Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4

Author Topic: Possible Continuation of Lordship (Off Topic)  (Read 3472 times)

Maldevious

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Possible Continuation of Lordship (Off Topic)
« on: June 25, 2013, 06:51:05 am »

I was recently messaged by a former player of Lordship, inquiring as to whether there was any possibility of unlocking and continuing the game. As it has been a month and tempers and emotions have likely cooled, I said I'd consider it.

As part of that consideration, I wanted to ask the forum and gauge the thoughts of other former players. Is there any interest in this? Should I unlock it? Should I let sleeping dogs lie? The other possibility is me starting another suggestion game, which I've been contemplating as well. Just wanted to get some input from my former (and other prospective) players.

If you have no idea what I'm talking about (and would like to read 230 pages of thread), check out the link in my signature. Looking forward to seeing what you all think.
Logged

GreatWyrmGold

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sane, by the local standards.
    • View Profile
Re: Possible Continuation of Lordship (Off Topic)
« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2013, 07:19:02 am »

I'm still interested in what happens to Sir Stone.

However, I suspect that the issues that caused the conflicts were less temporary passions than the buildup of tension between clashing psyches. Put into layman's terms, if the same people show up the same thing has a high likelihood of occurring.
Logged
Sig
Are you a GM with players who haven't posted? TheDelinquent Players Help will have Bay12 give you an action!
[GreatWyrmGold] gets a little crown. May it forever be his mark of Cain; let no one argue pointless subjects with him lest they receive the same.

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: Possible Continuation of Lordship (Off Topic)
« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2013, 07:29:49 am »

I would enjoy it.

Creation of an OOC thread could maybe help to divert conflicts, though I'm not so sure about it's usefulness.

Put into layman's terms, if the same people show up the same thing has a high likelihood of occurring.
It's kinda this reasoning that original game earned it's last strike. People started assuming that some posters suggestions were bad without even reading and/or considering them, and directly raged against them. Unlike what the reactions of various players would suggest, the incidents weren't Gervassen's fault.

Primary problem was that people failed to see that the game was indeed a game, and desperately clinged to an "idealized" version of Sir Stone and his surroundings.
Logged

GreatWyrmGold

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sane, by the local standards.
    • View Profile
Re: Possible Continuation of Lordship (Off Topic)
« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2013, 08:19:32 am »

I was actually referring to the fact that people acted the way they acted and had a high probability of doing similarly the second time.
Still, I suppose you bring up a decent point.
Logged
Sig
Are you a GM with players who haven't posted? TheDelinquent Players Help will have Bay12 give you an action!
[GreatWyrmGold] gets a little crown. May it forever be his mark of Cain; let no one argue pointless subjects with him lest they receive the same.

Gervassen

  • Bay Watcher
  • Be aggressive.
    • View Profile
Re: Possible Continuation of Lordship (Off Topic)
« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2013, 11:11:40 am »

Wow. Glad to see that this could be a thing again. But it'd be a shame if we just used this opportunity to rehash a bunch of old grievances based on our subjective hurt feelings. Objectively, we can agree that one thing is certain: there is no clear replacement Lordship-like game on the horizon in these forums. A month has shown various announced attempts, and at least five threads openly tried to reclaim part of its energy. They seem to sputter out. 

We can also agree that the game left off before building to the story arc's proper climax. I would like to see it restart for this reason, even if my participation were zero. My participation was darkened by episodes of antagonism, mainly because I was trying to play Stone as an ambitious and grimdark character intent upon climbing upward; while others wanted the standard dutiful knight.

I think, several times, I did go too grim... but the reaction of others was moral outrage, where amused eye-rolling would have been more appropriate. I say let's start it back up with a better frame of reference that we're all in a game, and that none of us really sacrifice newborn babies to Cthulhu in real life. Except perhaps Origami Psycho.
Logged
The way's paved with knaves that I've horribly slain.
See me coming, better run for them hills.
Listen up now...

             -- Babycakes

GreatWyrmGold

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sane, by the local standards.
    • View Profile
Re: Possible Continuation of Lordship (Off Topic)
« Reply #5 on: June 25, 2013, 11:14:07 am »

I think one issue was that neither side really ever bent. At best, a few people shifted to a position closer to the center.

Gerv, with a lot of your suggestions you were the only or one of the few behind them. Mathematically, they were unlikely to work. I'd like you to change your image of what Stone "should" be a few steps to the more optimistic.
Everyone else, this is a (suggested) compromise, so change yours a step or two to the more pragmatic.

