Okay, Tiruin. I am not repeating myself to you any more. I have presented answers already to all the questions you have asked. If you have a problem with the answers I gave, state them. Don't make me restate them again and again and again.
When.
Since when have i asked you to restate anything over and over again? Or did it come off as such?
The very
reason I ask you such is that to give a clearer viewpoint. Like what you just did on the bus -- most of which was
unstated earlier.
I'm asking for your viewpoint as we don't have, or share the same point of view on the current matters. I already stated my problem with those questions, and yet you think I'm repeating the point like a blithering idiot.
I feel insulted. Someone of your capability would at least point that out despite it being partly negative in criticism-you aren't. I can see your intent there, and its partly cloudy in its judgement.
How do you view me, as a player?
And isn't it clear enough yet? I'm being skeptical, to forward the point. Lenglon isn't speaking, and this is quitely her last chance to speak-that's what I'm giving. Everyone deserves a second chance.
...
not that anyone will get the Prince. Myself included.I did not receive any rose, nor did I check for any rose (because I am fancy like that to get outta bed and get out of that area where I was in).. The only note he did was where he found me in.
BUT LENGLON CLAIMED TO SEE HIM DOING IT JESUS CHRIST
And praise be to he, sir! Hail!
Now you tell me, in the calmest and unflattering of possible tones that you can make, where madam Lenglon EXPLICITLY said what you claim.
Tell me, and I'll eat my figurative hat and/or freeformschooler.
Go ahead.
tl;dr, if she's lying, please check the first link before you say that at my face.
Praise be to him.
If I were to check back and see how aggressive people were in trying to completely pinpoint others: Leafsnail. How you poke Lenglon comes as more than debating aggression.
Aggression is not a scumtell at all. Not even remotely. And it's needed if players around you are doing stupid shit (like, say, voting for confirmed townies at mylo).
OH YES IT IS IF YOU SEE THE BLOODY CONTEXT. THAT IS NOT AGGRESSION, IT IS BLATANT AND OUTRIGHT PUSHING THE NOTIONS TO THEIR EXTREMES IN ORDER TO IMPLICATE A PERSON--WHILE SAID PERSON
IS SCUM IN YOUR VIEWPOINT, YOU CAN DO IT IN A
BETTER WAY THAN INSINUATING SUCH
UNGRACEFUL COMMENTS.
THAT IS UNBECOMING OF A LADY, SIR. UNBECOMING![/aggression]
The questions I know you'll ask: [...]
Ok, this is getting personal that you think that you can predict what I'll do or ponder. From a biased way, that's disgraceful, but I get your point there.
You and Toaster are both struggling to believe that Lenglon could be scum with Toaster.
Uh huh. No, I'm contending it with you as scum. Toaster has been clean since she [Lenglon] said so earlier (yes, the dirt was the
only thing that dirtied up his innocence.), and thus why I'm leaving my vote on him--there are no hammers, and the day can
only end if someone hilariously shortens, and it would be more than hilarious to see someone else vote Toaster, but it still lies in probability despite the general belief.
In itself, the notion of voting like so also pushes how people watch the votes. You seem to be taking me voting Toaster like it's a fact that you can't quite grasp-as if I'm as blind as a southern cave bat who just yaps on and on to find a way out without listening to any response to figure out where it stands. The analogy seems fit to detail your reaction, as it seems.
I know where my vote goes, and the psychology under being voted and not being voted. The freedom of speech and how someone may keep talking under pressure, no matter how trivial or experienced the person is.
You can see the results, yourself. And apologies if it hit your blood pressure along the way...collateral damage is not what I predicted.
Look, while the puzzle has mostly been solved and all, I'm leaning on the side of skepticism to clear this all up and make the best use of the time given despite what IRL stuff here dictates (just end it already and blah blah blah exams school pressure) but I can take it because I, in my most honest opinion,
know what I'm doing.
(Also its a Wednesday here at the time of posting so relax a bit. C'mon dude. I know that you're a smart fellow, but surely you aren't
that biased or jaded to see me flailing like a fishy fish. :I)
Returning to the point at hand and why I'm skeptic on it. Webadict could've gone with the conventional 'make it up and hope it works' method when replying to Lenglon.
I'm also all for bussing, but those and this marks inconsistency with your linking it to Lenglon.
I don't know what you're talking about. You linked the post in which webadict basically proved that he was scum by claiming an impossible night action result (and also a block he didn't actually do). How does "a post in which webadict kills himself" contradict the theory that "webadict wanted to die so that Lenglon could get insane town credit for bringing down a mafia member"?
Yeah, ok, settling the point-I also get the feeling on webadict. We both know he's a cunning and sly player, but the query stands on that notion I uphold above.
He could've gone with that method rather than push an incredibility to favor a mafioso. He could make it up, and then solidify that Lenglon targeted him at that certain point in time (compare: objection to subversion. After the role is seen, which would give better clarity to whom to trust? This is hypothetical, but an answer would be appreciated.)
That is where the insane town credit comes in, and how it relates to people's sense of logic. Mine may be skewed, bent or even turned around in a parabola that it doesn't make sense when its shaped as itself, but that point is a point to ponder upon.
What I've been saying before on checking Lenglon as a superficial suspicion? That's just a ruse that I'm saying in order to diversify the suspicion between you and her. You could say a reaction test of sorts..I don't know the exact term for it. However that note on your description on the N3 TWS? Its matching what I'm pondering about, and the 'mishap' on N3, which is what I subtly termed earlier...I was thinking about it for more than 2 days.
Note that I keep tabs on people.
Also what is this. Proves what -1 vote?! What are you even going on at that point? It's confusing more often than not.
It's pretty obvious. See how when I voted it counted against the extension. And how when I unvoted the extension was granted.
...This is what confused me then, and caused the succeeding querying.
...Your vote is a universal -1, huh?
.
You may ask for an extension or shorten by putting the respective word in bold. Extensions require 33% of players to agree minus any players opposing, and requires at least three players. Extends are for 48 hours including weekends, and there may only be a maximum of four Extends.
Did a
check on everything beforehand. If what you say is true, then it should be sensible to point that the extend/shorten votes would also carry on when you had a double vote (...I mean, wow. That is one in depth depression that it stalls time.)
Here till
here, we had 6 total votes. Excluding yours. Disregarded.
Same here....That continues long onwards.
This tiny point has been answered in my memory but I lack the time to find the answer. Anyway...
Here till
..err...Right.
Here until
here has ZU only voting, which was the reason for the motivator thing I appended to you, LS..unless I missed the other one.
...And nothing else, then TWS died.
HOWEVER, the note was on
semantics (x more
people to extend..stuff stuff)..I can't really fathom how you say you've a confirmed -1 vote
in that manner to also attach it to a
lynchvote.
One question you missed:
Any reason/lore behind your double-vote/lacking vote power? Is your vote a single-use effect weakness?Lenglon: Speak, or forever hold your peace.
PPE: ...
Err. Why was that the only thing you said, Lenglon? Also take care. Same to you Leafsnail..
Toaster eat yummy dirt and post more. :I