Actually, I've just thought of an easy solution to this vote thing, if Lenglon is so certain I'm lying. Me and Lenglon can vote for me. Tiruin and Toaster can vote for Lenglon. If I'm lying about my vote being negative, I will lynch myself. If we use a shorten vote (ie, and have someone other than me hammer shorten), there's no way for me to manipulate the vote.
Unvote,
Leafsnail.
...Toaster had 5 total sentences as he claimed. Lenglon claimed process of elimination in watching Toaster's snoopy snooping.
So how doesn't it not make sense? What doesn't make sense is how I got the taste of dirt, yet she gave a reasonable idea right darn there to explain Jim's...being Jim'd.
So either you're lying on doing nothing (and withholding vote as you still have 2 votes) and abstaining from voting yesterday
I really do not understand what you are getting at here at all. I am saying that Lenglon's flavour makes no sense at all. He is a lily. He is not good at things. He follows people. He thinks the prince is pure. There is no relation between any of these four things, making it not a credible claim. I am making a comparison to Toaster, who has been able to give a relatively coherent flavour claim.
I have absolutely no idea how my negative vote could possibly relate to this.
Tiruin narrows her eyes at this statement.
"That is illogical. A cursed dancer has nothing to lose-and doing it deliberately doesn't even go anywhere near any kind of match. What suspicion was on Okami beforehand? What did she have to lose? What pressure was on her to even so such?
Have you heard of WIFOM before? The fact that players would look back and think "What reason would webadict have to organize a bus?" is a reason to organize a bus.
"The only logical conclusion I can see is that the more 'useful' target was another mafioso--and said one, being a highly voted suspect in days prior."
He wouldn't be able to organize it unless Lenglon was his partner. I guess he might've just snatched the opportunity, but that seems bizarre.
..Problem is that this is a past tense format.
As in, you're...already cheating on your lover if you're here. And he 'couldn't love you because of x and y' is so much of an understatement.
I don't understand what you mean again! Yes it's in the past tense format, because it happened last night. Which was in the past. The cheating on my lover happened years and years before the game started.
Technically, you did say flavor. You just said the generality of it.
Expound.
If you want to waste your time reading about detailed fluff then sure! Vector has already directly told me this line of inquiry is not related to the game.
I remembered the moment I decided to be unfaithful (years and years ago), on a summer's day. We were pretending to be friends. I looked at her face, and decided I could have more.
I tried to shake off that feeling, and to keep loving her, but it remained festering inside me. Deep down, I felt dissatisfied.
I began waking up and felt a similar feeling about the Prince, feeling that I would never be able to satisfy him with the terrible melancholic state I was in. I then fully woke up with it still weighing on me (get it like the shoes I wear).
Mini-puzzle my backhand.
I had nothing. nothing nothing Noooooothing to know about Griffy back there, at all. No hint. No tip. No literature-based foreshadowing in my flavor that touched the young prince. Sure, I talked to Horatio about it, but he said nothing nor hinted anything about a younger Prince at all. Vice versa goes on him-reading his role, he knew nothing (ok, my past and me :I) about me--he knew the details, but not who I was, just who would match with his inspect. And by inspect, I thoroughly mean flavor-inspector given how he'll inspect people.
Yes, you weren't told everything. You had to work some stuff out. That's why it's a
puzzle. In your original claim you talked about having loved a foreign prince. That was your clue. Griffionday was told he had to find someone in the castle. That was his clue. If you put the two together, it would become obvious that you are linked.
On the ZU/Soli/Jim thing? Sure, the two acolytes would've said stuff about their flavor--just as ZU did back in the day who had detailed his everything. Jim was town--any townie would've revealed bad stuff..something which ZU knew and said. However said puzzle didn't come to fruition unless Jim was actually a walking time bomb who shouldn't say that because either she's restricted to, or its a trivial notion due to all the vagueness about our knowledge on her.
Yes, ZU and Soli received hints as to the nature of Jim. Jim received some hints as to her own nature too. No, they weren't told anything explicitly. THAT'S WHAT MAKES IT A PUZZLE
Which reminds me about how you persecuted him: Base reason being only one line when I asked - that you thought he was scum.
When asked on that, you complained to having to list it down again. I want you to do that now on grounds of total doubt -- list what he said did make him scum as opposed to what he's revealing at the time that doesn't.
If you have problems with my reasons for voting ZU then state them rather than forcing me to pointlessly repost the same things again.
Because it isn't pointless when I ask again on the matter despite it looking similar to being pointless. Viewpoint difference.
I can't even remember anymore. Again, I ask you to look at the reasons I stated when I voted him and asking me questions about those. If I remember correctly it boiled down to
- mad passivity
- doing absolutely no scumhunting at any point (these were my initial reasons - see "He's being ridiculously passive, I don't think he's even called anyone scum all game.", which is a statement I still fully stand by)
- Solifuge's flavour seemed to imply that his role was anti-town before he fell in love with the Prince. It would have made sense for another incoming agent to not fall in love and remain anti-town.
And I take it you're thoroughly convinced that you aren't accepting any doubts or speculation on the matter-especially when said matter has its crux in how you relate x and y? What do all those colors pertain to, as a categorical generality?
Oh, and where exactly in her claim (please link) did she go wrong? Sure, its vague-but I don't think I received an answer from you about how she did Soli in without chance of backlash? The kill-flavor matches the deed.
I'll accept doubts, but I have yet to see anything even approaching another solution to the puzzle. If you want to make a case for why I am wrong about the puzzle and you are mafia then go ahead.
White - purity, youth. Red - sexuality, passion, availability. Black - death, age.
You mean Lenglon's claim? I don't doubt she has some kind of target detection ability (or possibly a role cop). My problem with her claim is the way her flavour doesn't link to her role. That implies to me that she has mafia-ish reasons for her role, that she's afraid to claim.
He did?
*ahem sorry can't check back and it would be best if you link it thanks and sorry! D:*
I mean, she did?
I can only vaguely remember, but I think ZU confirmed that he was the one wearing a sackcloth in the OP.
> In ages? Why?
> You were able to dance because...?
Remember my claim? I have cursed (black) iron shoes that made me unable to walk properly, yet alone dance. But when I got here, there was music playing that made my feet feel light again. We now know the source of that music was griffinpup.
..Hmph. Makes sense. However in that context-you also did something with a certain other someone which did refer directly to love and its devious fault on love. Wouldn't you agree on that?
Yep. My role is clearly meant to have strong parallels with webadict II's, in the same way that webadict I's had them with Ottofar. I suspect Toaster and Lenglon have them too to fit the pattern, but that Lenglon is withholding his.