Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 74

Author Topic: The revolutionary design bureau (OOC)  (Read 43533 times)

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The revolutionary design bureau (OOC)
« Reply #690 on: May 17, 2013, 04:22:00 am »

Holy shit, we just went all blitzkrieg on Capia! O.O

Nice work gents, now lets focus on bringing the Morovians to their knees, considerign we sunk the near-entirity of the capian fleet via airpower, I think those Morovians will think twice.

EDIT: UR, Helicopter production should wait until we've got ones that are better than anything that we have. I'd rather not sacrifice production of our Zephyrs for them.
« Last Edit: May 17, 2013, 04:23:38 am by Taricus »
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

tryrar

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The revolutionary design bureau (OOC)
« Reply #691 on: May 17, 2013, 04:28:24 am »

....Goddamnit, we have several pretty good proposals already, WAAAY more than what I can vote for(and want to vote for). I'm forced to prioritize with this Criteria:

1)Modernizing our tanks
2)Attempt to bring parity with our surface ships(easier now that most of the Capian navy is at the bottom of the ocean). This includes sonar upgrades and better cruisers
3)I'm liking that gun brood came up with better than the 240mm. A smaller gun that has at least parity with our 160mms means more can be fit onto a ship(and on smaller ships), and is a nice compromise between the HVG-80 and the 160mm(meaning we can probably forgo 80mms entirely except for AA)
4)Tar, you think you'll get enough votes for your tank without me? I'm torn between keeping Badger relevant by converting it to a TD, and saving this last vote for something else that might come along
Logged
This fort really does sit on the event horizon of madness and catastrophe
No. I suppose there are similarities, but I'm fairly certain angry birds doesn't let me charge into a battalion of knights with a car made of circular saws.

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The revolutionary design bureau (OOC)
« Reply #692 on: May 17, 2013, 04:39:14 am »

I reckon I could Tryrar.
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

tryrar

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The revolutionary design bureau (OOC)
« Reply #693 on: May 17, 2013, 04:42:35 am »

Cool, since we'd actually gotten a good compromise that was halfway reasonable, I'd like it to go through
Logged
This fort really does sit on the event horizon of madness and catastrophe
No. I suppose there are similarities, but I'm fairly certain angry birds doesn't let me charge into a battalion of knights with a car made of circular saws.

Brood

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The revolutionary design bureau (OOC)
« Reply #694 on: May 17, 2013, 04:43:07 am »

Well the 80mm lacks the power for heavy ships but the 160 still penetrates reliably, so the idea is a gun that has a higer rate of fire then the 160mm while maintaining or surpassing it's power, once it's done I have 2 new ships in mind for the next turn to take advantage of it.

I'm still voting for his tank at the moment, for now it's 2nd place on my list of potential, beneath my new cannon because land based we are doing well sea based we're basically stuck staying near the coast because our deep sea fleet is to weak.

I would like to see a 240mm cannon as well for ships, something that can be used on medium class ships for long range power since the 320mm has to much kick.

Oh and this is Ukrainians project A.
A. Retool half of 1 zephyr factory to helicopters and half to transport planes, than expand halves to full factories. (Logistics are important, we'll retool the second factory, once we produce more modern fighters)

He didn't put phasing out the older models from frontline duties in unless I totally missed it.
« Last Edit: May 17, 2013, 04:45:20 am by Brood »
Logged

3_14159

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The revolutionary design bureau (OOC)
« Reply #695 on: May 17, 2013, 04:45:57 am »

Remember:
Quote
The Capian navy most likely has one recently constructed Cruisers left with one more under construction and a hand full of other ships. They no longer outweigh your fleet, but may still pose a threat.

As for the tank, I reckon I'll vote for it, too, as a heavy tank and by no means completely replacing the K-1.
Logged

tryrar

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The revolutionary design bureau (OOC)
« Reply #696 on: May 17, 2013, 04:49:59 am »

A little farther down, he put in strategy plan Alpha that said basically the same thing. I quote:

Quote from: UR
Alpha:
Suggest  government to put remaining feathers and wolverines on secondary roles, like supplying, ASW patrols (and swarming single surface ships) , training aircrafts for newbie pilots as those aircrafts are obsolete for intended uses and we need to save pilots from stupid deaths
Logged
This fort really does sit on the event horizon of madness and catastrophe
No. I suppose there are similarities, but I'm fairly certain angry birds doesn't let me charge into a battalion of knights with a car made of circular saws.

