Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[paragith]

Hey, glad you are working on the mod again, previous iteration was my favourite addition to vanilla df!
* - previous as is before you started to add dozens of esoteric professions to dwarf mode xD

[smakemupagus]

My second question is that even though their is a section on the metals added via masterworks in the incomplete guide, is their a location that lists the added metals in effectiveness for blunt, slash, pierce, and armor ratings or do I have to look in the raws and compile the necessary charts myself?

I don't think there's any real changes to the materials between v6.2 and v.006. I could've sworn the manual had a chart of the material raws somewhere, but any data compiled from them during v6.2 should still be accurate (meaning the link Emperor provided above).

Patternwelded cobalt, mithril and wolfram don't exist anymore, in both 6.2 and R.006.  (we created that wiki page in version 3 or so).  Otherwise it looks roughly still up to date.  One of you young energetic kids who likes documentation to be accurate should update it

[Dramegno]

Hey guys I am trying to get shell tanning functional in my game so I don't have to wait till the bond update to use shell for armor for my ranged dwarfs, I poked around the raws today and I found some of the entries for the tanning of shells, so too my question which files exactly is the process split up into I found two different .txts but it looks like their would be at least one other file but I admit I look at some of files and my head spins. Any help is appreciated.

[Meph]

It's probably in material_template_default.txt, doesnt have anything to do with the reactions. Except if the GLOB item class clashes with shells, in which case you'd need to separate the reactions into 1 for leather, scale and chitin using GLOB and make a new one for shells using NONE with the shell reaction class.

[qorthos]

Getting these on repeat in the errorlog.txt:

Code: [Select]

*** Error(s) finalizing the reaction WELL_MAGMA_S
Unrecognized Inorganic Token: SMOKE_PURPLE
*** Error(s) finalizing the reaction WELL_MAGMA_M
Unrecognized Inorganic Token: SMOKE_PURPLE
*** Error(s) finalizing the reaction WELL_MAGMA_L
Unrecognized Inorganic Token: SMOKE_PURPLE
*** Error(s) finalizing the creature ELEMENTAL_PAIN
Unrecognized Inorganic Token: SMOKE_PURPLE
*** Error(s) finalizing the reaction LUA_HOOK_SUMMON_NAHASH TAME NUM_5
Unrecognized Inorganic Token: SMOKE_PURPLE
*** Error(s) finalizing the reaction LUA_HOOK_SUMMON_ORTHUS TAME
Unrecognized Inorganic Token: SMOKE_PURPLE
*** Error(s) finalizing the reaction LUA_HOOK_SUMMON_NIGHTMARE TAME
Unrecognized Inorganic Token: SMOKE_PURPLE
*** Error(s) finalizing the reaction LUA_HOOK_SUMMON_PAIN_ELEMENTAL NUM_3
Unrecognized Inorganic Token: SMOKE_PURPLE
*** Error(s) finalizing the reaction LUA_HOOK_SUMMON_IMP_FIRE
Unrecognized Inorganic Token: SMOKE_PURPLE
*** Error(s) finalizing the reaction LUA_HOOK_SUMMON_FROG_DEMON
Unrecognized Inorganic Token: SMOKE_PURPLE
*** Error(s) finalizing the reaction LUA_HOOK_SUMMON_TENTACLE_MONSTER
Unrecognized Inorganic Token: SMOKE_PURPLE
*** Error(s) finalizing the reaction LUA_HOOK_SUMMON_SPIRIT_OF_FIRE
Unrecognized Inorganic Token: SMOKE_PURPLE
*** Error(s) finalizing the reaction LUA_HOOK_SUMMON_HFS
Unrecognized Inorganic Token: SMOKE_PURPLE

This is all succubus related, isn't it?

[Meph]

Yes and harmless. Purple-smoke is missing, which is a decorational thing for magical succubus reactions.

