I am asking why you are trying to pass off a list of ailments that generally affect both men and women as a "female problem."
Forget about my reasonings unless it would be absolutely necessary for the discussion.
First point is made.
Besides it being a generally unpleasant place where you can expect 5%-15% of first time bess students to completely flip out over upon deployment, it also supports a healthy amount of claustrophobia.
But women and men on a classified secret boat in undisclosed waters under the ocean in close contact and limited space and long watch duties and hot racking and . . . well the subs cant airlift off every pregnant woman. They have enough issue housing violators and stressed out headcases.
On a more practical level, issues such as supply and disposable of solid waste become a thing. Feminine products I suppose could be flushed with the rest of the waste, but . . .
Back when I was in there was talk about adding females to the boats, starting with the officers. That didn't happen afaik.
EDIT: Also the whole 16 hours days. thing. 20 often enough. and that's before chow.
Argument.
EDIT: Also the whole 16 hours days. thing. 20 often enough. and that's before chow.
Seriously? Your argument is that women can't work long enough hours?
Point.
More points + Arguments
Points points + Arguments
"Relate to" means to connect to or show connections. It does not mean:
I am asking why you are trying to pass off a list of ailments that generally affect both men and women as a "female problem."
"To show a singular connection without acknowledgement to all others."
Make no assumptions on who you speak to, the words spoken should be all that are judged.
Also where is this NHS study on Anaemia?
This is the only one I could find.And as terrifying as redneck surgeons would be, they acknowledge:
"Bleeding in the stomach and intestines is the most common cause of iron deficiency anaemia in men and in women who have been through the menopause (when a woman’s monthly periods stop).
Some of the causes of gastrointestinal bleeding are outlined below."
And on the same page:
"In women of reproductive age, periods are the most common cause of iron deficiency anaemia."
And over 10% of women suffer from heavy menstrual bleeding.
Though to answer a better question at why I'm bringing up the fact that we're sexually dimorphic species, it's because we're sexually dimorphic species.
Wow, I am impressed with the amount of misogynistic "few women have the physical strength to be infantry" comments that have sprung up while I was out.
Oh yes, of course, that is why we lower the expectations when it comes to female rates. Something something misogyny privilege and straw.
One point left unanswered [probably the only relevant one when it comes to female rates serving in submarine and other attack craft at sea]:
- What is the practicality of having to retrofit existing vessels with facilities equipped to deal with female hygiene, health and unplanned/planned pregnancies.
Let's ban women from physical labor and all mental exercises if they're so incapable? Seems pretty odd to me that so many [mostly males] find it so easy to dismiss females as a soldier possibility, despite the training and screening they do go through. I know plenty of scrawny, weak-willed sniveling drama cases that happen to be male, I dunno, just seems odd to me.
When mistakes can cost the lives of many due to physical inability yes. Banning? Then you've just gone and gotten rid of women's equal opportunity in the armed forces.
Make it so that equal opportunity means equal testing, all is well.
And while your commendable dismissal of weak-willed sniveling drama cases is wonderful, it truly is, but unless they comprise world armies that's hardly relevant. I suppose psychology and the army's poor treatment of it is something to discuss, but probably for a more related thread.