Zombie Urist:
Would you please prod
Darvi,
Mr.Zero, and
Superblackcat?
Heya
Rolepgeek! I've read your post. I wonder why you didn't answer any of my questions in your post.
At another time, when I have more time(Aka, the weekends), I will be able to chop through your WoT.
Why are you talking about needing more time (aka the weekends) when you didn't ask for an extension, and haven't yet used weekend time yet (at least to post) for this game? Should I interpret this as a current refusal to answer my questions, as a deflection of attention away from yourself, or as something else? Trying to buck that 'assumption' trend you were talking about - and I'd hate to misunderstand either.
AND NOW FOR THE IMPORTANT PART DUR DUR DURRR
Since it's a tie, I need to vote someone, to break it at the least. I'm not actually going to vote Imp, since I'm starting to think she has important things to make clear, and I want to give her a chance to cut stuff down so she isn't fucking with my eyes anymore. >.> So I'll vote Superblackcat, as they(genderwhutidunno) look to have been active-lurking for the last long while, without really contributing. Plus, you know, the whole ground that's already been trodden upon stuff with buddy-stabbing. 
While I agree that Superblackcat's doing some disgusting high level lack of scumhunting (he's not alone there - to me you are approximately equal/maybe slightly worse in terms of lack of visible scumhunting),
would you explain more about what you mean by the trodden-ground buddy-stabbing? Link(s) or post #(s) would be helpful too, but I'd like to understand your reasoning, please. I get the 'gotta tie break' and 'active lurking' portions.
Can you help me understand that your vote's reasoning isn't "picking someone out of a hat" level thought - or that it actually goes to "I've been scumhunting" levels?Here's some of my questions you didn't answer previously, in case you get time somehow to answer any of them. They all come from
here, so if you need further context it's there.
1 Please explain your thinking on why the Persus NK was smart? And explain how that night kill choice might have been chosen to shove suspicion on you?
Rolepgeek asked to replace. When someone asks for that, it usually means they stop posting. You yourself said you voted him because you had nothing else to do with said vote. Now you talk about your previous play, but it is this very same previous play that makes your disregard as to where your vote goes more glaring. Is the vote yours to use as you see fit? Yes. It still does not exempt you from being called out on it.
As an addition, Imp, you never responded to this portion of his post.
2 I see no questions; that is his response to my response. What sort of further response are you looking for?
You clearly wanted something from me. What did/do you want in regards to this?
3 You have called Deathsword your top Town, because "his posts have plenty of good activity and scum-hunting from what [you] can tell". What good activity, what good scumhunting? This is NOT a snarky question, I'm genuinely confused and have read all of his posts in this thread multiple times. What am I missing that you are catching? - because I don't see this at all.
3. I doubt we're going to lose. As long as we can get just one scum, our odds drastically improve, statistically and otherwise. More time to get the next one, info on who tried to help them, etc.
4 What are you basing this belief on? Of the last 42 BM games in the forum - Town won only 7 times. Even when one Scum is lynched, in past games the single surviving Scum still defeated the Town well over 50% of the time. What's got you so sure of a Town victory?
Those are not all the questions I asked you, but they're probably the most important if you're only going to answer a limited number.
Err, to conclude:
The assumption that WoTs are the best way to go about communicating in this game. Be honest Imp. Really be honest. If everyone, if all nine people, were as [let's go with dedicated] as you, how do you think it'd go? WoTs and Counter-WoTs everywhere. Do you really think you'd have the time to read all that? Let alone respond?
Yes to both. I'm aware that I read faster than most, but during the course of this game I've read several other finished Mafia games, in full. I enjoy reading and commonly read hundreds of pages of text (written book pages) a day because I want to read it.
I don't assume WoTs are the way to go. If everyone says what they have to say, makes their points, does their scumhunting, and answers questions with 50 words or 5,000 - what I'm looking for is what's said. Can I understand it, can I follow it, what does it say about the writer's motivations, intentions, and all the rest that I need to know to do my own scumhunting.
No promises about shortening my posts. I'm willing to try, but if I need 5,000 words I'm using them. I will try to use more summaries again. I tried them before, but people still complained, so I stopped (thus shortening my posts by the length of the summary at least).
Author
Topic: Beginner's Mafia XLIII: Robot Mafia - GAME OVER - TOWN WIN! (Read 136857 times)