Is this acceptable?
Logged
Sig
Are you a GM with players who haven't posted? TheDelinquent Players Help will have Bay12 give you an action!
[GreatWyrmGold] gets a little crown. May it forever be his mark of Cain; let no one argue pointless subjects with him lest they receive the same.

IamanElfCollaborator

  • Bay Watcher
  • Resident Shipper God and Freyjapiller
    • View Profile
Re: Possible Continuation of Lordship (Off Topic)
« Reply #6 on: June 25, 2013, 11:20:39 am »

Christ, the RAGE. THE RAGE,MAN, THE RAGE.

Ahem.

I was originally interested in having a look at Lordship before it vanished. I only saw what happened in the last two pages. Could someone be so kind as to explain what happened?

GreatWyrmGold

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sane, by the local standards.
    • View Profile
Re: Possible Continuation of Lordship (Off Topic)
« Reply #7 on: June 25, 2013, 11:24:04 am »

IC or OOC?
Logged
Sig
Are you a GM with players who haven't posted? TheDelinquent Players Help will have Bay12 give you an action!
[GreatWyrmGold] gets a little crown. May it forever be his mark of Cain; let no one argue pointless subjects with him lest they receive the same.

IamanElfCollaborator

  • Bay Watcher
  • Resident Shipper God and Freyjapiller
    • View Profile
Re: Possible Continuation of Lordship (Off Topic)
« Reply #8 on: June 25, 2013, 11:24:24 am »

Which caused the ending of the thread?

kahn1234

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Possible Continuation of Lordship (Off Topic)
« Reply #9 on: June 25, 2013, 11:27:39 am »

Christ, the RAGE. THE RAGE,MAN, THE RAGE.

Ahem.

I was originally interested in having a look at Lordship before it vanished. I only saw what happened in the last two pages. Could someone be so kind as to explain what happened?

Long story. In short, a small number of people kept throwing hissy fits, which started arguments.

Personally i would love to see it back. I was really enjoying the story, and was very sad to see it go.

GreatWyrmGold

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sane, by the local standards.
    • View Profile
Re: Possible Continuation of Lordship (Off Topic)
« Reply #10 on: June 25, 2013, 11:28:19 am »

The biggest problem was that, while each update ended a series of arguments...the tensions remained.

As did some of the longer-term arguments.
Logged
Sig
Are you a GM with players who haven't posted? TheDelinquent Players Help will have Bay12 give you an action!
[GreatWyrmGold] gets a little crown. May it forever be his mark of Cain; let no one argue pointless subjects with him lest they receive the same.

IamanElfCollaborator

  • Bay Watcher
  • Resident Shipper God and Freyjapiller
    • View Profile
Re: Possible Continuation of Lordship (Off Topic)
« Reply #11 on: June 25, 2013, 11:29:23 am »

Pantheon, but with less buildup, essentially. :P

I do agree though, it's a shame it went down.

GreatWyrmGold

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sane, by the local standards.
    • View Profile
Re: Possible Continuation of Lordship (Off Topic)
« Reply #12 on: June 25, 2013, 11:32:23 am »

That, and it was OOC and not IC disputes.

And no worlds were devastated by the wars.

And, thankfully, there was no Udil.
Logged
Sig
Are you a GM with players who haven't posted? TheDelinquent Players Help will have Bay12 give you an action!
[GreatWyrmGold] gets a little crown. May it forever be his mark of Cain; let no one argue pointless subjects with him lest they receive the same.

IamanElfCollaborator

  • Bay Watcher
  • Resident Shipper God and Freyjapiller
    • View Profile
Re: Possible Continuation of Lordship (Off Topic)
« Reply #13 on: June 25, 2013, 11:34:02 am »

Let's not bring up that. Fond memories though, especially when....
Anyway, is there any hope of bringing the game back from where it ended? Or in any continuity with the old one?

GreatWyrmGold

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sane, by the local standards.
    • View Profile
Re: Possible Continuation of Lordship (Off Topic)
« Reply #14 on: June 25, 2013, 11:34:22 am »

Which one?
Logged
Sig
Are you a GM with players who haven't posted? TheDelinquent Players Help will have Bay12 give you an action!
[GreatWyrmGold] gets a little crown. May it forever be his mark of Cain; let no one argue pointless subjects with him lest they receive the same.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4