Actually, from my viewpoint, you have Schrodinger's vote, being both a double vote and a minus 1 vote until the point that it is observed. I don't know if you're lying or not, and I can't know it, really, until it is demonstrated. As a result I'm taking precautions against either case. your vote or unvote or whatever it is isn't why I think you're scum, it's simply why I didn't want votes lying around for you to hammer in case it is a double-vote. I see no reason to go with your plan.
There are no hammers today. And you were clearly attempting to make "OMG LEAFSNAIL STILL HAS TWO VOTES" a thing
This right here is why I hate talking to you. You can't read tone to save your life. I was clearly saying that I plan on taking precautions against you still having two votes, and that at day start, when hammers were still available, I didn't want a vote lying around for you to hammer. You're taking that statement and blowing it up into massive proportions, and now you're going to get mad at me for calling you on trying to shove your idiotic words into my mouth. That kind of... bovine fecal matter, is absolutely infuriating. until you can learn how words work, I see no reason to bother humoring your stupidity. If you raise a point worth addressing, I'm sure someone else will mention it.
Changing from following someone fully to only following them part of the way. For some reason. And then not having any suspicions about this.
...Well given how-
Lenglon: COuld you detial how you exactly followed people? The following in this notion somehow seems like its more subjective than not.
..Also to give my piece on it, I really think that's a red herring as given though I've no action (ability-wise), I did do an RP action as Vector did say everything is possible, but not everything possible can lead to the answer.
...So yeah.
There's no inconsistency with you being attacked. We know Toaster did the dirt thing, and Jim did the dream attack. There are no unaccounted for actions other than the mafiakill on Jim.
There is, given that Toaster claimed giving a rose. And I'm pretty sure I did not accept it like how he stated such.
..Nor am I even sure that giving someone a rose means shoving dirt up their face. :I
Nor am I sure that the dream attack was directly correlated to my nightmare given how the effects were all in a new paragraph-in semantics this means that the connection of both was...well, I'm siding with Lenglon's note that Jim's gravedirt touch is the most plausible idea.
Lenglon are you sure sure sure that Toaster Toaster Toaster targeted me? Did you see what she was holding?
There isn't really much to say, when I say that "I followed X to Y's room", that's almost word for word what my PM says, although N2 it was "found X coming from where Y was sleeping", now that I am going back and double-checking it. I can't get more specific than that without breaking the no quoting mod pms rule. Last night was slightly different, the formula was "I followed X from room to room, and eventually concluded X is searching for Y". Leafsnail seems to be making an issue of this, I think it was simply because you weren't in your room, although I don't know for sure, since I'm not the mod and didn't write the PM. I didn't get any notification of Toaster holding anything as she searched for you, but I also didn't get any notification of her holding anything the
first time I followed her, back on night 2, and her night action target (web) didn't die that night either.
Author
Topic: The Lonely Prince: He Who Shall Serve (Read 194729 times)