[Dramegno]

Turns out that shells does not like the new reaction that is in reactions_other.txt

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Code: [Select]

[REACTION:TAN_A_HIDE]
[NAME:tan a hide]
[BUILDING:TANNER:CUSTOM_T]
=> These raws are inactive, while the button says YES/ON
YES_MORE_LEATHERMOD!REAGENT:A:1:NONE:NONE:NONE:NONE]
YES_MORE_LEATHERMOD!USE_BODY_COMPONENT]

=> These raws are active, while the buttons says YES/ON
YES_MORE_LEATHERMOD[REAGENT:A:450:GLOB:NONE:NONE:NONE]
YES_MORE_LEATHERMOD[REACTION_CLASS:SKIN]
[UNROTTEN]
[HAS_MATERIAL_REACTION_PRODUCT:TAN_MAT]
[PRODUCT:100:1:SKIN_TANNED:NONE:GET_MATERIAL_FROM_REAGENT:A:TAN_MAT]
[SKILL:TANNER]
[AUTOMATIC]

But I copied over the reaction code from v.000004 and shells started crafting but it broke everything else so I then tried to add this reaction in the reaction_other.txt and/or reaction_dwarf_civ.txt but it doesn't add to the tanner's workshop here is the reaction.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Code: [Select]

[REACTION:TAN_A_SHELL]
[NAME:Tan a shell]
[BUILDING:TANNER:CUSTOM_ALT_T]
[REAGENT:A:1:NONE:NONE:NONE:NONE][USE_BODY_COMPONENT][UNROTTEN]
[HAS_MATERIAL_REACTION_PRODUCT:TAN_MAT]

In the product, if you want to use the reagent's material itself, use NONE instead of a reaction product class (TAN_MAT in this example).

[PRODUCT:100:1:SKIN_TANNED:NONE:GET_MATERIAL_FROM_REAGENT:A:TAN_MAT]
[SKILL:TANNER]
[AUTOMATIC]


If someone more knowledgeable than me can tell me what step I am missing to add a new reaction to the tanner's workshop and actually have it added.

I have tried a fresh worldgen and still nada

[smakemupagus]

You have to permit new reactions in the entity file.

[Dramegno]

smakemupagus thanks alot I now got shell tanning working on my save now. I have tested hardened leather and shell and both works I have not tried scale or chitin.

If you want to use Shell tanning do the following
add

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Code: [Select]

[REACTION:TAN_A_SHELL]
[NAME:Tan a shell]
[BUILDING:TANNER:CUSTOM_ALT_T]
[REAGENT:A:1:NONE:NONE:NONE:NONE][USE_BODY_COMPONENT][UNROTTEN]
[HAS_MATERIAL_REACTION_PRODUCT:TAN_MAT]

In the product, if you want to use the reagent's material itself, use NONE instead of a reaction product class (TAN_MAT in this example).

[PRODUCT:100:1:SKIN_TANNED:NONE:GET_MATERIAL_FROM_REAGENT:A:TAN_MAT]
[SKILL:TANNER]
[AUTOMATIC]

to either your reactions_other.txt or reactions_dwarf_civ.txt or equivalent for your civ.

then add

Code: [Select]

[PERMITTED_REACTION:TAN_A_SHELL] to your entity_good_dwarf.txt or equivalent.

then regen and play.

I know that Meph can make this neater than I did since this is the second time for me changing raws my first time was making the underground crops grow year around like they would in real life. If their are any incompatibilities say something and I will try to fix it.

[Curious Key]

I'm just wondering, is masterwork (dwarf race) fleshed out much yet for .40.xx? Is the current version worth trying to play a long-term fort on? I'd love to give it a try, but I'm in a megaproject encrusted mood, and I wouldn't wanna start a world now if it would be unstable and I'd have to ditch it later.

[Meph]

It is fleshed out, but not as large as before. But you got lots of new workshops. Just start it up and then you can decide if you think the features are enough. It's certainly larger than vanilla DF.

[Curious Key]

It is fleshed out, but not as large as before. But you got lots of new workshops. Just start it up and then you can decide if you think the features are enough. It's certainly larger than vanilla DF.

Well I don't mind if it's smaller than previous versions, mostly I just want to know if the stuff that's in is functional in it's current state so I don't have to worry about crashes/weirdness that could make a long-term world unfeasible.  Just because your version numbering scheme seems to suggest the mod is in a very early state for this version. Sorry I didn't do a very good job of wording that question

[Meph]

There is one large bug, but it only happens if you change tilesets. You have a duplicate of PEAT_SOIL. Otherwise the mod runs fine.

[Curious Key]

There is one large bug, but it only happens if you change tilesets. You have a duplicate of PEAT_SOIL. Otherwise the mod runs fine.

Ok thanks.

[Dramegno]

quick question I have noticed that the hammerhead bolts that my dwarfs fire do not land forbidden like regular bolts do. Is this intended operation or am I experiencing a bug that by my knowledge will lead to fun in the future or even worse is it due to the limitations of the game that would prevent them from behaving the same?