The Giant has used the term "genderqueer" to describe V.
The problem I have with a declaration like that is that words like genderqueer hadn’t even entered the popular consciousness back when Order of the Stick was first being written in 2003.
Rich didn’t imagine V being that type of person back then and didn’t write them as such either. It’s just a clumsy retcon meant to capitalize on current trends, and it shows!
Objectively speaking based on what’s written in the text, V is an elf who presents in such a way that people struggle to assign them a gender. This is played entirely as a joke about how elves are effeminate. When people ask V directly about what gender they are (ie. what pronouns they would like to use), V gives evasive answers. Again as a continuation of the joke.
What’s clear from these interactions is that V does not want to identify as
any gender! Such a description is a closer match to someone who sees themselves as
androgynous rather than someone who changes what gender they identify as based on their whims, which is what
genderqueer actually is!
Because Rich doesn’t understand the people he’s trying to pander to, it limits the amount of depth he can give V as a non-binary character. His attempt to pivot V’s gender from a joke about girly elves to a strong genderqueer icon only ends up being surface level, and a disappointment to any queer reader who may have been drawn in by Rich’s bold declarations.
In a world where people like J.K Rowling exist, the best way to analyze a character remains through “Death of the Author”. V is still a good character (nothing wrong with being a divorced parent), but if Rich wants those progressive brownie points, he’s got to let his writing speak for itself.
So how’d I do
Rolan7? Is there anything you think I missed? You’d know more about this topic than I would.