You Scored as Tactician
You're probably a military buff who wants to have the chance to think through complex problems. You want the rules, and your GM's interpretation of them, to match up what happens in the real world or at least be consistant. You want challenging yet logical obstacles to overcome.
Tactician 92%
Storyteller 58%
Method Actor 50%
Butt-Kicker 50%
Power Gamer 50%
Casual Gamer 42%
Specialist 25%
I think the "casual gamer" part refers to specific questions that I interpreted as being more about how easygoing vs. how controlling you are at the table. Are you willing to compromise to keep the game moving? I answered HELL YEAH and I suspect that gave me a bunch of casual points. Similarly, I think the powergamer questions were really just a power gamer vs. casual axis.
Which category does "I want to be rewarded after a good game session" fit into?
How does it differentiate between Storyteller and Method Actor, especially since this is entirely from a player perspective?
WTF Specialist?
Finally, the Tactician description sounds like about 50% of the arguments I remember in D&D. Half of the arguments are "that wouldn't happen in real life because XYZ" and the other half are "we should totally interpret this rule as XYZ." There's always somebody who wants to bring a physics equation into the issue of how far forward the cattle moves after the dragon drops it while flying over. Or how infravision should totally work. Basically the Tactician flavor text doesn't mean Tactician at all. Here's what I'd write for Tactician:
You approach everything thinking about the best way it can be done. You try to think about all the angles, all the contingencies. You like to pick your battles. You like the rules to be clear and consistent. Ask about ambiguities if they're relevant. All of the important work happens early; the battle is won or lost before the first sword is drawn.
Weird quiz.