Leafsnail:
Dem: Is not an immediate threat. He's been offline for almost a week now, so I doubt he'll be back to NK tonight, killing the other scum first can buy us more time.
1. Scum is always a threat
2. Tiruin would not allow the night to end with someone unreplaced and one scum remaining, as that would lead to possibly confirming the replaced slot as town/scum
3. I am voting for the other scum, Vector
1. Disagreed on account of him not being active at all: Yes he could just be logged out, but I don't think that's likely as he has shown up before as "active" without posting. If he's not been active at all he very well could have forgotten about the game, meaning if we lynch the other scum we get a kill-less night.
2. That could only confirm him as town, and even then only if he wasn't overly scummy afterwards... I don't think Tiruin would stop the game just because of that.
3. Noted. Your question was why we're not voting for Dem or Vector when our votes can be FAR more productively used to apply pressure to get reads on people who have replaced in.
I am calling for a lynch of both mafia members. I don't know what you mean about the extend - my most recent deadline has been on mafiascum which has 2-3 week days, so I forgot how fast deadlines roll around here.
Why were you calling for lynch votes when you thought we had 2ish weeks left?
That is so not what is going on here. Vector has already told us when she'll be back, and Demdemeh should be being replaced soon; you seem AWFULLY hopeful to force a lynch through before either of them can defend themselves.
Not true.
-addressed later-
If we really are to go with "We can never ever question people who aren't posting" then we are going to meaninglessly lynch a townie today.
Could I get more detail on why that is not true?
Well, you cant really question them now can you? If they're not here then you're questioning a wall, getting more and more suspicious of your target while allowing scum to run free.
Your entire case on me seems to come down to "you forgot to ask for an extension". You haven't actually addressed the detailed cases I have made against both Vector and Dem. You should, because I think both of those cases are damning (especially Dem asking for a shorten even though the person she was voting wasn't in the lead).
Partly yes, but I'm more concerned about the way that you are tunneling the TWO people who are unavailable to respond, and the way that you are deflecting my case with bi-syllabic answers. You have mentioned other people as possible scum, but you are only building cases on the two who aren't here.
Your detailed cases have yet to interact with your targets. Seeing as you've only made a couple points for each of them; I'd hardly call your cases "damning" without interaction with the subjects. Speaking of your cases;
The person he was voting for clearly wasn't getting lynched. So why did he ask for a shorten? If he wanted RangerCado to be lynched, he should have voted for him while making the shorten request. If he wanted Griffionday to be lynched he should have been trying to convince other people to vote him, and certainly should not have been trying to prevent that from happening by shortening the day. As it is I cannot see any explanation for his actions other than "He was scum and didn't want to get into trouble for placing the last vote on a cop".
Vector should know better, and the way she didn't miss a beat after her initial attack was shown to be wrong was suspicious.
Lastly, I find Vector's silence on this whole matter baffling. I think she may have been hoping that with Ford quiet, nobody would notice what Dem was doing.
Almost completely conjecture, and nothing that doesn't scream scum groping around for something to build a case with.