Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Ukrainian Ranger]

No, attack is planned on the turn just done, it's just have no battle part in it.

K-1s will come next turn to advance in Morovia\finish Capia or repair the front after the failure. Whatever will happen it will be a fun surprise for our enemy

[mesor]

It's set in the present tense not past so I'll wait for the boss to clarify, but Brood can you edit yours to use only current tech and not include things yet to be built?

[Brood]

Done, is my plan acceptable Ukranian? It's still your main plan I just added a couple of extra details to it to improve our odds, mainly special forces and aerial recon, special forces to provide early warning of Movanian reinforcements and sending forces to spread out across the country to deal with all resistance, not just focus on the capitol and hope the rest surrender.

I like your plan mostly it just needed a little bit of tweaking.

[RAM]

There have been about 60 posts since the update and it isn't even finished yet, perhaps we could mull things over for a few hours and give folk in the rest of the world a chance to make proposals.

[Brood]

Yeah.

I'll put the two current plans here to make it easier for others to see.

Spoiler: 7, Ukranian. (click to show/hide)

Warplan

Do "Pearl Harbour" to the unnamed country (I propose Capia for it's name) Use a combination of surprise attack from the air using our respectable fleet of biplanes, and from sea by Righteous boats to strike ships of the unnamed country in the port. Also use some  Righteous boats to land special forces at the naval base to further the damage. and destroy coastal batteries if some exist, then send third wave consisting of our large ships to completely devastate enemy naval base Than use our tanks, atrmored cars and 40mm trailers (and air support)  to rapidy advanche to the capital of the capitalist pigs to arrest government evil oppressors

Post surprise attack, depending on results our navy and airforce should:
a) If the attack is successful, whole Navy patrol Capia's territorial waters in attempt to disrupt shipping and possible Moravian aid, 25% of airforce aids navy, 75% aids army advance
b) if attacks fails to destroy majority of Capia's navy, Navy goes on defensive under protection of coastal guns, 75% of airforce aids navy, 25% aids armed forces [/color]

Spoiler: 7.1, Brood. (click to show/hide)

7.1
Do "Pearl Harbour" to the unnamed country (I propose Capia for it's name) Use a combination of surprise attack from the air using our respectable fleet of biplanes, and from sea by Righteous boats to strike ships of the unnamed country in the port. Also use some  Righteous boats to land special forces at the naval base and along the coast to further the damage. and destroy coastal batteries if some exist and advance inland to scout enemy positions, then send third wave consisting of our large ships to completely devastate enemy naval base with a second wave of bombings.
Also send a few biplanes inland to scout enemy positions ahead of the attack.
Than use our upgraded badgers in the lead and armored car forces behind bringing in infantry along with air support to rapidy advance to the capital of the capitalist pigs to arrest government evil oppressors while non upgraded badgers, armored cars and cannons are used to destroy any other pockets of resistance.
Special forces units also advance to the Morovian border to provide early warning of enemy reinforcements from hidden positions.

Post surprise attack, depending on results our navy and airforce should:
a) If the attack is successful, whole Navy patrol Capia's territorial waters in attempt to disrupt shipping and possible Moravian aid, 25% of airforce aids navy, 75% aids army advance
b) if attacks fails to destroy majority of Capia's navy, Navy goes on defensive under protection of coastal guns, 75% of airforce aids navy, 25% aids armed forces

[Ukrainian Ranger]

I vote for Brood's edition (7.1) as it is more detailed than mine

Funny thing that GM may disallow us to plan that far, because we are designers that give advices to generals and they may say "fuck off" and do whatever they want. But we need something to do before the update, as planning designs without knowing what will happen is impossible for me

[10ebbor10]

So now is just warplanning?

Or do we get to design stuff too?

[Brood]

Both, but we don't know what happened this year so designs is a little iffy, you might design a new ship then find the enemy just had a massive breakthrough on aircraft.

