of the enemy in putting their soldiers into near-suicidal missions.

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1164 on: October 22, 2013, 12:24:17 am »

Evilcherry, we don't have a proposal four yet. You may want to change the numbering on yours to rectify this :P
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1165 on: October 22, 2013, 03:24:39 am »

Evilcherry, we don't have a proposal four yet. You may want to change the numbering on yours to rectify this :P
Actually, there is. It's not bolded, however.
Logged

Aseaheru

  • Bay Watcher
  • Cursed by the Elves with a title.
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1166 on: October 22, 2013, 02:51:46 pm »

Did I forget to do something? If so I will soon be attempting to fix it.
Logged
Highly Opinionated Fool
Warning, nearly incapable of expressing tone in text

ICBM pilot

  • Bay Watcher
  • D'awwww
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1167 on: October 22, 2013, 09:30:14 pm »

How well armed and armored are enemy merchants?
Logged
On the plus side, they managed to kill off 20+ children

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1168 on: October 22, 2013, 10:13:06 pm »


"Main weapons would be bombs or depth charges carried underwing or in the belly"

I guess this invalidates 5.1 here.

3_14159

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1169 on: October 23, 2013, 09:52:18 am »

Some things....

1. We actually can retire the Mosin-Nagant right now: We have enough Revolutionary rifles and SMGs to outfit everybody.
1.1: Question: Why did the infantry armament complex produce no SMGs?

2. We require preparation for an invasion. For that, we definitely need:
- Landing ships
- Tanks
It would be nice to have:
- A new (improved) fighter
- more machine guns
- Naval superiority (new ship?)
- personnel carrier, possibly armoured.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 76 77 [78] 79 80 ... 83