Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Gamerlord]

Don't be so Earth life focused. We can be however we want.

[wer6]

We are on the Planet A-32, A strange planet, about half the planet is A mostly Atmospheric less Planet, but the strange part is, the other half Has A atmosphere thats like A Gas giant, Further analysis detects that because of the core, electromagnetic and magnetic requency's make it so that one half of the moon is covered in atmosphere, but the other is not, and both sides of the rocky area are the same, the atmosphere on the bigger side makes it look like  A small gas giant, but the other looks like A rather large planet, both have enough Atmosphere to protect at least some form of life. Truly one of the most strangest planets we have seen

[Gamerlord]

Not one part of that makes any sense, and multiple parts are contradictory.

[wer6]

I tried

[Mesa]

Here's mine!

Planet ZX-535 is a highly volcanically active planet, and its unstable molten core changes on a (Earth) bi-daily basis, causing the planet's gravity to change and parts of the ground to begin to lift in the dense atmosphere, effectively causing the planet to "shatter".

Something like that, I don't know.
Didn't go with any suggestions, it's just my own vision of the senseless thing.

[Eotyrannus]

Well, I can't really think of any way to get floating ground or divided planets, so the one I made earlier seems to be the one we're using. BEGIN THE EDITS OF IT/THE +1S.

If you wish to switch vote, simply say you're switching, and then -1 and +1 to equalise the score.

[Gamerlord]

Which one?

[10ebbor10]

Point is, there's no logical way for it to work, because well, it can't.

Any forces(gravitational, magnetic, rotational) capable of moving that massive amount of atmosphere would easily shatter the planet itself, and destroy it utterly.

Well, I can't really think of any way to get floating ground or divided planets, so the one I made earlier seems to be the one we're using. BEGIN THE EDITS OF IT/THE +1S.

If you wish to switch vote, simply say you're switching, and then -1 and +1 to equalise the score.

I'm fairly sure there's no majority for the no star start. The rogue planet crowd just likes to shout in all caps, and posts constantly.

[Gamerlord]

Hey! I don't post in all-caps (a lot)!

[Eotyrannus]

Point is, there's no logical way for it to work, because well, it can't.

Any forces(gravitational, magnetic, rotational) capable of moving that massive amount of atmosphere would easily shatter the planet itself, and destroy it utterly.

Well, I can't really think of any way to get floating ground or divided planets, so the one I made earlier seems to be the one we're using. BEGIN THE EDITS OF IT/THE +1S.

If you wish to switch vote, simply say you're switching, and then -1 and +1 to equalise the score.

I'm fairly sure there's no majority for the no star start. The rogue planet crowd just likes to shout in all caps, and posts constantly.

Actually, I counted. There's a +2 for no star and a +1 for a red dwarf star.

[10ebbor10]

and a -2 for rogue stars. IIRC. Also, a total +4 to a Blue star primary system, as seen on page 49.

Besides, it's reasonable to assume that everyone who disliked the rogue star idea would vote for an alternative option.

[Gamerlord]

Why does everyone have to be boring and go for a normal star? Rogue planet has so much more potential.

[Eotyrannus]

The -2 was counted up as well. And blue stars, as said previously, would result in us exploding spectacularly after a few generations.

[Mesa]

Why does everyone have to be boring and go for a normal star? Rogue planet has so much more potential.

I support this man. (technically I was the one that came up with the idea of a rogue planet, although after a star-less system was mentioned)

Seriously though, why go for a normal star?
It's BORING.

[Remuthra]

Why does everyone have to be boring and go for a normal star? Rogue planet has so much more potential.

I support this man. (technically I was the one that came up with the idea of a rogue planet, although after a star-less system was mentioned)

Seriously though, why go for a normal star?
It's BORING.

Indeed. I say we go for a very harsh planet, such that life will be forced to adapt in interesting ways.