Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

AngelxAlistair (Toy ship ahoy!)

2 (8.7%)

RichardxCyrielle (Yes, she's a side character. No, that does not make this any less cute.)

0 (0%)

MariaxSelinaxYurixNuriel (HAREM)

5 (21.7%)

RichardxCamille (The only couple who knew each other for longer than two months. Woo~)

1 (4.3%)

AshleyxConnyxNurielxBismuth (OPPOSING HAREM)

1 (4.3%)

LylexEveryone (An Uke and five Semes. Go figure.)

2 (8.7%)

AlistairxCatherine (Minako, eat your heart out.)

0 (0%)

MariaxSelina (The original, accept no substitutes.)

1 (4.3%)

LyleXRichard (Too much yuri, not enough yaoi.)

1 (4.3%)

IzzyxLucas (Because a normal tsundere is not enough.)

1 (4.3%)

WillxStella (*insert witty tagline here*)

2 (8.7%)

MariexEveryone (Marie, duh.)

2 (8.7%)

AshleyXRichard (Screw retcons, I want my OTP now!)

1 (4.3%)

MariaxMattxSelina (The original OT3. And who was Matt again?)

2 (8.7%)

Richard/CyriellexFourth Wall (Who didn't see this coming?)

2 (8.7%)

Total Members Voted: 23

[Empiricist]

Not sure about the extending to air department. That's up to @KJ to define.

[SOLDIER First]

Wait.
If it's a male, can't we just threaten to cut off it's dragonhood?

[Akroma]

clearly dragon are like fish. mommy dragon lays egg, daddy dragon jizzes all over them

this explains why Will is so often in a bad mood too, if you get what I mean

[SOLDIER First]

That still requires a penis.

[Akroma]

nah, merely some sort of opening to spray from

[SOLDIER First]

Over 97% of all known fish are oviparous,[40] that is, the eggs develop outside the mother's body. Examples of oviparous fish include salmon, goldfish, cichlids, tuna, and eels. In the majority of these species, fertilisation takes place outside the mother's body, with the male and female fish shedding their gametes into the surrounding water. However, a few oviparous fish practice internal fertilization, with the male using some sort of intromittent organ to deliver sperm into the genital opening of the female, most notably the oviparous sharks, such as the horn shark, and oviparous rays, such as skates. In these cases, the male is equipped with a pair of modified pelvic fins known as claspers.

[Akroma]

yeah, but not dragons, dragons are the usual, external fertilization kind

[GreatWyrmGold]

why would a dragon of darkness be especially good at dealing with a light-saber? An attack that is based on light should actually be super effective

If they can create darkness, they can destroy light. Because that's what creating darkness does. It's common sense!

Isn't darkness the absence of visible light? As opposed to all electromagnetic radiation?

Why? After all, all light is visible to something.

*or* they cut through the dragons hide like you claimed armor piercing weaponry does. This is a kind of blade that is built to cut open tanks. The only thing that would be even more armor piercing would be either a neutrino beam or an entirely incorporeal ghost-blade-thing

Why are vibrating weapons inherently anti-armor? That's...kinda my point.

also, dragons should be weak to their opposed element

Why? It's just the magic they can use. Was Kyle vulnerable to getting hit with rocks? Was Angel hurt by water? Does fire burn Catherine more?

Wait.
If it's a male, can't we just threaten to cut off it's dragonhood?

1. Reptilian genitalia don't work like mammalian.
2. Assume you could. Do you really think it would let you?

this explains why Will is so often in a bad mood too, if you get what I mean

...
Well, to start with, they haven't even tried that yet. Not everyone is rushing into fornication.

nah, merely some sort of opening to spray from

Not if you want to avoid wasting most of the semen.

[SOLDIER First]

That was mostly meant as a joke.

[Empiricist]

why would a dragon of darkness be especially good at dealing with a light-saber? An attack that is based on light should actually be super effective

If they can create darkness, they can destroy light. Because that's what creating darkness does. It's common sense!

Isn't darkness the absence of visible light? As opposed to all electromagnetic radiation?

Why? After all, all light is visible to something.

Then shouldn't it be electromagnetic radiation cancellation rather than darkness?

[RangerCado]

Why not just let Meme negotiate?

[GreatWyrmGold]

why would a dragon of darkness be especially good at dealing with a light-saber? An attack that is based on light should actually be super effective

If they can create darkness, they can destroy light. Because that's what creating darkness does. It's common sense!

Isn't darkness the absence of visible light? As opposed to all electromagnetic radiation?

Why? After all, all light is visible to something.

Then shouldn't it be electromagnetic radiation cancellation rather than darkness?

So, fire magic should be "thermal excitation" and technomancy should be "manipulation of artificial systems"? "Darkness Magic" is a nice, convenient term for the stuff.
Especially since it's manipulation as well as creation of darkness.

[Empiricist]

Yeah but it does leave room for ambiguity. I was merely requesting that the specifics were to be stated seeing as darkness is ta rather general term.

[GreatWyrmGold]

Isn't that how most magic stuff is?

[Empiricist]

Not really, Ashley's teleport isn't just teleport, it's teleportation via void movement, Hainuwele has acupuncture based manipulation rather than the power to buff and debuff. Otherwise it turns into a definition debate.