GriffinpupNQT: rephrase your question. I've been meaning to ask you to do so, but I've forgotten a few times. Inter-game meta literally means nothing to me.
Ah, right, advanced lingo.
Often in mafia we talk about someone's 'meta', but that's just a jargon way of referring to our sense of their general playstyle. So for example, I know that Dariush is generally belligerent and unpleasant. Where he appears more co-operative and approaches pleasantness (as in Mafia & Masons and Revolution 2), he's probably playing scum. I was wondering whether you thought your experience with players in other games that you've played or read would in any way inform your read on those players. So, at the beginning of this game I noted that you were hostile to me based on my behaviour in Revolution 2, but this doesn't seem like good town play as I can now confirm that I was deliberately playing uncooperatively in that game as a part of a successful spy strategy. In fact, those that knew my general playstyle would have seen I was acting out of character (compare to Revolution 1 in which I was incensed at being mislabelled a spy and worked ceaselessly to clear my name). But meta can be manipulated. If players expect you to act in a certain way, you can hide your alignment by playing up to expectations. What do you think?
Imperial GuardsmanI dont have proof of anything so im going to rolecop based on "cosmic luck."
Uh... was this a slip of the keyboard, or did you really just claim to be the rolecop in a more than hypothetical sense?
Author
Topic: BM XLII - Game Over: Mafia Win! (Read 75984 times)