Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 83

Author Topic: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People  (Read 69708 times)

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #435 on: October 01, 2013, 02:32:34 pm »
Making such a modification in the field is unlikely. I mean, you're increase the thing's weight by more than 25%.
Logged

Aseaheru

  • Bay Watcher
  • Cursed by the Elves with a title.
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #436 on: October 01, 2013, 02:34:36 pm »
Evil, at the verry least we can use the frecking things to sell or to train pilots.
Logged
Highly Opinionated Fool
Warning, nearly incapable of expressing tone in text

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #437 on: October 01, 2013, 02:36:23 pm »
Quote from: 10ebbor10 on October 01, 2013, 02:32:34 pm
Making such a modification in the field is unlikely. I mean, you're increase the thing's weight by more than 25%.
Yeah, its heavier, but then just tell us it won't fit with the 500kg-class Torpedo.

For me I'd consider reducing the load, or even change to conventional ordance, in order to make the Ravens useful after our next Fighter.

Oh and that also means we should consider bombing capability for our brand new fighter now.
Logged

Ukrainian Ranger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #438 on: October 01, 2013, 02:41:20 pm »
Raven(T) is a great cost effective torpedo bomber, can't see how it is useless. I think we should produce a lot of them, it's a better solution than Osprey for anti ship duty

Oh, and we'll get 15mm machine-gun even lighter than 30kg I'll be like - BULLSHIT

Just look at the weight of modern high caliber MGs
Logged
War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.

Patrick Hunt

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #439 on: October 01, 2013, 02:42:13 pm »
The Osprey though is needed for hitting the dockyard itself and inland facilities.

Hence why I've suggested a 2400 point facility devoted to the 2. Plus if they attempt to land again we can slaughter them on the beaches with dive bombers.
Logged
Caine's law.
And so, here at the end of days, you are as you’ve always been. Willing to die. Not willing to quit.

Vengeance is mine saith the Lord but this morning. He's going to fucking well have to share.

Is she worth it, would you burn the city to save her? For her, I'd burn the world.

Urist Mc Dwarf

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #440 on: October 01, 2013, 02:59:43 pm »
I think the Raven T should only be used against commerce raiders. Osprey can do everything else.
Also, how big should a grenade be? We need one.
Logged

Patrick Hunt

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #441 on: October 01, 2013, 03:00:31 pm »
Raven T is better for hitting all enemy ships then a dive bomber.
Logged
Caine's law.
And so, here at the end of days, you are as you’ve always been. Willing to die. Not willing to quit.

Vengeance is mine saith the Lord but this morning. He's going to fucking well have to share.

Is she worth it, would you burn the city to save her? For her, I'd burn the world.

Patrick Hunt

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #442 on: October 01, 2013, 03:04:16 pm »
Uhm UR, why did you just propose Osprey and Raven T when I did that an hour ago?
Logged
Caine's law.
And so, here at the end of days, you are as you’ve always been. Willing to die. Not willing to quit.

Vengeance is mine saith the Lord but this morning. He's going to fucking well have to share.

Is she worth it, would you burn the city to save her? For her, I'd burn the world.

Aseaheru

  • Bay Watcher
  • Cursed by the Elves with a title.
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #443 on: October 01, 2013, 03:06:23 pm »
Was it listed in the spoilers? He may have just been attempting to be nice to you.
Logged
Highly Opinionated Fool
Warning, nearly incapable of expressing tone in text

Patrick Hunt

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #444 on: October 01, 2013, 03:09:12 pm »
It is, but it just got listed as an aircraft complex, it should be a complex for Osprey and Raven T.

It's A.
Logged
Caine's law.
And so, here at the end of days, you are as you’ve always been. Willing to die. Not willing to quit.

Vengeance is mine saith the Lord but this morning. He's going to fucking well have to share.

Is she worth it, would you burn the city to save her? For her, I'd burn the world.

Aseaheru

  • Bay Watcher
  • Cursed by the Elves with a title.
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #445 on: October 01, 2013, 03:09:46 pm »
So its make them or make a place to make them?
Logged
Highly Opinionated Fool
Warning, nearly incapable of expressing tone in text

Ukrainian Ranger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #446 on: October 01, 2013, 03:10:55 pm »
Quote from: Patrick Hunt on October 01, 2013, 03:04:16 pm
Uhm UR, why did you just propose Osprey and Raven T when I did that an hour ago?
Because in spoiler it's another 2400 complex. I don't want complex that large and I want ravens produces at Fighter complex, because same engine and simmilar frame so workers are experienced with that
Logged
War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.

Aseaheru

  • Bay Watcher
  • Cursed by the Elves with a title.
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #447 on: October 01, 2013, 03:11:13 pm »
That would do it.
Logged
Highly Opinionated Fool
Warning, nearly incapable of expressing tone in text

Patrick Hunt

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #448 on: October 01, 2013, 03:13:46 pm »
(( So basically you want to produce so few of them that they'll never be capable of actually doing anything? We also need to spread it out to make it harder for enemies to attack as it stands our entire air production is under 1 roof. A single bombing run by our enemy can wipe out our entire air force production which is why I want a new facility. 2 places makes it twice as hard to attack.

Besides which production is not influenced in any way on experience. The facility is built and then produces, thats all. We need a high rate of production to get a large enough force to begin offensive operations.
Logged
Caine's law.
And so, here at the end of days, you are as you’ve always been. Willing to die. Not willing to quit.

Vengeance is mine saith the Lord but this morning. He's going to fucking well have to share.

Is she worth it, would you burn the city to save her? For her, I'd burn the world.

Aseaheru

  • Bay Watcher
  • Cursed by the Elves with a title.
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #449 on: October 01, 2013, 03:15:16 pm »
Who says it would be two places and not just two buildings 100ft from each other?
Logged
Highly Opinionated Fool
Warning, nearly incapable of expressing tone in text
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 83
« previous next »