Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 74 75 [76] 77 78 ... 83

Author Topic: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People  (Read 69481 times)

3_14159

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1125 on: October 20, 2013, 02:01:59 am »

I think if you look at there things it will list a carrier. Atleast it did for me.

Crazy Ivan for subs is to turn full circle so that the sonar can pick up everything. It also keeps people from getting too close to your back.
I think the carrier got clarified. That got me at first, too.

On the crazy ivan: Again, I don't think that's applicable. It's mostly for Sub-vs-Sub engagements most of the time submerged, since otherwise, you can just look around via periscope or, in case of warships, hear them over your own engine noise.

Anyway, unless there's any criticism, I'd post my proposal for action in the main thread.
Logged

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1126 on: October 20, 2013, 03:46:57 am »

Think you should do that. I'd like to get on with the show.
Logged

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1127 on: October 20, 2013, 04:52:27 am »

Well, that battle report kinda indicates that we DO need a new tank, considering how effective theirs was. The army is likely to want a tank that can equal it or better atleast.
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

Ukrainian Ranger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1128 on: October 20, 2013, 05:04:01 am »

Damn, What an epic naval battle that almost annihilated both navies.... I must write a story about this...

Wait, did we just achieve total air superiority before new sparrows  entered the production?

As for the battle plan... I'd really prefer to not assault , instead fortify, establish blockade with what remained from our naval forces and take a pause, saving remains of our Ospreys for the more important job, saving our soldiers and supplying, supplying, supplying.

With our temporal aerial supremacy attacks with Ospreys and bomb carrying Sparrows on their drydocks is a must (should the have enough range), to let us win the race for rebuilding navies, And Albatrosses must attack their aircraft production capabilities to let us win air-force rebuilding race
Logged
War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1129 on: October 20, 2013, 05:07:25 am »

A tank, or at least some reliable anti armor weapon.

Damn, What an epic naval battle that almost annihilated both navies.... I must write a story about this...

Wait, did we just achieve total air superiority before new sparrows  entered the production?
Nope. Not all the enemy planes could reach and participate in the battle. Those bombings, while they didn't destroy many craft, were quite effective in preventing them for participating.
Logged

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1130 on: October 20, 2013, 05:08:38 am »

Technically, with our aircraft production, we can easily do so. A little bombing would help, but with the new sparrows we already have an edge in both quality and numbers. Naval production should be our priority target however, our control over the waves is tentative, so every bit to secure dominance over them is a step in the right direction.
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

Patrick Hunt

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1131 on: October 20, 2013, 05:13:03 am »

Meaning we are not turning our fighters into bombers while our enemy has fighters.

But no need to invade we just make them surrender, they watched there navy and air force get destroyed, they won't resist for long.
Logged
Caine's law.
And so, here at the end of days, you are as you’ve always been. Willing to die. Not willing to quit.

Vengeance is mine saith the Lord but this morning. He's going to fucking well have to share.

Is she worth it, would you burn the city to save her? For her, I'd burn the world.

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1132 on: October 20, 2013, 05:20:21 am »

((Yours don't look that much better. Additionally, a major part of your income was violently obliterated.))

But yeah, it all depends on the terms of surrender.

On a side note, there's a minor problem in the votes. In effect, a tie on the Great white/ Annihilator cruiser. (Also, UR voted for both). Try to resolve that before I get there.
Logged

Ukrainian Ranger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1133 on: October 20, 2013, 05:35:47 am »

Edited my last post in the main topic to prefer Annihilator
Logged
War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1134 on: October 20, 2013, 05:41:15 am »

And now I have another tie between the tank and the boat, for that Large project slot. ("Yay bureaucracy")
Logged

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1135 on: October 20, 2013, 05:43:11 am »

That one could've been solved, if someone didn't suggest a useless, blue-sky project (AKA, the helicopter)  ::)
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1136 on: October 20, 2013, 07:13:30 am »

Anyway, hilarious news from behind the scenes. My boat speed calculator freaked out and suggested that the Annihilator should puddle along at a nice 138 km/h.
Logged

3_14159

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1137 on: October 20, 2013, 07:18:34 am »

Anyway, hilarious news from behind the scenes. My boat speed calculator freaked out and suggested that the Annihilator should puddle along at a nice 138 km/h.
Suggestion: Let's mount wings on it.

And now I have another tie between the tank and the boat, for that Large project slot. ("Yay bureaucracy")
I would've seen the Annihilator as the more important project, which it seemingly will be.
Logged

LordSlowpoke

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1138 on: October 20, 2013, 07:27:23 am »

Anyway, hilarious news from behind the scenes. My boat speed calculator freaked out and suggested that the Annihilator should puddle along at a nice 138 km/h.

CANON
Logged

Ukrainian Ranger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: [Discussion] The Glorious Design Bureau of the People
« Reply #1139 on: October 20, 2013, 08:55:28 am »

Oh, I think that steam only annihilator would be better.... My mistake here

Another problem: I never expected that we'll lose so many hunters while making naval construction plans... Now our force is little too cruiser heavy
« Last Edit: October 20, 2013, 09:08:55 am by Ukrainian Ranger »
Logged
War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.
Pages: 1 ... 74 75 [76] 77 78 ... 83