Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[quinnr]

Yeah, I was thinking about proposing an anti-edit rule, as well. Probably make it legal to edit as long as nobody has posted after that post?

[Sensei]

I'm not sure. If someone starts writing a post calling someone's mistake out/quoting them, and the prior post is edited before the new post is up, we don't know who to trust. Or if we're willing to accept that scenario in favor of the editor, we can go by timestamp in all other occasions.

[quinnr]

I'm not sure. If someone starts writing a post calling someone's mistake out/quoting them, and the prior post is edited before the new post is up, we don't know who to trust. Or if we're willing to accept that scenario in favor of the editor, we can go by timestamp in all other occasions.

There's a timestamp on edits though, isn't there? So won't that show if it was changed before the next person posted?

[Armok]

I'm in

FOR - 306

[Angle]

What is proposal 306? I've checked the entire thread like five times over and I don't see it.

[Sensei]

Amends 202 to allow us to vote on each proposition.

[quinnr]

What is proposal 306? I've checked the entire thread like five times over and I don't see it.

They are kept in the first post.

[Demdemeh]

In.

For - 306.

Proposal 308: Any member who edits a post following the adoption of this amendment, as measured by a comparison of timestamps of the final vote for this proposal (recorded with the approved proposal) with the timestamp of the edit, shall be fined 1 Money.

[a1s]

305. Alteration on 303, if passed - anyone with an avatar that is handmade by that person is considered an Arbiter. (A drawing, a screenshot from a videogame or film they made, a photo of their own creation (the photo itself does not count, only sculptures and such count), or an excerpt from their own writings.)

Since when? I'm pretty sure my proposal (which BTW, isn't mentioned) was 305.

306: for

also,

111. <...> Players may vote for a proposal by mentioning that proposal by number and including a bold-faced "for" in the same line as that proposal number.
...
116. Whatever is not prohibited or regulated by a rule is permitted and unregulated, with the sole exception of changing the rules, which is permitted only when a rule or set of rules explicitly or implicitly permits it.

Since we are not obligated to vote this way, I'd like our voided votes back, please.

[timferius]

I'm in!
306: For

This sounds like a blast, reminds me of a card game I used to play.

[quinnr]

305. Alteration on 303, if passed - anyone with an avatar that is handmade by that person is considered an Arbiter. (A drawing, a screenshot from a videogame or film they made, a photo of their own creation (the photo itself does not count, only sculptures and such count), or an excerpt from their own writings.)

Since when? I'm pretty sure my proposal (which BTW, isn't mentioned) was 305.

306: for

also,

111. <...> Players may vote for a proposal by mentioning that proposal by number and including a bold-faced "for" in the same line as that proposal number.
...
116. Whatever is not prohibited or regulated by a rule is permitted and unregulated, with the sole exception of changing the rules, which is permitted only when a rule or set of rules explicitly or implicitly permits it.

Since we are not obligated to vote this way, I'd like our voided votes back, please.

The may would simply imply that you are not required to vote, would it not? There are no rules stating any other way to vote for things.

Proposal 306 passes. Quorum is now 6.

[Demdemeh]

For - 301

For - 302

Against - 303

Against - 305

For -

New Proposition 309: Players failing to vote in the proper format (that is, a bolded For or Against) are penalized and lose 1 (one) Money.

For - Proposal 308: Any member who edits a post following the adoption of this amendment, as measured by a comparison of timestamps of the final vote for this proposal (recorded with the approved proposal) with the timestamp of the edit, shall be fined 1 Money.

[Scelly9]

For - 301
Against - 302
For - 303
Against - 304
Against - 305
For - 309
For - 308

[timferius]

301. For

302.  Against (way to vague, how much money? etc. etc., recommend retabling it after more thought)

303. Against (need I say why?)

304. Against (redundant)

305. Against (way to complicated)

[quinnr]

305. Alteration on 303, if passed - anyone with an avatar that is handmade by that person is considered an Arbiter. (A drawing, a screenshot from a videogame or film they made, a photo of their own creation (the photo itself does not count, only sculptures and such count), or an excerpt from their own writings.)

Since when? I'm pretty sure my proposal (which BTW, isn't mentioned) was 305.

Adding that to the end of the proposal list now, sorry, the quote box made my eyes glance right over it!

For - 301
Against - 302
For - 303
Against - 304
Against - 305
For - 309
For - 308

All votes up to this vote will be tallied as soon as I add the next few proposals.