I really don't get this whole "no backwards compatibility" thing.
It would open the consoles to some of the greatest gaming libraries to date. I mean, PS3 is a nightmare to emulate, sure, but the PS2 isn't. Why doesn't Sony support PS2 backward compatiblity? It'd make a pretty penny on selling digitalised (but otherwise unaltered) gaming classics from the PS2 era. The market for retro games is there (as proven by GoG), and the PS2 had some really snazzy games, like Silent Hill 2 (The original version, not the HD bullshit) and tons more. It'd expand their initial roster of games immensely, and they wouldn't need to rely so heavily on blockbuster games to start a console off.
Also, I do not like the Xbone or the PS4. Yeah, one has a much better developed common sense than the other, but that does not mean it's not guilty of some really stupid ideas (Hey! You can now take control from someone else online and officially become that guy! isn't that cool? You can also pester everyone about which games you're playing, something no-one really cares about! You can also record yourself playing games, but we won't tell how much you can edit the footage, where it will be uploaded to and all that stuff Let's Players and people who record games for a living need. We are so clever, we should begin building a bigger money bin for all the profit we'll surely make./sarcasm)
And I doubt that the indie developers will get much love from the Xbone and the PS4. They need massive titles that make a massive amount of money, which means they'll probably go on the path of "The copy of whatever's popular will surely give us some green!" and extend a gigantic middle finger to indie developers with innovative ideas who are unwilling to pay tremendous amounts of money needed to get their game published.
But those are just my incoherent ramblings of a person who likes consoles but dreads this new generation which isn't a new generation, but more like an extension of the current one.