[Nadaka]

note, that limitation was for 2 design proposals. production and petitions do not take nearly as much effort to process.

[Brood]

Nadaka is the war plan to go on the end of this turn? Or is it for next turn after the years production and development?
Also, does the completion of the K-1 give us a prototype of it?

[10ebbor10]

OK, going to dig up whatever designs have been proposed.

[10ebbor10]

So well, in order to design stuff.

Have some people working on creating lightweight, fairly long range gliders. Supply hooks and ropes, so that they can be towed/ dropped from airships

Attempt to directional explosives/warheads for use against armored structures, vehicles, and the like

Basically, 2 antifortification suggestions which might be usefull in the future. At least, let's hope so.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Code: [Select]

kah,try-1) Develop [for the K-1] high velocity 80mm cannon, plus compatible High Explosive and Armour piercing shells.
kah,try-2) Replace [on the K-1] 2x 170kw engines with 2x400kw engines. The infrastructure for two engines is already there. Shouldn't be too much of a problem installing them, especially if they are compact.
try,kah,RAM, PI-3,10ebbor10)Begin refitting the new diesel into anything that'll fit it(excluding aircraft of course). This includes, but is not limited to; the PT boats, cars, trucks, the Armored Car, and the Badger. I'm aiming to streamline supply lines by having everything ground-based run on diesel.
try,kah-4)Continue work on the new Worker destroyer class, this time as a full scale effort, with the following modification: if the high-velocity 80mm [from proposal 1] is completed design and mount two double 80mm turrets instead of the double and single 160mm. As an addendum, any ship currently armed with the low-velocity 80mm is to have the high-velocity 80mm refitted to it
RAM,10ebbor10-5): Finish the airship-bomber-subhunter thing that we got a good start on.
RAM-6): Design a simple, low-cost automatic rifle to replace the Mosin Nagant. Have it fire sixteen of the standard 8mm rounds between reloads.
10ebbor10-7): Ligth weight gliders
10ebbor10-8): Directional explosives


[/quote]

[tryrar]

Alrighty then in light of that,

Spoiler: Prouction proposals (click to show/hide)

I propose we cease production of mosin nagants and retool that factory for the better SVA-10, and retool the smaller small-arms factory for the remaining small-arms designs we have. Also exand that factory while we're at it.
 Get the drydock up to being able to handle Glorious cruisers so they can be refit easily
Start producing the new monoplane fighters
-Name them the YR-1 Zephyr
Double the size of the Alexi shipyard so as to produce at least 2 a year
Get a small factory going to produce small numbers of K-1s
Get 2 more factories going to produce HVG-40s for refit and production purposes

I also need you guys's opinion on something. Next turn I want to replace the Glorious cruisers' steam turbines with diesel-electric turbines(hopefully shaving quite a bit of weight in the process), but I'm not sure if this is feasible or if I should just go ahead and design a powerplant for a new cruiser class to eventually use


Umm, 10ebbor I know flamethrowers were cool, but in reality they were fairly situational weapons at best, and bullet magnets at worst(they were large, bulky, depending on construction and fuel type pretty explosive, and marked the guy wielding it as an instant target as it was assumed he was a big dick for using a flamethrower by the enemy forces ). Let's not make the same mistake; if you're really set on a thermal weapon why not something like an incendiary grenade?

[10ebbor10]

Remember, there's a 2 proposals per person limit. I therefore propose to place the nondesign proposals on a seperate list.

And as I said, the flamethrower is intended as a situational weapon. It's intended for use in conjuction with the glider. Land "unnoticed" on the enemy fortifications, flush them out of their kazemats, take some explosives, and you can capture a fort with a 4000 men garrison in 1 hour, with no losses. Using only a hundred men.

I think I'll go design those explosives instead.

[Funk]

yes lets build sone kind of napam grenade and a large tank mounted flame thrower for taking on bunkers.

a flame tank can have huge flame throw with better range and coverage, more ammo and is much safer due to being inside a tank.