It's my personal opinion that these attacks should be treated as a declaration of war by the African Union, as it's clear they weren't accidental attacks.
However, Jenkins may have had no knowledge of these attacks, in which case he must immediately remove the AU members from the alliance and renounce any support of these nations.
That's a really dangerous stance to take. What happens if Jenkins says "Fine. War it is."? We will all die. I agree that he should kick out these rogue nations, but we really really are not in a stance to make demands.
Survival is our greatest concern right now, ideologies and revenge are secondary. And Survival is best served by peace until we have make a deal with Jenkins to take out the rogues.
The fact is, either:
A: Jenkins had no knowledge of these attacks, they were attacks by rogue nations within the AU
B: Jenkins did have knowledge of these attacks, and gave his implicit support
Personally, I find scenario A to be the far more likely option, HOWEVER:
In the case of scenario A, allowing the rogue nations (with obvious disregard for Jenkins' leadership, and obvious hostile intent towards the UBA) to remain in the AU, and not forcing them to pay significant reparations, is unacceptable
In the case of scenario B, it doesn't matter what stances we take in regard to the issue, we're still at war
(just to be clear, I find scenario B very unlikely)It's my personal opinion that these attacks should be treated as a declaration of war by the African Union, as it's clear they weren't accidental attacks.
However, Jenkins may have had no knowledge of these attacks, in which case he must immediately remove the AU members from the alliance and renounce any support of these nations.
Please don't take unilateral stances and put them on the bloc forum. This is not your decision but the alliance's one.
I edited my post on the bloc forums for you