Wait, so they've got some kinda corporatocracy? When did our queen find that out?
mmmgmgm, I'm still hesitant about taking such overt actions so early.
Why they could pay attention to low-level pirates: pirates decrease profits. Therefore, eliminating pirates = increased profits. Question is where they draw the line for cost effectiveness in their anti-piracy efforts. Are they the train-owners from Butch Cassidy & the Sundance Kid, or are they notch?
Seeing as how the pirates are running quiet/jamming satellites, they obviously aren't notch.
However, since the rig is 'janky', this implies piracy isn't exceptionally profitable, which also infers either 1. A profligate market or 2. An exceptionally small market. There's either an ass-load of low-level pirates about or no one wants to touch pirated goods. I'm personally inclined to go with the former, but that might be cultural bias and is still, at best, just a guess. The Admin very well could be the train owner, (millions for defense, not one cent for tribute!), and the pirates are beggared because no one wants to buy their products & call down the Administration's draconian wrath..
As for ID'ing the human's equipment, I'm still highly skeptical. We were able to pick apart our ship for all the useful bits because it was our ship. To us the grey box looks like a grey box, not the xK42-9i variable oscillation control unit, and the displays read 'gibberish' and 'more gibberish'.
-The only way we could learn anything meaningful about this is if we spent (hours-days) observing the humans operate the craft, can gather a significant (read: omniscient) amount of data on what the craft is currently doing, and have super-computer levels of information processing. Let's take the last one first: does our hivemind have super-computer levels of information processing? (not including sensory-data processing Mr. Technicality. Can we keep track of (a very large amount) of variables as they change in real time and establish patterns and correlations between them, (multiples, not one-to-one, and between different groups of said correlations as well, in multiples)?)
Strike me down if I'm reading too far into this and buzzkilling the thread.