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The revolutionary design bureau (OOC)
« Reply #697 on: May 17, 2013, 04:51:09 am »

Hmm... Think now is the time to start designing our own aircraft carriers? They'll only be small escort carriers, but we can build them.

EDIT: Nevermind, we'd need a larger dockyard for them.
« Last Edit: May 17, 2013, 04:53:24 am by Taricus »
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

Brood

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The revolutionary design bureau (OOC)
« Reply #698 on: May 17, 2013, 04:52:00 am »

Ahhhh ok I missed that 1.
Logged

tryrar

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The revolutionary design bureau (OOC)
« Reply #699 on: May 17, 2013, 04:52:34 am »

Remember:
Quote
The Capian navy most likely has one recently constructed Cruisers left with one more under construction and a hand full of other ships. They no longer outweigh your fleet, but may still pose a threat.
Exactly why I'm trying to design a pocket battlecruiser able to handle the recoil of 2 320mm guns.

Well, tar, we'd probably need a little more displacement for that(we only have a yard capable of 4000 tons ATM, until and unless Brood's proposal to double that goes through)
Logged
This fort really does sit on the event horizon of madness and catastrophe
No. I suppose there are similarities, but I'm fairly certain angry birds doesn't let me charge into a battalion of knights with a car made of circular saws.

Brood

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The revolutionary design bureau (OOC)
« Reply #700 on: May 17, 2013, 04:53:39 am »

It will I hope, we need bigger ships.
Logged

Ukrainian Ranger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The revolutionary design bureau (OOC)
« Reply #701 on: May 17, 2013, 04:55:34 am »

Quote
9: Design a 120mm ship based cannon with high velocity to at minamum match the 160mm cannon and if possible surpass it also add an auto loader system built into it to enable the best possible rate of fire. Focus on velocity and accuracy.
I think reverse engineering 100mm Capian gun is a way faster solution for a new gun. Remember Capia is ahead of us, why not steal their design, while improving it a bit? 100mm is a good weapon for arming lighter frigates and torpedo focused destroyers

Quote
EDIT: UR, Helicopter production should wait until we've got ones that are better than anything that we have. I'd rather not sacrifice production of our Zephyrs for them.
Well, half of zephyr production. We'll produce 60 something-less Zephyrs for that turn, that's less than 1\6 of our current Zephyr numbers. Shouldn't influence our war in the air much. But new transport planes and helicopters will aid our logistics considerably
And those helicopters are great for suppling we have nothing better.


Quote
Hmm... Think now is the time to start designing our own aircraft carriers? They'll only be small escort carriers, but we can build them.
Nope, no real benefit for the naval war like that. And too likely to get sunk
But I am a bit biased, doubt that I will give a single vote to naval projects
Logged
War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.

Brood

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The revolutionary design bureau (OOC)
« Reply #702 on: May 17, 2013, 04:58:13 am »

I'm designing it to be better then the 100mm they have, I don't like the idea of just reusing enemy designs for our advancements.
Logged

tryrar

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The revolutionary design bureau (OOC)
« Reply #703 on: May 17, 2013, 04:59:19 am »

I actually wouldn't be against building something along the lines of a carrier testbed(something that'll only actually fight in an utterly dire emergency, like the world ending) for testing and developing carrier technologies and tactics so that it wouldn't just get sunk first time out(we'd also need to develop carrier aircraft for it)

Well brood, then rewrite it to say you want it better than the capian 100mm, which is definately better that our outdated 160mms(or at least has parity with it)
« Last Edit: May 17, 2013, 05:01:03 am by tryrar »
Logged
This fort really does sit on the event horizon of madness and catastrophe
No. I suppose there are similarities, but I'm fairly certain angry birds doesn't let me charge into a battalion of knights with a car made of circular saws.

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The revolutionary design bureau (OOC)
« Reply #704 on: May 17, 2013, 05:01:16 am »

Well, the helicopters are an unproven design, not to mention the planes are faster and carry more cargo. We should retool specifically for the planes. The helicopters can wait until a post-war scenario is achieved, in preparation for the next one.

And yeah, we'd also need to develop aircraft for the carrier too. But...

You guys support a test uranium reactor being built?
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll
Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 74