Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 59 60 [61] 62 63 ... 83

Author Topic: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People  (Read 69617 times)

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #900 on: October 13, 2013, 03:28:56 am »

I got a minor gut feeling that the Albatross should be renamed the Condor to reflect its terrestrial use.

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #901 on: October 13, 2013, 03:32:00 am »

Most of the time it's going to fly back and forth over the sea, I believe.
Logged

3_14159

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #902 on: October 13, 2013, 03:48:37 am »

Quite surprised that new engine for fighters is not popular enough
Actually, I think it is. We have two votes for 14 and one for 14.1 as a modification. That means the total number of votes is three, with the most popular being 14.
At least, if I've understood the rules correctly.
Logged

Ukrainian Ranger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #903 on: October 13, 2013, 04:31:44 am »

Nah, subs don't help main proposal, remember when  we got no fighter because one half of players voted for twin-engines, another for single engined



Logged
War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #904 on: October 13, 2013, 04:40:22 am »

Subs help a proposal only when they're not exclusive.

In the case of 14 and 14.1, they're not exclusive. (Though it's a bit iffy, and don't blame me if I change my mind on the matter.)
Logged

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #905 on: October 13, 2013, 05:10:26 am »

Double post, but I intend to run the next turn today.

It will be interesting.
« Last Edit: October 13, 2013, 05:37:39 am by 10ebbor10 »
Logged

kahn1234

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #906 on: October 13, 2013, 06:40:33 am »

Kahn, We ALREADY have a SAW. As I said, we just aren't producing it yet.

well point it out to me because it is not in the weapons list in the second post.

Patrick Hunt

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #907 on: October 13, 2013, 03:11:42 pm »

Hey Ebbor, we lost a lot of planes considering the enemy lost 0 unless you just ain't done there aircraft losses yet?
Logged
Caine's law.
And so, here at the end of days, you are as you’ve always been. Willing to die. Not willing to quit.

Vengeance is mine saith the Lord but this morning. He's going to fucking well have to share.

Is she worth it, would you burn the city to save her? For her, I'd burn the world.

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #908 on: October 13, 2013, 03:14:53 pm »

I have a feeling we probably want to up the ante with our ground development. Though we do have another team at our disposal now, which is good. Where do you guys think we should assign the newly gained specialists though?
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #909 on: October 13, 2013, 03:18:52 pm »

Hey Ebbor, we lost a lot of planes considering the enemy lost 0 unless you just ain't done there aircraft losses yet?
The military losses are far from finished.
Logged

Ukrainian Ranger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #910 on: October 13, 2013, 03:27:48 pm »

Ouch, should have voted for one of the 10,000t ships, as Punishers are too small for the new dock... On other hand Punishers look promising

Bomber looks very good, hell it's almost as fast as modified sparrows! I suspect that turreted version is slightly slower, but still doubt that we'll need another bomber anytime soon

I suspect that this time their landings are successful and we'll have a hard land battle

If we indeed entered a new landwar than third large team may be needed again
Logged
War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #911 on: October 13, 2013, 03:29:21 pm »

Well, we do have another small team to merge, so that eases that pain. If we can get another this turn, we'll have enough teams to continually update all branches of our military while still having enough smaller teams for new weapons and the like.

EDIT: Also looks like those buggers got a few carriers, but at the current tonnage, they will have a very small aircraft compliment, along with being quite under armoured.
« Last Edit: October 13, 2013, 03:31:34 pm by Taricus »
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

LordSlowpoke

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #912 on: October 13, 2013, 03:31:17 pm »

guys

guys

carpet bomb the mysterious construction

i mean why are you not doing it yet
Logged

Patrick Hunt

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #913 on: October 13, 2013, 03:34:50 pm »

Can I borrow a small team next turn and get those land mines produced? Seriously if we're fighting a defensive war on land we need mines.
Logged
Caine's law.
And so, here at the end of days, you are as you’ve always been. Willing to die. Not willing to quit.

Vengeance is mine saith the Lord but this morning. He's going to fucking well have to share.

Is she worth it, would you burn the city to save her? For her, I'd burn the world.

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #914 on: October 13, 2013, 03:35:17 pm »

If one of you manages to guess what happened (accurately) before I finish the turn, you get an internet cookie.

And a special Ministery of Paranormal Intelligence overriding vote.((Which summons a Ministery of Paranormal Intelligence team to finish one of your proposals with psychic magic and bureaucracy))
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 59 60 [61] 62 63 ... 83